News

Is the Skoda Kylaq AT a right upgrade for me from a VW Polo diesel?

All in all, I think we are going to keep our booking of the Signature+ AT Kylaq. The dealership says we can expect delivery towards the end of March.

BHPian dalmeow recently shared this with other enthusiasts:

I got to take a test drive of the Kylaq AT yesterday from Trinity Skoda in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The drive was 80% (mostly) crowded highways and 20% service roads. For context, my family is thinking of upgrading our ageing Polo 1.2 Diesel of 13 years with a car that feels familiar while being better. Here are my observations:

Ride and handling:

  • Ride Quality: It might feel like I am just repeating what the others have said, but the car drives just as maturely as you would expect out of a Skoda-VW. It feels really great being behind the wheel, you are always in control and the car can go fast if you decide to push it. The power delivery is very smooth, and I couldn't feel any kind of jerks when the shifts happened or even a very sudden surge in power when flooring the gas pedal which leads to a downshift. It is all very predictable and super nice.
  • Creep: I have driven my friend's Slavia 1.0 AT around quite a bit, and his was one of the first few Slavias sold in the city. That one has a very obvious problem with creep, which causes the car to suddenly lunge as soon as you leave the brakes when on a standstill. The Kylaq meanwhile, doesn't seem to have this issue at all, which is great!
  • Steering: I found the steering to be very light and easy at slower speeds, and it gains weight as you go faster. It is precise throughout and is quite easily maneuverable, giving you a lot of confidence. Some people pointed that they would have liked more heft at higher speeds, but I didn't particularly dislike the amount of heft it gained while driving at speeds of 80-100. For context, I have driven the 2 generations older Creta extensively, and I absolutely hate how light and lacking its steering feels. In comparison to the Kylaq, our Polo's steering is very heavy, the Sonet's is soulless but does the job and the 3XO's is not as confidence inspiring.
  • Suspension: The suspension tuning is brilliant. The broken sections on the highway (of which there were plenty) were quite effortlessly managed by the Kylaq and the ride was very comfortable. At speeds of even around 100 km/hr, the car felt extremely well planted. No body roll on long-ish curves at these speeds either. On service roads which were basically not even tarmac, you can feel the bumps. The car absorbs quite a bit, but when you are on the rear seat, you can feel the undulations. I drove the Prestige with 17" wheels, and expect this to be a little lesser with the 16".
  • AT Gearbox: There is a very noticeable 1-1.5 second lag that the automatic gearbox has. Even when in sports mode, if you suddenly try to push the car and press the gas pedal hard, it takes a solid second to realize and downshift and then gives you the power. Manual shifting does make this slightly better, but there is still a lag. Once it does give you the power though, it absolutely gets going. It is something that can be lived with for sure, and is not noticeable at all in regular driving. This lag when pushing is probably more noticeable also because the turbo doesn't kick in until ~2000 RPM, but the gearbox itself is not a fast one by any stretch of imagination.
  • Overall: If I were to ignore the gearbox lag, the car is really great to drive, and I absolutely loved it! I have test driven the 3XO, Sonet, Brezza, Nexon and the Kushaq previously and only the Kushaq comes close which is no surprise. Coming from our Polo, the Kylaq does not quite push you back in your seat as much, but it comes the closest. I guess it has to do with the fact that the Polo has the same amount of torque owing to it's diesel engine. The ride comes together very well overall, is very mature, and thus really enjoyable, which I can't appreciate enough given the competition. It is easy, reasonably fast and very confident.
  • Front row: Really good interiors if you are sitting in the driver's seat. The steering and the digital driver's console feel very premium. The center display is super high quality, bright, and has a very fluid UI. AC controls are not bad. I personally loved the seats (I'm relatively thinner and shorter than average), and like people have mentioned previously, you really do sit in them and not on them! My friend who accompanied me is of a larger build and he didn't quite fit in well in the seats so didn't like it as much so YMMV. Very natural and lovely riding position, it is not trying to give you a superficial feeling of being 'high and commanding'. Armrests are positioned well. Overall, very comfortable and natural, feels familiar and like home coming from the Polo, while also being a decent upgrade. Only complaints are with the plastics, more on which later.
  • Rear row: Not as 'premium feeling' as the front is the only way I can describe it. There is not a lot wrong with it, the seats have a good position and are comfortable unless you are sitting in the middle, and there is enough knee and head room. It is good overall, but the 3XO for example feel luxurious in comparison, and the Sonet feels great. The feeling you get in the Kylaq is that of mediocrity. Not the most airy cabin, and the black interiors don't help. You notice the hard plastics. If you are slightly of a bigger build, one of your arms would be resting out of the seat and on the plastic part between the door and the seat which doesn't feel good. It is however very comfortable and spacious. Overall, it is not unacceptable but the competition leaves much to be desired, and I haven't even checked out the Syros yet.
  • Plastics and other materials: I dislike them. They may be sturdy sure, but also feel really cheap. Especially the recycled dark green plastic on the doors - they are terrible. The test drive vehicle already had multiple scratches and it has only been a week. It will surely not age well, and brands should really rethink this stupid marketing ploy of 'sustainability' by using 4-5 pieces of recycled plastic around the car. The AC vents are also cheap plastic and do not feel good either, I doubt if these will age well either. Our 13 year old Polo has better quality vents. The roof liner is cheap too, and there is a lot of flex in it. Another thing that our Polo did better. The other plastics though are good, like those on the dash, door (apart from the green one) and center console.
  • Others: Rear camera quality is terrible like the others have already pointed out. AC seemed fine, nothing too great or too bad. The temperatures outside were ~36 already so there's that. Sound system quality is quite good. Door close thud is good, though not as good as the Polo's was in its prime, and ever so slightly worse than the Kushaq.

All in all, I think we are going to keep our booking of the Signature+ AT Kylaq. The dealership says we can expect delivery towards the end of March. What stood out the most was the ride and how the car feels overall. Seems like a good upgrade from the Polo. I hate the fact that even the second from top model doesn't get projector headlamps and rear wipers. I also hate how the green recycled plastic bits inside the car scuff up. But I guess we will have to live with it because it more than makes up for it in the way it drives and how practical and comfortable it is overall, at the price point.

TLDR; Love the way it drives, very mature, confidence inspiring and fun. Slight lag when pushing and questionable material choices wrt some plastics take away from the experience. Overall though, I'm ready to live with the slight compromises, as it is a car that I really like all things considered.

Check out BHPian comments for more insights and information.

 
Seat belts save lives