News
BHPian pqr recently shared this with other enthusiasts.
The mid-size SUV segment in India now has three low-running-cost vehicle options available, based on different technologies: conventional diesel engine (ICE) from Hyundai-KIA; strong hybrid (HEV) from Toyota-Maruti; and pure electric (BEV) from MG. There are numerous use cases, and each product and technology comes with its own set of advantages and limitations. So which one to choose?
Toyota has been claiming that HEV technology is the right transitionary path to BEV adoption, and to walk the talk, Toyota brought strong hybrid technology to the masses in India in the form of the Toyota Hyryder, based on its non-identical twin, the Maruti Grand Vitara. MG has also launched the ZS EV facelift this year with an updated battery pack. The Hyundai Creta is due for a facelift early next year.
The European MG ZS EV received a five-star rating in the 2019 Euro NCAP crash test. ZS EV are imported as CKD units and are assembled at MG India’s plant in Halol, Gujarat. The Hyundai Creta only received a three-star rating in the GNACP frontal offset crash test (old protocol). The Toyota Hyryder is yet to be tested.
Exterior dimensions can be deceptive, because actual usable in-cabin and boot space depends on overall packaging done by designers and engineers, and potential buyers need to examine cars in person and make a final decision based on family needs.
The MG ZS EV has a very powerful drivetrain and offers exhilarating performance, typical of most BEVs. Perceived value for exhilarating performance needs to be mentally factored in at the time of relative price to value analysis. Hyryder’s hybrid system is only tuned for efficiency, and the fun factor took an extreme back seat. The power to weight ratio gap is 17 PS per ton. Though the power output of the Hyundai Creta is the same as the Toyota Hyryder, the high torque output of the diesel engine makes the real difference, along with the smooth torque convertor transmission. For drivability, potential buyers need to take a test drive themselves or may refer to several available reviews.
Feature-wise, all products are well matched, covering all the basics with some differentiators.
Total ownership cost = purchase cost + running cost + maintenance cost differential.
Now this study will focus on the theoretical customer benefit part, i.e., the total ownership cost that includes purchase cost, running cost, and maintenance cost differential. Since use cases vary a lot, this study will be more of a theoretical exercise, and the outcome is more indicative than a definitive conclusion.
Higher fuel efficiency leads to lower average running costs, which offset the higher initial cost of purchase of vehicles, thus delivering a higher monetary benefit over the long term, provided the vehicle covers higher mileage every year.
Efficiency:
Battery life and resale value:
On-road price:
Break even simulation: Based on changing fuel price:
Fuel prices vary a lot over a time period as they are subjected to a lot of factors. From 2017 onwards, petrol and diesel price differences came down, thus reducing the running cost benefit diesel engines have.
Below is the break-even simulation based on different fuel prices:
Break even analysis:
In the pre-pandemic era, average fuel prices remained below ₹ 80. However, in the last three years, fuel prices have gone through the roof, and the cost of running has become an even more crucial factor in purchase decisions.
The below table summarizes the indicative breakeven point based on different petrol price points. A purchase decision has to be based on an individual's use case and charging convenience:
BEVs in India are taxed at a 5% GST rate, whereas strong hybrids longer than 4m in length have a 43% GST incidence. The 15-year road tax is also exempt in many states for BEVs. These two government concessions make BEV a viable option for reducing pollution in the immediate vicinity. But are BEVs really a financially viable alternative to HEVs and pure ICE in the long term without government support? Let’s try to examine that aspect too.
Without applicable tax, the BEV is ₹ 11,36,790 more expensive than the HEV. What should be kept in the back of the mind is that the MG ZS EV comes through the CKD import route and is more powerful.
The simulation below is based on the non-concessional price of HEV and BEV:
Without government concession programs, BEV does not seem to be a financially viable alternative, even when fossil fuel prices are high. To what extent local production of cars and cells built under the ACC PLI scheme with imported raw materials in India, along with economies of scale in battery production, bridge such a wide gap in cost in coming years? Only time will tell.
Green credential:
If grid electricity's CO2 footprint is factored in, the BEV loses its green credential. But then that’s not BEV’s fault; this is due to the heavy reliance on fossil fuels as a major power generation source in India. Pure solar-based charging points are far and few, and mostly not viable in heavily urbanized regions of India.
For the time being, BEVs are only assisting in shifting pollutants to the location of thermal power generation due to zero tailpipe emissions. What India needs is an urgent and rapid diversification of renewable power generation sources.
Check out BHPian comments for more insights and information.