[comprakash]

The 3XO is also good in ride and handling. The EPS steering seems to be light for both 3XO and Kylaq. 3XO has better petrol and diesel engines. It has ADAS Level 2 which is well tuned for Indian road conditions.

Now the Kylaq does not seem to have the provision for ADAS Camera, Radar Sensor or even the 360 cameras. Looks wise, it has tiny rear tail lamps, and overall body stance wise, it looks smaller, like a micro SUV.

Apart from the ventilated seats and electronic/brake locking differential, it may not have much to offer over 3XO. Its top end may be cheaper than 3XO top end, but only with lesser power and features.

So it does not make much sense to wait for the Kylaq, apart from the varying or unknown waiting period for the 3XO.

[gtr_amg22]

IMHO, please wait for Skoda Kylaq. It is based on a very sturdy and safe platform (MQB AO IN) and is 5 star rated using the latest protocols. It also is going to have a punchy engine which powers the lower trims of the Kushaq and Taigun

My earnest request, please don't get into a buy now, regret later situation. If you can wait for a few months, you will get a very good product. Believe me, no one can beat the Germans!

[comprakash]

Skoda Kylaq is launched. https://www.skoda-auto.co.in/models/teaser/kylaq

However as predicted, it misses ADAS, 360-degree camera and panoramic sunroof.

The small rear lights and touch AC Controls (copied from Kushaq) are a letdown.

At least alloys look good.

[xway]

Kylaq is launched to confuse you further.

In any case its your decision on what you want, if you want driving dynamics, engine, performance, suspension than kylaq it is, and if you prioritise space, price, interiors than 3xo. Both are different purpose and segments with no overlap. We cant compare Skoda/VW to a Mahindra no way.