Quote:
Originally Posted by vijuvarghese My experience with tyres on the 2.2 VTT.
Despite having driven 2K kms, got a chance to replace(exchange) stock Bridgestone H/T Dueler with Michelin LTX A/T 2. And therefore got to compare two sets of tyres within 10K kms.
Even in the initial 2K period at 2400-2500rpm in 5th, I could cruise at 110-120kmph with the H/T tyres, without revving hard. Now with Michelin A/T, have to labour hard to reach 120kmph that too managed only at 2800 rpm in 5th. Due the increased traction, feel I am losing 1km to a litre of diesel.
But I feel the braking distance has come down with Michelins and also I feel the ride quality improved a bit, both subjective of course. Haven't had many a chance to brake hard in the first 2K, but just the opposite after 5K :-(
The A/T came handy while crossing a mud track which I guess may not have been same with H/T.
Viju |
This is weird. The problem may le elsewhere. Unless you are using 255 section, there should not be much difference in top speed Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysmokesleaves Thanks for the inputs guys.
Im not intent on upsizing at all.
@tsk > I dont think they sell Continentals in Bombay. I couldnt find a dealer anywhere.
I like the BFG's on Adc's but the tire noise is a no no for me.
For my usage i know that I need a tire with good sidewall strength.
The OE Bridgestones are pretty good on road and moderately good offroad. But not good in slush and sand and other triicky surfaces.
@tsk > How would you comparitively rate the stopping distance for Conti's and Bridge's ?
What is the cost of the Yoko's ? and which Yoko tire to buy ?
Though mileage is not a concern for me(currently 10.5 - 11kpl with full ac), stopping distance is crucial.
I hope the Yokos are stikier than the Brdgestones when it comes to braking.
Jk whats your take on the braking with your Yokos compared to Bridgestones? |
The Continentals have slightly poorer braking on wet tarmac. Nothing very drastic, but slightly less as the tire compound is harder. Any AT tire with harder compound will have slightly less braking efficiency. People do not notice it because they replace their tires when old ones are worn out. So old Bridgestone HTs will skid more than brand new AT. But new AT vs HT tire, the HT will perform better on road because its designed for road.
For your usage, if you are more or less okay with a HT tire, try the BFG Long Trail TA Tour. Its a trail driving tire. Not completely an AT tire like Yokohama or continental, but better than HTs. Something like the soft roader of AT tires if you get my drift.
Low noise, good mileage, good traction, and average Off road performance. Quote:
Originally Posted by suman With the kind of territory you enjoy driving in, avoid an upsize. You will have to cut part of the fender/mudguards IIRC. Also, for an upsize, you should ideally have 7J alloys as against the stock 6.5J.
Go with the Yokos or Michelin A/Ts - my Yokos have done close to 30k kms & I haven't seen any increase in road noise so far. They are far more planted than the 'Stones on tarmac (dry & wet) & performed pretty good in the dirt, stone & no-road bits of Ladakh. Stopping power is better than the 'Stones IMHO.
I got A/TS?? | Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikhilb2008 Jay, you will efinitely get COnti in Bombay if you want.
If you go for yoko, you would be buying the Yoko Geolandar G012 A/T.
YOkos are waaaay better than the Bridgestones when it comes to handling and braking. |
I think There were two versions
1. AT/2
2. AT/S
The Desert Storm guys had tough time with AT/2 which kept on getting punctured due to their weak sidewalls. Apparently this problem is fixed with AT/S tires which are the later generation and tougher.
As for stopping power, I think its better because your Bridgestones were end of life when you got ATS tires. Brand new HT tire will always perform better than AT tire. Even the company brochures say so. HT is designed for road travel, and AT is supposed to be jack of all trades. |