Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami 1) I know people who had their indica failed in middle of nowhere because of reliability issues.
I know a family who lost lives of near and dear people because the steering of Indigo failed. Indigo was not even one year old. |
So, does it make all TATA vehicles are bad? Certainly no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami 2) Its true, but the car has to be safe and some minimum quality bits are expected.
Its like buying 600 dpi mouse and 800 dpi mouse. The latter will cost more, but will function better. The former will not be able to do its job properly for long. |
Expected, yes. But expectation differs between audience. Did Nano fullfill expectation? Yes, for those who have right expectation. And he knows well that he is not paying for a civic or high end car and also knows well what to expect for what he pays.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami Correct, they worked backwards, that is the error. I doubt the integrity of the shell in case of crash, handling, etc. The real answer lies below. |
There is a post that says, the total cost of each spares is way higher than the car itself and so some dealers buy cars rather than buying spares. So,
can we really calculate like this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami This brings me to real point. A person who barely manages to fuel his expenditure of bike will buy Nano for using it as a city car ? The maintenance will be surely more than bike, FE will go down from 60 to 20-22. Do you think he will still use Nano for city driving ? |
He will. Why? We are not talking about ONE person driving it. Its been for the family and not for sales rep who keeps driving his bike all over the city.
Not only that, even people like these sales rep will take Nano for single driver use. Why? Because, its gives more mileage than other cars, more comfort from his bike in the hot sun or rain, etc etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami What he will end up doing is this : using Nano as highway car.
Those who have one or more car and are using their present cars for city transport will buy this car for using in city. The target audience will end up in trouble big time on highways. |
We are in trouble even now with those numerous other vehicles which create issues. So, does it stop people from buying car at all? No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami About me being in target audience. I am still in college. I will in the target zone, but will not buy this car becasue I will have family only when I am able to pull up a nice big house and two midsize cars. This is the best thing to do rather than buying Nano as a compulsion which is consequence of a big mistake of having wife + 2 kids. |
That answers to all questions, I mean you cant think from "family" angle. Lol, Now you know if I am married. Hahaa.
btw, if you have the wish and money to own a GOOD cars, then there is no point in even thinking this Nano.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami Nano is purely a city car, nothing more. I feel that those who barely manage to get Rs. 60K bike will not use nano as a city vehicle. This defeats the purpose of the car. |
Again, no. He will stop using autos for those family outing and use this as city car for sure. Especaily on those rainy days when auto fares touch the sky.
Btw, how many percentage of the driving / family owning cars drive through the highways? may be its hardly 10% of whole population holding the cars. There are so many people who prefers not to do highway driving and rather prefer bus / trains for long distance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaggoswami Now what could be better :
1) Tyres : The bigger wheel will have less vertical movement = better ride quality. For a car this tall, why cant we have 13" tyres atleast ? 12" is too much cost cutting.
2) A simple and ultitarian car's engine must be easily accessible. Is this the case with Nano ?
Rs. 2 use and throw pen will be used more roughly than Rs. 100 Parker.
Nano will be used more roughly and wear and tear is also going to be more owing to low running costs ( people will use car more ). And the engine access is restricted. Those who have opened engine at home will understand how the comfortable access to mill can be helpful.
3) Two cylinder engine. Make it three and I will agree this is a car.
4) Dynamics. The car is tall on small wheels. The target audience will have to be aware this thing is totally different from two wheeler. |
Its just simple to sit and comment. Dont you think the people behind the screen would have got a valid reason for all these/ Ofcourse, I believe cost is NOT the only reason.
btw, the world has agreed this is a car. So, I dont think TATA or even anyone expects or waiting for you to agree
![Smile](https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.png)