Quote:
Originally Posted by sups Liva has quite cheap interior. How did you have a premium feel in it? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadhuG Not sure on what counts you feel that Liva is a premium hatchback. IMHO, the Figo feels much more premium that Liva. |
It's quite hard for me to decide which feels more premium - Figo vs Liva. Yes, Liva's plastics are horrible but in Liva-
1. Lighter interior shade
2. More space
3. The mindset "I'm in a Toyota. It's a premium brand in India"
4. Ease of driving thanks to large RPM range of each gears
5. Comfortable gliding over potholes at low speed
These factors makes Liva feel more premium than Figo. But on the other hand, in Figo-
1. Better interior plastics
2. Real rear seats (and not just park bench)
3. The mindset "I'm driving a Ford who makes true cars and not just box on wheels"
4. Ease of driving in city thanks to good low-end torque in petrol and minimum turbo-lag in diesel
5. Supreme confidence and comfort while smashing through potholes at high speed
These factors make Figo feel more premium than Liva. Looks like they are closely/evenly matched. I take back my words "What I miss - the feeling of a premium hatchback. It doesn't feel as premium as Liva or Vista." They more or less equal in "feeling" factor. I definitely remember hating Figo after doing TD of Etios petrol and then hating doing TD of Liva petrol after owning Figo for 4 months.
Hey sups,
I read your post on Liva's thread. After having discussion with fellow Figo owners here, I came to assume that Figo was silently updated in Sept'11 which made improvements in suspension and ECU settings along with other changes like headlamp cluster. This could be the reason you found new Figo to be much better than older one. Not sure if Figo ages faster. No one here to testify for the same. Older Fords (Ikon and Fusion) are known not to rattle or age easily but so also are Toyotas. Figo, being based on Fiesta platform (which has Ikon, Fusion and Fiesta Classic) can be assumed to withstand ageing pretty good. Not sure about Etios/Liva. Yes, they look flimsy but looks can be deceiving.
I see that you also did TD of Etios. While hunting for a new car, I had done TD of Etios and liked it better than Figo. But a lot of things put me off as well, like tractor-like sound from engine and pathetic AC (may be Figo's AC raised my standard during TD).
Overall feeling was - Etios > Figo > Liva.
I've read that insulation in Etios and Liva have been improved since then. This might make Liva better than Figo. New Dzire is expected to be better in terms of backseat ride but alas, there's no chance that you can get it before the price hike so it's out. You're in quite tight spot. All the best in picking one by next day
Quote:
Originally Posted by sansvk wrt point no 3., Petrol Figo with the worst kind of driving style (like mine) would deliver 11kmpl, on the same front even if I drive sedatly I dont get more than 12kmpl with AC in Bangalore city.
I totally agree with point no. 4, Figo gives you the confidence to drive at high speeds on broken roads. |
I was talking about diesel ones. But in case of petrol, I'm not sure either. If we take cardekho.com to be reference, the figures are as following for petrol versions-
Figo - 12.5 - 15.5 kmpl
Vista - 12.1 - 15.8 kmpl
Yes, I know that in case of Figo, the actual figure is more like 11-15kpl (since I own one) but same could be true about Vista too. Then I assume, their mileage to be equal in their petrol avatars. It's logical too. Vista is as heavy as Figo (1035kg vs Figo's 1040kg) and has even punier engine (65PS@5500RPM and 96Nm@3000RPM vs Figo's 71PS@6250RPM and 102Nm@4000RPM).