Re: Sold off my Tata Safari Kaziranga XZA+ in just 9 months Quote:
Originally Posted by 07CR Call it premonition or what, but I had seen your last post on Azure (You had also mentioned about the next ride being the Safari), and somehow I felt that this is not a good move. You will miss Azure, and regret buying the Safari. Personally, I am not a fan of Tata Vehicles above Altroz, but I never wish anyone ill for buying their cars above Altroz.  But somehow I had that feeling.
PS- I too own a Ecosport S TDCI (17 inch rim), and maybe that was some weird connection between our two Ford's, which led me to the premonition!  |
I also follow your posts where you update about your Ecosport. I never thought that any car costing so much will have ergonomic flaws. I can expect them in lower priced ones but not the ones costing as much. However, this may also differ from person to person and others may not find it discomforting enough to warrant a replacement.
On a lighter note, wish you had shared the premonition with me beforehand, would have saved me quite a few bucks. Quote:
Originally Posted by sandeepmdas I own the XU700 since March 2023, having replaced my 10-year-old 500 with it. I'll tell you the three factors that bother me.
.
.
Now that said, the service interval of Tata cars was an irritatingly frequent 5000kms / 6 months previously. I assume it is the same for the Safari. The 700 comes with a 10K/1 year service interval that you can live with (except the first service which is within the first month or 1000 kms). However, the major service of the Harrier AFAIK is 15K / 1 year means you need consumables in every 15K only. This advantage is applicable only if you're clocking more than 10K per year. |
Thanks a lot for sharing your ownership insights on the XUV700. However, for the issues you mentioned, Safari has an equally, if not worse, bad A-pillar blind spot and the wing mirrors cover a very less area with the range of adjustment also restricted so these two will somehow manage. My tipping out earlier and deciding to go with Safari was this auto dimming IRVM. With a vehicle so much technology and 5 star safety, this simple safety device is left out.
Moreover, the service intervals for Safari are minor service at every 7500 kms and major service is at every 15000 kms. Also, the costs are way more than what XUV700 costs for the same number of kilometers travelled. I have attached below screenshots for the stats on FE and overall costs. I had visited the workshops for services, DEF top ups and one damage to the AC pipe for a total of 9 times in 9 months and 24k kms. Quote:
Originally Posted by fhdowntheline What is it with front seat sizes in the new and larger cars ? I test drove the Hector CVT recently and felt the front seat was not larger than my Creta's seat. In fact due to the overdone ICE module in the canter, I felt the driver and especially passenger seat to be a bit cramped. Even the Safari did not feel very comfortable during one official road trip. I distinctly remember the seats in my erstwhile Linea/City, they were so much more comfortable. |
I am of the same opinion. My 2009 Fiat Grande Punto had better seats than any other car I have owned after that. I feel the 2000s decade put more emphasis on comfort and take any car from that era and one will find atleast front row seats to be more comfortable and spacious than today's cars. Quote:
Originally Posted by impala I am driving one for around 19 months now and I am very happy with it barring some earlier niggles. Given you had a concern about under-thigh support, do a longish test drive. This is one concern I have with XUV700 too, and I am 5'11". Unless I keep the seat weirdly high, the car lacks under thigh support and I often feel calf pain too. Something I didn't experience in other cars including small hatchbacks. I know someone else who had similar concerns too. |
Thanks a lot for the insights. However, with my height of 5'9" and build, I found the driving position to be way better than Safari's. I even took a 200 kms round trip on the test car and felt it was better. However, true picture will only be realized once I own it and drive for my typical long journey. For the calf pain, I think the throttle is more responsive than the Safari and also with adaptive cruise control, this can be taken care of. However, I can only predict and it remains to be seen whether I face same issues in XUV700 as well. Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Roy As a fellow Safari owner and one who has the same needs as you, I can empathise with your suffering. To make matters worse, I came from a 2016 Chevy Cruze to the Safari and believe me, American and European cars are designed in such a way that you'll be immediately at home in the cockpit aka the driver's seat. Just like you, I have a pretty high mileage and the only thing that made me choose the safari was safety. Comfort was there, but safety was the priority. So far, I have clocked 65000 kms in 2 years and all the complaints that you say are true.But, barring the left pull for which there seems to be no solution, the rest have a work around. |
Oh man! Thanks a lot for your post. You have done what actually needed to be done by Tata motors at their factory. Hats off to your effort and thanks for sharing your solution for the issues faced. However, I doubt most people would ever undertake such efforts. These basic ergonomic flaws need to be highlighted to OEMs so that they can make the necessary changes. |