Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailee_Jatt_Boy Are you considering the RDX also? or is it too small for your requirement? I feel that the MDX is under powered. Too heavy for the engine. I have not driven the 2010 though. My vote would be to go for ML out of the two.
The other option that you might want to consider is Lexus RX 350 or 450. But again this might also be small for your need.
If provide some more inputs on how much space you are looking for I think you will get better inputs.  |
Hmmm yeah the RDX is a little too small for my taste. Was looking for a smallish SUV instead of a crossover-type vehicle. I currently have a GL which is 7 seats and huge, whereas the MDX is also 7 seater but after opening up the 3rd row seating the trunk space is nonexistent. So that's a minus. I am ok with the 5 seating capacity and decent trunk space of the ML however Quote:
Originally Posted by kuttapan I was not impressed by the 2008 MDX. Hard ride, pathetic fuel efficiency, all it had going for it was lot of gizmos at that price.
Things may have changed in 2010, but I say go with your heart, so you will not be disappointed. |
Yeah a lot of options that are available for the ML come standard with the MDX liek leather seats, rear-view camera, blind-spot detection, etc.. but I don't have the experience of driving an MDX, so as u said I dont know much about the ride. The ML's ride is far from luxurious but decent nonetheless. Quote:
Originally Posted by chevelle if i am not wrong, MDX comes with 3 rows of seat while ML comes with 2 rows to seat 7 and 5 respectively. if capacity is important go for MDX.
Personally, i don't like looks of MDX. Prefer ML's elegance. Also performance of ML is better compared to MDX. And status quo for Mercedes is any day better than Acura. 2010 ML has higher grade interior than MDX.
I would vote for ML 350. |
Yep you are correct  But I have seen the 3rd row seats inthe MDX, and they are more suited for children than adults...very cramped with regards to leg space, and as I mentioned above, once you open up the 3rd row there goes the trunk space. But the option of a third row is at least there...in the new ML it's not. The old ML I had driven had the same option, but again I hardly used the 3rd row seats because they are not at all comfortable. Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingspur I really loved Acura's, especially the TL and MDZ, but the new design philosophy or whatever, of sticking a slab of chrome across the grill has really pissed me off. The cars look butt ugly now, and expecially the TL's ruined. So looks wise, no beating the ML. I guess you're going to have to factor in the reliability and cost of ownership etc. Since you previously owned a GL I doubt you'll have a problem with Mercedes or the ML. I vote for the ML !! |
Yeah I hate the front of all the vehicles too... they all look the same. But i'll have to disagree with u about the TL. Are you talking about the latest 2010 model? Coz I think it looks pretty mean! Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmat Am not sure whether a new ML is in the pipeline |
I am not sure either, I was talking about the 2010 ML which is already out. Will have to wait a while before they redo it I guess.. Quote:
Originally Posted by 4x4addict Having owned a ML320 and dealt with Mercedes quality issues, I suggest go for the MDX. |
Thanks for the input. I had no problems with my old ML, but the GL gave me a lot of grief with its transmission, however M-B service was great. It is to be expected when a new model comes out...I should have probably held off but I got it when it was brand new, which is always risky. Note from the Team-BHP Support Team : Please use "Multi Quote" option for quoting Multiple posts, instead of creating another back-to-back post.
Last edited by bblost : 8th December 2009 at 11:58.
Reason: back 2 back posts, please use multi quote instead.
|