The search resumes
The lookout for a new car was interrupted by other factors, but a newspaper ad for the new Harrier this week restarted the discussion. We discussed and discarded it over concerns over quality control and reliability. A shame because it has so much to offer. But not worth the risk when spending north of 30 big ones.
Then we scheduled test drives for the XUV700 and Scorpio-N for today. Coincidentally, today our Fortuner’s clutch happened to fail when it was across state borders, where the car is now spending time in a Toyota workshop. Maybe a sign that we need a replacement?
Here is how the Mahindra test drives went:
XUV700
+High-quality, modern interior
+fantastic performance. The 2.2L mHawk pulled very well from low RPMs, more so than even the Tucson from what I remember.
+modern features including many
nice-to-haves like the panoramic roof, electric handbrake, surround camera and safety features like the blind spot cameras, lane support and - although I didn’t test it out - forward collision warning with automatic emergency braking.
+The rear seat was comfortable, with good legroom and ride quality.
+The boot with the third row folded down was large enough.
+Most of the controls were well thought-out, like the Mercedes-inspired seat adjustment.
-Some others were a little finnicky; attempting to cancel the turn signals would instead engage the lane change signal for the opposite direction. The brake pedal action was very weird and unlike anything I have driven before, probably an illusion but I could not investigate further.
-the useless occupant restraints for the second-row centre seat, inexcusable at the price point and inexplicable when Australia-spec XUV700s get three-point belts with adjustable head restraints. Heck, so does the loaner 2015 Crysta Toyota gave us.
Scorpio-N
+Confident driving position, great visibility
+Performance was effortless
+Speed was hard to notice, a 50 on the Scorpio was much less apparent than the same on the XUV700
+At moderate speeds, the ride quality was good from the driver’s seat. Floated over rumble strips in a way our Fortuner never could. Pleasantly surprised by ladder-frame standards.
-The interiors did not feel modern or special in any way. Except for the tan leatherette the ambience could pass as a heavily facelifted previous-gen Scorpio. Build quality of the interior too was above average at best.
-The rear seat was dull, thanks to the Hyryder-like dark seats and single pane sunroof.
-At lower speeds quite a few bumps and rumble strips filtered through into the cabin.
-Even weirder brake pedal. The top half had almost zero feedback, yet provided braking action. By the time the sudden ‘bite point’ arrived, braking was already quite aggressive, which led to a couple of jerky turns
-The boot was underwhelming. Like, really bad. Almost a deal-breaker. Even with the third row folded down, it was less than impressive. Since we would pick a captain seat version whenever available, removing the third row is not an option.
Overall, between the two I was more impressed by the XUV700. You could potentially put a much more premium badge and get away with it and that is something we are looking for in a family car. AWD or even 2WD is more than sufficient - we’re thinking now that maybe it’s best not to combine the highway cruiser with the off-roader (a small unexciting pre-owned 4x4 might be on the cards for the future to keep permanently where the Fortuner would earlier do duty).
The Scorpio-N lacks the finesse that we are used to from the Octavia and F30. It’s a very good successor to the old Scorpio and as good as it gets when it comes to being both a 4x4 and family car simultaneously, but doesn’t seem to do the latter particularly well, which is expected because that is where the XUV700 is supposed to shine.
In the bigger picture - we would still very much want the Toyota Innova Hycross. We have been very pleased with the Toyota ownership experience for over a decade, and the idea of achieving that kind of fuel efficiency with a petrol engine is the best of both worlds. The car is nice to look at. The interiors are very good, if not as impressive as the XUV700’s. It drives very well and is well-appointed with modern features. It has a large boot even with the third row up and offers captain seats.
The small issues like the useless ottomans and basic entertainment system are liveable, and maybe we might get a not-top variant (thank goodness they all get six airbags now). The major downside? The waiting period. Personally I think it is worth the wait, because we can can afford to since the Fortuner is not going
immediately. But my father is dead-set on completing the deal soon.
The Tucson, we have decided, is simply too expensive for what it offers. Even the late mid-thirties (top variant OTR) would have been a done deal because as a car there is little not to like about it.
We will enquire with the Suzuki dealer about the Invicto tomorrow but I still don’t have very high hopes.