|
Search this Thread | 215,153 views |
7th October 2017, 00:16 | #241 | |
BHPian Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: München
Posts: 358
Thanked: 1,630 Times
| Quote:
Here's the latest news on the Street Triple RS, maybe it's something that interests you https://auto.ndtv.com/news/triumph-s...-india-1759501 Last edited by hifisharu : 7th October 2017 at 00:17. | |
(3) Thanks |
The following 3 BHPians Thank hifisharu for this useful post: | Cyborg, Ricci, shan_ned |
|
7th October 2017, 15:18 | #242 | ||
BHPian Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Chennai
Posts: 25
Thanked: 16 Times
| Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Gannu_1 : 8th October 2017 at 18:37. Reason: Back to back posts merged. Please use the multi-quote option (QUOTE+) while quoting and responding to multiple posts together. Thanks! | ||
() Thanks |
8th October 2017, 17:21 | #243 | |
BHPian Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: München
Posts: 358
Thanked: 1,630 Times
| Quote:
| |
(1) Thanks |
The following BHPian Thanks hifisharu for this useful post: | thevwguy |
8th October 2017, 18:24 | #244 | |
Team-BHP Support Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 8,006
Thanked: 24,079 Times
| Quote:
Either street triple will be a no brained pick against the CBR 650. It's a no contest. I've heard the RS is a bit more track oriented and if you only road ride the S may be good enough. But ride both and take a call. You may also want to check out the Z900 and N1000 if you're in the market for the striple twins. Very competent products at very similar price. Personally my pick would be the striple but it's totally to each one of course. | |
(1) Thanks |
The following BHPian Thanks Axe77 for this useful post: | thevwguy |
11th October 2017, 21:23 | #245 | |
BHPian Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Pune
Posts: 809
Thanked: 1,179 Times
| Re: Triumph Street Triple: Ownership Review
Ah yes, I absolutely did! Quote:
I don't like the TFT screen though, I prefer a proper analogue tachometer, rest can be digital. The full digital TFT makes like someone stuck a smartphone or PSP instead of an instrumentation console. Not a fan of bar end mirrors ( the RS gets factory fittect bar end mirrors) but I think I can live with that, and if I can't, I'm sure an S/R owner will gladly swap mirrors with me. | |
() Thanks |
17th October 2017, 20:41 | #246 | |||
BHPian Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Chennai
Posts: 25
Thanked: 16 Times
| Mod note: Back to back posts, use Multi Quote [Quote +] instead. Thanks. Quote:
Quote:
I agree on the TFT. It seems to be the trend in motorcycling now i suppose. Its a long way to go before we start seeing maps and have intuitive displays. The RS is the naked alternative to the Daytona for sure. Would suit someone who tracks regularly if that is you? Quote:
Sorry if i'm going off topic or if I've missed your cover on this. Just trying to get ur first hand experience owning a Striple Last edited by GTO : 18th October 2017 at 09:35. Reason: Back to back posts, use Multi Quote [Quote +] instead. Thanks | |||
() Thanks |
18th October 2017, 12:34 | #247 | |
Team-BHP Support Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 8,006
Thanked: 24,079 Times
| Re: Triumph Street Triple: Ownership Review Quote:
- Pillion comfort. - Nice engine like an inline 4 or even striple (no parallel twins basically). - Reliable and VFM maintenance. I am going to give my thoughts in the context of the Z900; Triple S and CBR 650. I am not sure how the costs play out in Chennai but my sense would be they are CBR 650 --> Z900 --> Triple S. 1. Pillion comfort I can tell you the Striple is not exactly pillion comfort oriented. I have no idea of the pillion comfort on the other two bikes but if this is big factor, please make sure you get a long enough ride with your pillion on the Triple. 2. Maintenance and upkeep Again, I have no idea on this. I can tell you my first service (30 days / 800 kms) cost me about 7 k or so. No idea on tyre life. Service intervals are about 12 months / 10000 km, which is pretty good. Having said that, while the Kawis might be more frequent, really do balance this out with the upfront cost delta. In Bbay we have a peculiar situation where the Triple S and Z900 are only about 7k apart in on road cost (CKD vs CBU). I believe the cost delta may be much more significant in your state perhaps so your considerations on the two bikes may change. 3. The machine itself Here's the thing - none of these machines will disappoint and you need to ride each one to see which one appeals to you the most at a cost that makes sense to you. The 650 is a stunning bike standalone and admittedly overpriced. But its nowhere comparable to the Z 900 in performance. I have come from 6 years of no riding (and an Enfield briefly before that) directly to a Striple. No reason why you can't graduate from a P220 to any of these machines. I liked the Triple because its very forgiving and easy while you find your feet and yet has the muscle to be very high performance as your confidence grows. Its low kerb weight was another appealing factor in this style of bike. It does heat up a bit but not to an extent that's unusual for this segment. It doesn't have a slipper clutch and the card is not super soft so that's again something to bear in mind - both factors more so if you're going to be doing a lot of riding in heavy traffic. If you can afford it, there's no way you would regret it (pillion aspect aside). On the 650 vs 900 In terms of decision making between these two in particular, I would not be so fussed about ease of service and ownership unless your city is particularly bad. Kawasaki is finding its feet in India without Bajaj - are as invested in this market as any other leading player like HD, Triumph etc and I'm sure the ownership experience would not be too bad. Please bear in mind there are (I'm guessing) a lot more Kawis and Triumphs on the roads than H. 650 so that has to have some bearing on parts availability. Also, rupee for rupee, the market seems to prefer the bigger Kawis to the 650 so you may face a bigger resale hit on selling the 650 (I'm just guessing logically here) Given you intend to use heavily and for a long period, I'd say pick the bike that you feel most comfortable with. Each of these bikes has enough grunt to keep you satisfied within safe parameters on Indian roads. What matters is how they deliver their power in the zone in which you intend to use. For instance if you're going to ride a lot in the city, which one is easier to ride, heats up less, has easier ergonomics, easier for the pillion etc. | |
(4) Thanks |
The following 4 BHPians Thank Axe77 for this useful post: | Cyborg, ethanhunt123, shan_ned, thevwguy |
19th October 2017, 16:48 | #248 | |
BHPian Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: München
Posts: 358
Thanked: 1,630 Times
| Re: Triumph Street Triple: Ownership Review Quote:
a) The number of customers were on the lower side and the service staff were enough to handle those many customers b) I thankfully never had an accident and therefore never had to deal with the painstaking issue of having to wait for parts and the associated woes. For the regular service related issues, everything was done as per the instructions mentioned in the manual. The infamous issue of stalling plagued my bike and many others and other than cleaning the throttle bodies more frequently to combat the issue, the only other solution to the stalling issue is to install a manual idler. The issue was not dealt with the appropriate amount of importance and urgency and all the owners did fel they should have come up with a more robust solution. Service related costs are explained in detail here : http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/superb...ml#post3645860 | |
(1) Thanks |
The following BHPian Thanks hifisharu for this useful post: | shan_ned |