re: Pune : Roads, traffic conditions, route queries and other assorted rants Quote:
Originally Posted by moralfibre - An interesting thing I noticed about the LA Metro and various other transit systems in California like the VTA, Caltrain and BART combination is that of "transit connections". If you have a time schedule for each of these services in your hand, you could travel from any source to destination without an enquiry desk.
The ticketing system was automated, the access to the train station was hassle free. Most importantly, the connections were spot on. If I had a BART connection from Caltrain in 45 seconds, the BART train would arrive exactly in 45 seconds. All I used to do was go to maps.google.com and get directions to use public transport. I hope the design of Pune Metro we get helps us achieve similar standards in public transport. |
- The good things you experienced in LA are a result of their comprehensive/integrated transport planning and that's what other world class cities have done. Particularly London underground is one of the best examples when it comes to connectivity. It's even more amazing when you think that it is one of the oldest system in the world - started about 150 years ago (in 1863). Another good metro system I have see is in Vancouver, Canada. ( SkyTrain). The trains are fully automated, means there is no driver or operator (like London DLR), and you never have to worry when you a miss a train because next train is immediately available in a matter of seconds. Another good example of city trains I have seen is in Sydney, where they have double-decker carriages to handle the large size of crowd. I think double decker carriages would be a good idea for cities like Mumbai. It is unfortunate that our politicians cannot come up with something like these cities. These people also travel around the world, but don't bring good ideas back home. Quote:
Originally Posted by moralfibre - A connection to the airport shouldn't be made in my opinion. Reason? The airport route after leaving Nagar road or Kalyani nagar hardly has any settlement. An exclusive line to the airport is therefore not warranted. What could replace the metro is shuttle service buses from the nearest Metro station (Ramwadi in our case). It would be cost effective and easier to manage. |
- I think the Metro should cater not only to city center, but should cover all the remote areas. The ability to travel fast to city center from outskirts should be one of the main targets for the project. That would ease some of the pressure on our city, as well as the real estate which keeps getting unreasonably expensive because staying on outskirts is not convenient for most people. For example I would prefer living in a nice bungalow on the outskirts than a 2-3 bhk flat in a crowded residential area. Quote:
Originally Posted by moralfibre - You missed out adding the most troublesome destination - Hinjewadi. I feel, the second line after building Vanaz - Ramwadi should be Hinjewadi to Central Pune. That would decongest a lot of roads today. |
- I had Hinjewadi in mind. It's on the green line, but probably not represented well on the map. Quote:
Originally Posted by sajo Instead of investing thousands of crores in Metro , the interim solution to our woes is, well, AC buses. Lots of them. On all possible routes and as much frequently as possible. |
Having more buses is a good idea, but that cannot be the primary mode of transport for the city. A bus whether AC or not is not going to be as efficient in transporting large number of people at a high speed. Buses are only good for connecting areas to its nearest metro station. Quote:
Originally Posted by noopster Sajo, the Metro is not a panacea to cure all ills. Whatever solution we come up with has to be a mass rapid transit system with unhindered access to reduce travel time and attractive enough to get car-users off the streets. AC buses fail big on the first aspect and will require an equally huge investment in the road networks being brought up to speed (dedicated lanes etc.- we know from the BRTS fiasco how that turned out!)
Personally I think any MRT system that neglects fast growing areas of the city while focusing purely on the city centre and surrounds is a fail. Bangalore's Namma Metro doesn't cover Electronics City, nor does the plan for Pune cover Hinjewadi. Terrible planning. |
That is exactly my thinking! Quote:
Originally Posted by CANPUSH The ideal solution could be to run the Metro elevated till Anandnagar on Paud road and put it below ground at the junction where Paud Road splits. It should then run underground till Bund garden to come up again in the elevated form at Yerawada and run as elevated to Ramwadi. This can save all the trees and buildings on karve road, J. M. Road, Ambedkar road and Bund garden road and also save citizens of the trauma of traffic congestion. It will also take care of many other issues like - acquisition of land, permission to cross railway tracks from above, reaching Shivajinagar railway/ bus station, etc. |
Completely agree with you. Hope the people in charge of planning also understand this. Quote:
Originally Posted by dot Mandar, this is one of the nicest post I have seen in a long time. Kudos to your thoughtfulness. I tried going from one part of Pune to another (our usual haunts) using your system and it was pretty effortless. |
Thanks Dot. Probably we have the same "usual haunts" that's why I got it right.
Last edited by MandarMax : 24th April 2012 at 18:24.
|