Re: Aero-Blog : Plane-Spotting, Airports, Cops....!! Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaKilo Klimov and Saturn are my favourite OKB companies!Not to forget the MiG design buereau. My all time favourites from them is the MiG 31 Foxbat or the IAF MiG 25 "Trisonics". |
Great ! another (esp Russian) aviation enthusiast!
The MiG-31 is given the NATO designation Foxhound. Was sad to hear the simultanous retirement of two iconic jets in 2006 - the F-14 Tomcat from US Navy service, and the MiG-25 from IAF service (still flying in Russia and middle-east though ). The choice to have the Superbug succeed the Tomcat was even more wrenching, esp after reading the flaws in the Super Hornet and the pilots and commanders preference for the Tomcat due to its power, speed and range/payload performance over the Hornet/Super Hornet , a few derisively called it Subpar Hornet , I am glad it didn't win the MMRCA bid ! And I am curious as to why in the high altitude trials , only the 2 Eurojets were considered meeting requirements. From what I know, even MiG-21s operate out of Leh, so a MiG-29/MiG-35 and the F-16 should not have any trouble operating out of Leh , they're among the best in the T:W ratios. Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaKilo My all time favourite is Me 262
We do share a lot! I am a Aeronautics bachelors -> Ex-Pratt and Whitney design engineer, upgraded now to space technology. |
Now I am even more in awe of you ! Did you work in military/fighter engines by any chance, F100 series particularly ? Quote:
Originally Posted by skanchan95 The Naval Fulcrums are powered by RD-33MK Sea Wasp engines with FADEC, they are supposed to be less smokey compared to RD-33 powered Air Force Fulcrums and produce 7% extra power. Not sure if the IAF Fulcrums undergoing upgrades to SMT standards are receiving new engines.
So impressed are the Russkies with the Naval Fulcrums that that they are retiring their Su-33s and replacing them with MiG-29Ks for the Kuznetsov's fighter wing.
Correction mate . The MiG-31 is called the "Foxhound" and the MiG-25 the "Foxbat". Pity we did not acquire the Foxhound to replace our MiG-25Rs. While the Trisonics current ride is the SU-30MKI, it really can't match the Foxbat in terms of sheer speed & maximum operational height. |
The Russians are replacing the Su-33 due to its size, their smaller carriers mean more numbers of jets is desired , plus it seems the Su-33 weight hinders take-off payload options.
Quite ironic when then MiG-29 was earlier rejected in favour of the big Sukhoi ! Even the new RD33s are smoky, but visibly less in new build jets. Those are the 2-stroke equivalents of the airborne world !
Trisonics are disbanded, I think , since there's no point having a Mach 2 jet operate in a squadron specifically created for Mach 3 recon jets. We had only 6 (or 8) MiG-25s and all were reconnaissance only, no fighters. So MiG-31 would not be chosen anyway, they are expensive. They may not do Mach 3.2, but MiG-25s reportedly didn't cross Mach 2.83 either unless situation demanded it - like missile threat. The R15 engines weren't capable of sustained Mach 3 performance, they'd soon require replacement with new engines, while the D30 of the MiG-31 can sustain Mach 2.8 which is also the max sustained/redline performance of the MiG-25. I never had the chance to see/hear the Foxbat , must be one amazingly loud jet at takeoff.
Speaking of performance, the P-42 (Su-27 prototype) did make some FAA records still unbroken as of now, after it broke the F-15 Streak Eagle's records. That was pure hot-rod jet, practical military requirements dulled the performance though.
Last edited by Ricci : 30th October 2012 at 11:23.
Reason: Edited to comment on Skanchan's edited post !
|