I never liked G-Shocks, never “got it”: From what I'd seen, just big, ugly, chunky plastic watches that weren't actually as cheap to buy as they looked. I was more oriented to the classics, or modern renditions of military “field” watches, anything unique / funky in Japanese/Swiss, or lately, being in the hills, “ABC” trekking watches from Suunto/Casio/Highgear.
So how is it I end up with one of these in my “rotation” lately?
Well, what is it about boys and gleaming metal in whatever form...???
I was always into watches. As a kid I would save up some allowance money and go down to the local flea market to look for whichever old windup struck my fancy there, most commanding under $10 I suppose. My first job in high school was at a Hamilton factory outlet, this was in the very early years of some kind of relationship with Swatch, which far from being a global conglomerate, at the time were themselves producer only of very cheap, throwaway fashion watches of extremely poor materials and dubious aesthetic qualities. Hamilton was hooked up with Bulova at the time as I recall, but almost nothing mechanical was left by then; so I sold everything from the hideous $30 Swatches to seven-foot-tall grandfather clocks. As for my personal timepiece, eventually I graduated (quite literally, as mine was a high school graduation gift) from second-hand castoffs to a very handsome, slim, rectangular, glittery-white-dialed Hamilton quartz.
The Hamilton sadly met its demise in the washing machine within a couple years, where it astonishingly, completely fell apart – I could hardly believe it. I suppose this is the time when my first Casio – a new model at that time – came in - a Casio F91W.
This one was not going to be destroyed by anything as mild as a wash cycle; I used and abused it for several years. I find it astonishing that a watch that good can still be had brand-new all over the planet for something like $10 U.S. - probably about the same as it cost in 1991 - it must be just about the longest-running and best deal in timekeeping ever. At some point mine was put away in a drawer, having got all scratched up and perhaps with a broken band (weak points perhaps, but for $10 you can't have the world), and was basically forgotten, though I vaguely remember years later finding it again, still working though I'd never changed the battery. God only knows where it is now...
Getting to G's, I still don't see why they need to be quite as bulky as they are, still figure practically speaking that despite being advantageously toughened they probably (disadvantageously) get whacked on doorframes and other solid objects about three times as often as a slimmer watch would. Still realize that any decent stainless-steel watch of half the thickness, with a Sapphire glass and screw-down crown will probably hold up just about as well in any rough use you could throw at it. Still hate the expensive, often uncomfortable proprietary straps Casio insists on using. Still don't see why anyone in their right mind would pay several times the usual price for a particular G just because it came in some limited-production color (as if it costs Casio a bunch to load the injection-molding equipment with some blue beads for a day instead of green or black ones). Some of it is all just kinda stupid hype to me still...
But people just seem to like them a lot, they're highly represented in the police and military, so I selectively picked up a few G's finally, thinking I might re-sell them after trying them awhile. The GA series is one of the most popular, so I started with a GA-110.
Okay, I'll get this out of the way first: Though it looks good, I hate it. Backlight (sexy, I guess, in red?) utterly useless for the hands, and non-existant for the LCD... What the heck??? No solar, so the battery goes down after a year or two, and it's always a risk re: waterproofing when removing and replacing the back. The auto-backlight feature can only be temporarily switched on for this reason, it reverts to manual – which hardly matters as it is only useful for those wanting to look at a red light, caring nothing for what time it is. In daylight, the watch looks good, but I'll be happy to be rid of it – these flaws are just unforgivable in a $100+ watch. It can only be selling on looks alone; I'm just not willing to pay for that, and I get irritated just thinking about it, everytime I think of putting it on again. Very bad call on Casio's part, especially as they had good backlighting on much cheaper watches thirty years ago.
After this, I picked up a very basic, classic (all plastic)-design DW9052 (U.S. Military issue) with Nylon strap, a GAS-100, a G-9300 Mudman (Japanese model with blackout display), and the GR8900. What these last three have in common is that they've got a stainless steel ring for the inner bezel vs. the aluminum or plastic of many/most other G's. I feel that SS may get nicked but not really dented the way “G” plastic sometimes does. They also are all Solar-powered, which I think is helpful if using the backlight a lot (all three of these also have the full-auto backlight feature) and/or in the case of Analog machines, which seem to use up batteries faster than full digitals.
Really liked the Mudman:
It's not too huge, the compass/moonphase/temp are sometimes useful... but I sold it off. For one thing, I did miss having the altitude function, for another, Casio's blackout displays are not very legible compared to Suunto's (my Suunto Observer is just so bright and distinct). Also, in truth, didn't find it all that comfortable on the wrist. Lastly, what I had was a rare piece with some enthusiast value and I didn't see the point in messing it up wearing it in my workshop, etc. Sold it to an old man... who seems to love it!
Also sold off the GAS-100 after wearing it a few times:
I think it's a great-looking watch, and it's got a strong and attractive auto-backlight. I might get another someday, but first of all it IS a little bulky, and secondly, the issue I have with most Analog-Digital displays is that the hands several times an hour restrict the digital “subdials” as they rotate around, always annoying when you want to check the date, worldtime or whatever and can't for as long as several minutes till the hands (especially the hour) get out of the way. Casio made some “duplex” superimposed double-LCD dispalys way back in the 1980's and they were a brilliant solution to this problem, though they are a little limiting in terms of dial design.
The DW9052:
A bit of an ugly duckling IMO, but consistently one of the best-selling G-shocks, they say. Absolutely bare-bones: No solar, no auto-backlight, a kind of scrunched-up look with smallish displays... but it's as tough as any other, more modestly sized (though still thick), and has field-proven creds, sometimes being issued by the U.S. Army itself. Battery probably would hold out as long as my F91's, while the nylon strap makes it look 100% better and is very comfortable. And the thing is lightweight and cheap; you can find them in like-new condition for $20 on Ebay U.S..
So lastly, the one I might keep for the long-run: the GR-8900.
All 8900's are not created equal, and while the standard ones come in a lot of interesting colors, etc, only the GR/GRX(?) (which adds a tidegraph/moonphase), are solar-powered, which I feel is quite important in a zero-maintenance, 100% reliable, year-by-year-strap-it-on-and-forget-it watch. Pretty much relegated to black/white, full blackout, or this black/stainless, which to its benefit works as an accessory to whatever color dress you may want to wear it with.
Everything on the display is always fully readable, the solar and auto-backlight are there, it's got the tough stainless bezel... I think the thing looks a little “robotic” and interesting... so neither overly conservative nor wild. You can pick them up in like-new condition for only a little more than the 9052, so basically it just ticks all the boxes. Yeah, I'm finding this on my wrist a lot lately... and probably am not going to want to let go of it unless I've got another on the way.
So in the end, just a good, basic, very functional watch that should go the distance... as with the .38 Special Smith&Wesson revolver issued to police for generations, it's just a simple, no frills, solid tool that will do the job - if not very glamorously, then reliably and not without a degree of aesthetic balance and proportion. I realize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder... but I have a temptation to call it "iconic".
-Eric