re: The Airtel Thread When I go to somebody's house, I don't start behaving the way I want to. I must wait for the house-owner to let me know what the rules of the house are. Similarly, I don't work for Airtel, nor do I make their rules. So, for me, the rules are what the ARC tells me.
In my previous post, I should have said I got what I wanted by following the rules and due to good customer service. It was because ARC1 had the good sense to look beyond and come up with an alternate solution that Airtel managed to retain a customer. Some of us think what ARC1 did was wrong. In my opinion, ARC1 should be suitably rewarded for handling the issue in a mature and customer-friendly manner. And, those of us who say what ARC2 did was right and that the girl was only doing her job (by using bad language and throwing attitude) should think again. Remember, it is entirely possible to have debates and discussions without getting hyper or abusive. But, thankfully, most of us got the message I was trying to convey.
As someone said rightly, this is what you signed up for. If you cannot handle customers or satisfy their queries, there is no reason you should be in the customer service industry. If you have a bad or abusive customer and you are unable to be assertive and polite at the same time, by all means take it up with your boss and let him handle it (It's even better that he handle it because he may have access to solutions you have not even heard of!). But don't take it upon yourself to fight back brick for brick. Let not your bad attitude come in the way of providing a polite, smiling customer experience. Trust me, it will take you far in life.
Throughout my interaction with the service industry so far - be it airlines, hotels, hospitals, restaurants, banks, insurance, courier companies and what have you - I and my family have had the good fortune of being treated nicely. There have been a few times when the staff at the other end has been rude and behaved badly (like in the ARC2 case), but largely the experience has been good. We once checked into a hotel late night. We were tired and sleepy. The hotel 'rule' said I must fill up the details before we could be assigned a room. But seeing the restless children, they promptly guided us to a room and the entries happened next morning! Similarly, I missed a courier delivery once because I was not at home. I called up the agency and enquired about my package. They said they had it and that they would deliver it next day because the 'rule' said the delivery has to be made at home. Since I was in the vicinity, I visited the agency in person and showed them my ID and address proof. They promptly handed me the packet. Another instance that I recall is when I had to escort a friend's mother to a hospital because he was out of town. His mother fell seriously sick and I took her to the hospital. After she had been wheeled into the OT, the surgeon looked around for 'family' of the patient. I offered myself for anything that was required. He said he can only talk to the patient's family as per the 'rule'. I said I was the only one around since my friend was away. The surgeon then discussed the case with me and advised me about the things to be done.
In all of the above, was the company 'rule' broken? Yes. Did the service provider use discretion? Yes. Did it resolve the situation? Yes. Did the company come to any harm? No. Was the service provider polite? Yes. Was the customer happy and satisfied? Yes. All these situations demonstrate how a 'rule' did not come in the way of solving a problem and nobody lost anything. On top of that, politeness and good manners never offended anyone as far as I know.
As the saying goes: Treat the other person the way you would have him treat you. |