Quote:
Originally Posted by TKMCE Are the ever proliferating Social Media " foodie" groups affecting the business?
I am a member of a few Kerala based ones but find they are fast loosing effectiveness because of the number of biased reviews they get flooded with. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by carfreak My sister in law used to run a cafe in Cochin till a year back, when she had to shut shop due to heavy losses. While the issues were several, one problem she frequently reported were the veiled threats/ blackmails by social media influencers who can make a very strong impact these days. Have you faced any such issues? |
My restaurant is a quick service (QSR) format with no frills and caters mainly to office goers and doesn't attract the food blogger kind of crowd. In my opinion the establishments most affected (either positively or negatively) by such activities are restaurants where people visit not just for the food but also the ambience/experience and hence have a wider array of things to comment on.
Negative reviews are not peculiar to the restaurant business and are just one of the many challenges that need to be tackled. Yes, their credibility is being questioned in all industries as people are (thankfully) beginning to see some of them for what they are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordday What an entertaining reading it was. I enjoyed every bit of it and was able to identify some of the types to myself.
One question - How do you sync the food orders? Many a time I see diners coming after or ordering after me receive their food earlier. Do you club the cooking if the same dish is ordered from different tables? |
Thanks @fordday !
Good question. The general rule as in any other place is first in first out. However there are occasions when one has to make exceptions to this rule. For instance a large group has placed an order, and at the same time a single customer has also placed an order. Now it doesn't feel right to make the single customer wait while the big order is being processed. So we get the smaller out of the way first.
People who come in groups want to be served together (unless they specifically mentioned that it is ok to serve whatever you can make first). Hence we start with the item that takes the maximum time. For example item A takes 10 minutes while B takes 5 mins. We start making A and when it is 5 minutes from completion we start making B, so that both finish together and can be served together.
Another exception is what we call a 'running order'. Example - a customer who has already consumed a part of the meal and wants an extra roti. That customer will get the roti first. To a customer in the middle of a meal, waiting for a refill seems like an eternity while a customer who has not received anything may be willing to a wait a minute more.
Yet another case could be where a person who has come after you has placed order for an item which is made in a different section of the kitchen and that section is free. So he/she might get the order before you. Likewise there are many small complications which can delay an order and may not be apparent to the customer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordday Does it mean they don't want to pay? |
No. It just means they want some privileges which are not available to other customers. It makes them feel good and important. I don't mind as long as they keep coming back and paying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hema4saran With all due to respect sir, most of people have some form allergies in US especially to nuts. It was not part of any attention seeking activities. |
I understand and the post is not intended to belittle anyone. I was merely talking about my reactions from times when hearing about these was very new to Indians. I guess we Indians are made of tougher stuff and can repel most allergies
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar
What does the law state about the taxation part? If a bottle of water with an MRP of 20 is marked as 100 on the menu, is applying an additional tax on 100 considered legal? |
The GST regime in its current form (for restaurants) has been simplified. The govt has removed input tax credit facility for restaurants hence all input taxes in items procured are full costs. So it's not as if restaurants are claiming set off of the tax paid on procurement of the water bottle but not passing it on to the customers. This was happening earlier so to clamp down on the practice the GST was reduced from 12% to 5% and input tax credit withdrawn.
The authorities are not concerned about the breakup of the final item (in your example Rs 20 for the water and Rs 80 for the value added service, whatever it might be). For them the selling price is a unified Rs 100. They are only concerned with whether you are applying the correct GST slab (5% for most restaurants) and are paying to the government what you are charging the customer.
It is left to the restaurant how to charge it. If your menu says GST not included then you charge Rs 100 + 5 = Rs 105 and pay Rs 5 to govt. If your menu says GST included you reverse calculate the tax (Rs 4.76) and pay that to the govt. I follow the latter model to make life simpler for the customer. Moreover, I have stopped serving packaged (MRP) items (for other reasons) so I no longer have this complication in my life. Clean, filtered water is free in my restaurant and anyone can have it !