![]() | #976 | |||
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: BAH / MCT
Posts: 978
Thanked: 5,293 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
To use a car analogy, we say a BS4 Hyundai Verna 1.6 diesel is fast because it accelerates faster than a Ciaz or City diesel. If all the Verna's competitors were sub-7 second (0 - 100 km/hr) cars in the same segment, we would've have called Verna slow. Comparisons are very important and relevant. Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: There is a lot going for India, don't get me wrong. Our economy is very diversified and we have a stronger tertiary and tech sector compared to most other developing economies which generally helps sustain growth, but complacency can be dangerous. Last edited by dragracer567 : 5th June 2021 at 14:28. | |||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 10 BHPians Thank dragracer567 for this useful post: | antz.bin, greenoval, mazealot, Ragavsr, rkv_2401, Simhi, thenewsymbol, Turbohead, V.Narayan, v1p3r |
|
![]() | #977 | |
BANNED Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Chennai
Posts: 481
Thanked: 1,264 Times
Infractions: 0/1 (5) | Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
People in India have a superiority complex despite being poor. Never mind the PM himself thinks the country is a rising superpower while the average per capita income is 2000 USD. People and the government take pride in being the 4th largest economy or whatever but that's a function of 1.3 billion population which is probably higher than all of Africa put together. That actually means nothing for the average Indian citizen. The quality of life and governance is actually not much different between both places. Our economy is diversified because it has no other choice. Africa is rich in resources and they can really prosper if they keep their population in check unlike India where the population is now plateauing and any growth even if small will result in actual per capita income increase. Again it's not as if the country had a per capita income of 10k USD before the pandemic and crashed hard. Growth has been tepid since the start of the decade. Only real positive is there is stability unlike the Latin American countries which have high 10k USD + per capita but are plagued by a weak currency and massive inflation. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 7 BHPians Thank Ragavsr for this useful post: | dragracer567, Lobogris, mazealot, nirmaljusdoit, Turbanator, V.Narayan, v1p3r |
![]() | #978 |
BHPian Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Around
Posts: 112
Thanked: 393 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics
I agree. I am not pinning my hope on any single government, public or private entity etc. has to be collective ,intentional and honest efforts. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks hondafanboy for this useful post: | dragracer567 |
![]() | #979 | ||
BHPian Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: Toronto
Posts: 685
Thanked: 2,591 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
Last year there was lot of noise about how the economy of the United States, as represented by its gross domestic product (GDP), contracted by 32%, during April to June 2020. This was worse than India’s contraction of 23.9%. Goal being to make us look 'less bad'. The devil is always in the details though, posting an article that you may enjoy. Summary is Quote:
| ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 5 BHPians Thank AZT for this useful post: | dragracer567, Lobogris, mazealot, V.Narayan, v1p3r |
![]() | #980 |
BHPian Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 575
Thanked: 2,799 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics I always said we need to consider india as multiple countries and not a homogeneous mass. For example take a look at the data below: GDP of Mumbai is $11830, Bangalore is $ 7110, in between are our other top 3/4 cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Hyderabad etc. All these figures below to atleast the second world economies if not the first world. Even our second rung cities (about 30/50 of them) would have GDP in excess of 5000 usd. The problem lies in rural and semi rural India. Most of these areas especially in underdeveloped states may have a GDP of below 1000 USD leading to an overall miserable and third world GDP figure. The growth of India lies in developing our villages and not our cities. Only when we can increase real farm incomes, stabilize jobs in rural areas, increase education, medical facilities and life expectancy can we look at actual growth. Only making shiny infrastructure in our top few cities will lead to increasing inequality, resentment and conflict. A simple example would serve the purpose. Most of our fruits and vegetables we buy from supermarkets are NOT produced in India. Your Tomato may well be coming from Africa or Pakistan. The locally grown tomatoes will never reach your plate on lack of cold storage, processing and transport facilities. This perverse growth is precisely why the development never reaches rural India. Our entire view of development is lopsided, it begins and ends within a handful of cities. Last edited by AirbusCapt : 13th June 2021 at 08:03. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 19 BHPians Thank AirbusCapt for this useful post: | alpha1, charanreddy, deep_bang, gauravanekar, Gsynch, Lobogris, mazealot, PGA, quickfox11, rijo_tj, sachinb4u, Samurai, sid394, SilentEngine, speedfreak01, Sudarshan42, Turbohead, v1p3r, VinNam |
![]() | #981 | ||
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Dec 2020 Location: Sagara
Posts: 247
Thanked: 1,184 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
I'm sorry for the rant below. --- Indian farmers are riddled with so many problems.
You might start saying APMC etc for fair value, but the money you get from selling is peanuts compared to actual cost of production. Let me give you an example of how much a farmer makes out of each produce (let's forget transport changes).
Quote:
How do you expect this group to pay off for their children's education? How do you expect them to live a decent life? How do you expect them to get a better healthcare? How do you expect them to contribute to our GDP growth? We should provide them the basic necessities for free or increase their earnings. We have done neither. Now you know why our governments bail out farmers year after year with tax payers money. And why farmers still commit suicide. Our per capita income is never going to increase (at least in a meaningful way) if we do not take any action to improve 50% of our populations income in anyway. --- India, is a farmer's country when you do the headcount, but not when you count the produce, land, revenue, or general well being of a farmer. --- and again, sorry for the rant. | ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 13 BHPians Thank prajwalmr62 for this useful post: | AirbusCapt, akhil_007, alpha1, dragracer567, Lobogris, maddy42, Prowler, Seenz, smooth indian, Turbohead, V.Narayan, v1p3r, VKumar |
![]() | #982 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,128
Thanked: 66,165 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
| |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 11 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | AZT, dragracer567, FlashMustang, Lobogris, maddy42, prajwalmr62, sdp1975, Seenz, Turbohead, v1p3r, VKumar |
![]() | #983 |
BANNED Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: Dehradun
Posts: 948
Thanked: 8,337 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Note: These are my personal views, and I seek the suggestions and corrections, wherever felt; by the fellow members. Gentlemen When it comes to agriculture, since I am directly connected to it; would like to talk about what is good and what is bad over here. I will talk the perspective of a medium level farmer from West UP, holding around 10 hectares of land or 120 Bigha of land in local measurement unit. Schemes from the Government (Not going deep, only the ones which are known to all):
Example of Sugarcane:
Total Cost: It consists of 2 costs:
Sowing Cost: This cost includes labour, diesel, fertilizer and cost of seed (which is produced in the farm itself). Where fertilizer is mostly taken by the farmers from their co-operative society, whose cost is deducted from their payments from Sugar mill itself at the end of the harvest, with an applicable rate of interest. Including everything, the cost per bigha of land comes around ₹ 14000 bucks for the best quality produce, it may go slightly higher in the areas with low water table Transportation Cost: Farmers drop their sugarcane at collection centers located nearby, from here the Sugarcane is sent to the mills. For a quintal, they charge the farmers averaging around ₹ 0.66 per kilometer. If the Sugarcane is going to a mill that is 20 kilometers away, the transportation cost per quintal stands at ₹ 13.20 per quintal Returns: The average production I am talking about is of the district Muzaffarnagar, which is good in terms of productivity (Districts Baghpat and Shamli are exceptional), where you can easily achieve a harvest of around 79 quintals per bigha, which is the average taken by 3 biggest sugar mills of the district. Declared FRP by UP Government: ₹ 310-325 per quintal, depending on quality, let's take ₹ 320 for all our calculations, as we have taken sowing cost for the best quality produce. So, for a farmer who is sowing Sugarcane in say 50 bigha land out of the entire piece of land he owns. The Sugarcane production looks like this: Total production @ 79 quintals per bigha: 3,950 quintals Total sowing cost: ₹ 14,000 * 50 = ₹ 7,00,000 Total Transportation Cost: ₹ 13.20 * 3950 = ₹ 52,140 Total rough cost estimate stands around ₹ 7,52,140 for sowing and transporting Sugarcane in a 50 bigha piece of land Total payout for farmer: ₹ 320 * 3950 = ₹ 12,64,000 (The cost part includes all the overhead costs) So a farmer ends up saving somewhere around ₹ 5.12 lac from one season, but they receive this money in small installments from mills, at times, the delay may get as long as 1 year. Now, there are other crops in other pieces of land, and the upper part of sugarcane plant is used as grass for cattle etc. Milk is normally the secondary source of income, along with wheat and rice. Overall, taking everything into account, farmer who is cultivating 10 hectares or 120 bigha of land in my region, ends up making an average income from the land at around 11,000 per bigha taking everything into account - only if the harvest is normal. Drought is never an issue in this area, excessive rainfall and hailstorms can cause serious damage to what crops though. Where's the issue then? The issue lies in the fact the the average land holding in Uttar Pradesh is not 10 hectares per farmer, it is 0.80 Hectares per farmer! And there goes the entire calculation don the drain! The Opportunity?
The income of farmers can be increased by only one method - education
As V. Narayan Sir said, while quoting Dr. B. R. Ambedkar "The best thing one can do to the farmer is get 'em out of farming", while this can't be practically done keeping our National Food Security (universal) and even bigger 'National Food security Act, 2013' in mind (Government has to feed the poor, can't be done on imported ration). But an alteration in this statement makes it a fit for today's scenario "The best thing one can do to the farmer is get a majority of 'em out of farming, make them learn and add diversity in their life fabric by getting jobs outside or getting into other business". Everything has to co-exist, our entire economic system is quite fragile, and we can't afford to have any component of it collapse. The population growth is good for farmers, but we need another set of modified green and white revolution now. There is a huge potential in oilseeds, organic farming, good quality milk is always in a shortage, but individually a single neta or a single society can't bring about the change. We have both tropical and temperate climate together in our landmass in South and North respectively, over dependence on a few crops needs to be cut and a few more are to be added - and that's where the Government's interference is necessary. Amul is a co-operative, but it's made by the Government, the Government, being the main mass mobilizer, only has to step in, there is a huge untapped potential in our primary sector - only if tapped properly. Last edited by VKumar : 13th June 2021 at 19:13. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 21 BHPians Thank VKumar for this useful post: | akhil_007, am1m, avira_tk, catchjyoti, dean5545, DigitalOne, guru_max, headbanger, lapis_lazuli, Lobogris, maddy42, Motard_Blr, mvadg, PGA, prajwalmr62, quickfox11, Samurai, Seenz, sups, thenewsymbol, V.Narayan |
![]() | #984 | |||||
BHPian Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 262
Thanked: 549 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics My views Quote:
Basic economics - The cost to the bank, in terms of time of staff, paperwork, etc. is the largely similar for a Re.1 FD and a Re.100 cr. FD, and therefore they can afford to pay a higher interest on larger deposits. Separately, a customer can definitely try & open multiple FDs, with multiple banks, of less than 2 cr. to get the higher interest!! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If one thinks of it on a very high level, as countries get richer, they tend to lean towards more 'socialistic' policies in a very macro sense, as compared to staying 'capitalistic' i.e. let the free markets decide everything. For e.g. policies such as: 1. Unemployment benefits 2. Universal free Healthcare / universal free education 3. Rental housing policy in Netherlands where city governments created a lot of rental housing (including in the rich areas and not just outside the city), and gives it to people at a 'lesser than market' rental, subject to meeting certain criteria. I saw a place where the LIG & HIG buildings are opposite each other on the same road and practically have the same brick exterior. I'm sure there would be other countries with similar projects. 4. Pension & social security schemes that are getting more elaborate 5. Estate taxes (in some sense penalizing the capitalistic who have accumulated wealth) | |||||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank aashishnb for this useful post: | Samurai, VKumar |
![]() | #985 | ||
BHPian Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: mumbai
Posts: 66
Thanked: 104 Times
| Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
All the countries which have managed to increase their per capita income have done so by making the path clear for economic activities like manufacturing, mining and infrastructural development. In India we often let our perceptions of our culture and propriety get in the way of genuine economic progress. Quote:
Farming alone will not sustain the progress needed for the rural and semi-rural economy. Last edited by smooth indian : 14th June 2021 at 00:23. | ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 4 BHPians Thank smooth indian for this useful post: | AirbusCapt, dragracer567, Lobogris, v1p3r |
![]() | #986 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | Re: Understanding Economics
I will respectfully submit that if we had listened to the good doctor more through the ages, we wouldn't find ourselves in this mess. This country owes much of its decency to him, and to one Mr. VJ Patel. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 5 BHPians Thank v1p3r for this useful post: | AZT, DrANTO, Lobogris, mvadg, V.Narayan |
|
![]() | #987 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | Re: Understanding Economics Well made points on farming here. Along side a lot of demands made here and outside the forum that farmers need to stop farming, i would like to ask what else can he do instead? Our jobs are not keeping a match to the number of people getting out of college, and other than the optimism in certain cities the situation is not so easy to transition without mentorship or guidance. Certain points i would add here:
Buying farm land, depending on the area is becoming expensive. There will be no feasible return for your investment these days unless you look at it as a real estate deal. Small farmers have it the hardest. Under 5 acres is just sustenance in majority of the cases. Unless a lot of rules change in the agriculture sector, things wont change and will just worsen. Maddy |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 3 BHPians Thank maddy42 for this useful post: | m8002?, PGA, Prowler |
![]() | #988 |
BHPian | Re: Understanding Economics The point of moving farmers especially small and marginal ones away from farming has been made a number of times by a number of eminent people. But the change hasn't happened. The reasons espoused are purely financial in nature and in lieu options proposed are that of unskilled labourers. A farmer, big or small, is master of the land he owns. There is a certain pride and free will attached to the profession which is very hard to experience anywhere else.. There is generational attachment to the land, so even in times of extreme hardship a farmer sticks to his land. Afterall you don't sell family jewels for life of servitude. Beside what has been proposed is a by product of last century's industrial farming practices. Times are evolving and detrimental impact of industrial farming is coming to fore. I see a trickle of young blood coming back to the farms loaded with education and assisted by internet to farm in more holistic and nature friendly way and marketing their produce themselves. I feel the age of small farmer may be just around the bend. Ronaldo has just shown us the way https://twitter.com/guardian_sport/s...237411331?s=19 Last edited by PGA : 17th June 2021 at 15:10. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 3 BHPians Thank PGA for this useful post: | avira_tk, maddy42, V.Narayan |
![]() | #989 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() | Re: Understanding Economics Quote:
Heck even in this day and age we have people in my district die on the way to hospitals in Mysore. Maddy | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks maddy42 for this useful post: | PGA |
![]() | #990 |
Team-BHP Support ![]() ![]() | Re: Understanding Economics
Being from traditionally agricultural family, most of my extended family including myself have inherited agricultural land, all below 5 acres after the dividing. However, not one of us are doing agriculture for a living. The economics simply doesn't make sense. So all those fertile land is lying vacant. Everyone is hoping for some big company to come and acquire the land for industrial use. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 6 BHPians Thank Samurai for this useful post: | DigitalOne, Emvi, maddy42, neerajdan, sachinb4u, v1p3r |
![]() |