Quote:
Originally Posted by devarshi84 Honda city as far as I know is not a Japanese specific model and is made in India. we still call it Japanese. I think its a thaiMalaysia based car, Correct me if I am wrong.
The same rule applies to ford. |
True, but the scenario is a little different. The Honda City (OHC) was based on the 6th generation Civic platform using cheaper/mass produced components to keep the car cost down as it was a model targeted at developing Asian markets. It was manufactured out of Thailand & the kits were shipped to India where it was assembled with some indigenous components added on. In any case it's based on a platform developed & sold in Japan albeit not currently so.
As for the NHC this car is sold world-wide including Europe (as the Jazz in hatchback form) & USA (as the Fit in again hatchback form) so should I also not refer to it as a Japanese car?
I mentioned about the Fusion because Ford Europe & USA are two completely independent operations with seperate R&D, manufacturing plants etc. The product ranges are completely different too for eg. the F-150 which is the biggest selling automobile in USA is not sold in Europe, similarly the Transit van which is hugely popular in Europe is not sold in the USA.
Now if the car has no parts from the US, no developmental help from the US & is not manufactured in the US, how can it be an American car? So, would I call the F-150 truck an American automobile? Yes. Would I call the Fusion/Mondeo American cars? No.
Companies like GM, Ford, Toyota are now no longer American or Japanese but MNC's. IMO it is incorrect to term them as country specific since they have manufacturing/R&D/design facilities in various countries and are no longer concentrated in one country/region/continent. Some people might like to refer to them as American brands but in the current scenario that is no longer correct.
You don't call Nike/Reebok american shoes do you? Or McDonalds american burgers?
Last edited by iraghava : 3rd October 2006 at 16:44.
|