Re: Volkswagen Vento : Test Drive & Review Quote:
Originally Posted by oxyzen
MJD vs TDi Let me share an unbiased view. The Germans are best in Diesels and TDi is nothing less. The MJd from fiat is also exceptionally good.
As for the Swift with its 1.3L MJD the major problem is turbolag. But then you have a strong midrange and a reasonable top end. Truth be told the 3 cylinder 1.2L Polo TDi is simply rubbish. It has a turbolag so huge that it takes eternity to reach the turbo zone. Then comes the refinement which is horrible. Even the vibrations are annoying.
Coming to the 1.6L TDi, which is definitely miles better than the 1.2, also has several areas of improvement. Like the refinement, the vibrations in clutch pedal, and then the oil consumption. These are rough edges that needs to be sorted out.
But lets get over the nitpicking and get to the point.
Turbolag - Cant really call it turbolag as it is as fast as a regular petrol in the bog zone. And this is the biggest advantage over the MJD.
Then it is not the power and torque figures that matter. The instantaneous acceleration available at the tip of your feet is awesome. Even the Verna with higher power ratings does not feel that eager to sprint.
I am not sure how the 1.6L MJD will perform but I think (looking at the power & torque figures) it will also have the lag as well.
The tuning (lag vs boost), the gear ratios in the TDi is awesome and I believe even the MJD 1.6 will have a tough tome matching it.
BOTTOMLINE -
The 1.6L TDi has no competitor in MJD department. So why bother.
The 1.3L MJD is far superior to the 1.2L TDi. |
if you compare apples to apples then 1.3 MJD as you say correctly is far superior to 1.2 TDI.
similarly in my earlier posts which got deleted and had vital engine details of both 1.6 TDI and 1.6MJD it was clear that MJD wont have any lag as well.
infact MJD delivers more torque than any TDI right at 1500 rpm.
this applies to both 1.6 lts as well as 2.0lts.
so 120bhp @4000 rpm and 300nm torque @1500 rpm which is better specs than out vento 1.6 Tdi will never have tough time to match 1.6 TDI.
same with 2.0 litres category. Quote:
Originally Posted by .anshuman Why do you think MJD is more advanced? Multiple Injections per stroke?? Every new CRDI engine has this these days. MJD was a awesome engine when it came out, but now the game has moved forward with Engines which are more more eager to revv with much better spread of torque.
BTW i20 CRDi has the most refined and revv happy Diesel amongst hatchbacks, and if it had shorter gearing, it would have been at par in gear roll on acceleration too. Amongst the Sedans this side of 10L, Verna has the most refined engine.
The reason why 1.6 TDI sounds louder under the hood of Vento is cost cutting in sound damping(Still it is quieter than any MJD equipped car especially under load) . Go through International reviews of this engine fitted in various cars, you will hardly find anyone complaining. In terms of Driveability/Performance this engine definitely superior than any MJD equipped car sold here. |
obviously there are multiple injections, but can you mention TDI engines with 8 injections per cycle?
revved much better - you are comparing just 1.3 mjd ? do some research about 1.6 MJD and you will know how it revvs and the torque produced across the range.
with bonnets open do check how a TDI and MJD engine sounds. dont bluntly blame it on damping. it is never quiter than any MJD, be it without load or be it with load. i will park both the cars with open bonnet and post the video with sound when i get my delivery of vento.
comparing the cars sold here, again you are being irrational in comparing 1.3 with 1.6.
Last edited by amit_mechengg : 8th November 2011 at 22:04.
|