Quote:
Originally Posted by sumeethaldankar I mean passengers can't unlock or lock their respective doors seem absurd. |
Passengers can indeed unlock their doors. They can't lock them. Quote:
Originally Posted by architect 1. The EPS: Is it really bad? How would you rate the steering feel on this one, especially at high speeds, since you have already mentioned that the ride and handling is second only to the Fiat Linea. | Quote:
Have things changed from the Polo. IIRC steering was not a complaint there.
|
Nope, things haven't changed from the Polo. Steering isn't bad per se, but the expectations from a Polo (and its commuter engines) are different than the Vento (and its stonking diesel). I prefer pure hydraulics in my fast German sedans. The steering is on the lighter side at speed and no feedback either. The Linea's unit remains the best this side of 10 lakh rupees. Quote:
Originally Posted by Ary10 It would be interesting to know 0-100 performance figures of Vento Diesel. More so. when the engine specifications of Jetta Diesel( Old and New ) and Vento Diesel are almost similiar in terms of BHP output and are identical in terms of Torque.Both vehicles share the Torque of 250 NM at 1500-2500 rpm, notwithstanding the fact that Jetta has 2.0 L TDI engine and Vento has 1.6 L TDI engine.Given that Vento weighs 1220 kgs (High Line) whereas Jetta weighs 1420 kgs, the Vento clearly has favourable power to weight ratio,ceteris paribus.As a natural corollary, Vento's performance, at least in theory, ought to be equal or better than Jetta in 0 to 100/120 category. If this turns out to be true, then Vento should return mind-boggling performance figures.Just to get a perspective, according to ACI, Jetta accelerates from 0-100 in 11.94 sec. Given that Vento is 200 kgs lighter, it ought to better Jetta performance by a wide margin. No wonder people reviewing Vento Diesel are going gaga over it. I am just eagerly waiting to test drive Vento to see for myself how it performs. |
Nice post. Was the ACI timing for a DSG though, or MT? Quote:
Originally Posted by Mpower Job of the Trendline is to pull you into the showroom and the job of the HL is to seduce you once you are there. |
Well said! Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc Wonderful review GTO.
How is the rear seat space compared to the Octavia? |
Noticeably better. Quote:
Originally Posted by nowwhat? If the Polo 1.6. petrol reaches 100 kmph in 11.1 seconds and others who have received it have said that it is sluggish in the start, does it mean that somehow the acceleration picks up in subsequent gears? |
What it means is that the engine's response at low rpm isn't good. You need to be generous with your accelerator input. Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginathom Come on... did you mention Skoda's A-S-S reputation? |
Sure did. And told them that the after-sales could be a worthy differentiator in choosing VW over Skoda. Hope they realise this. Quote:
Originally Posted by adimicra Simple request for some objective comparison of all the petrol cars in this segment in terms of outright performance, driveability, refinement etc. |
A quick attempt:
Quality : Vento > City > Verna > SX4 > Linea
Interior space : ANHC > Vento > SX4 = Verna > Linea
Petrol engine : ANHC > Vento > SX4 > Linea = Verna
Diesel engine : Vento > Verna > Linea
Ride & handling : Linea > Vento > ANHC > SX4 > Verna Quote:
Originally Posted by ampere How pronounced is the axle hump at the back? |
5 - 6 inches in height. Not a bother if there's 2 on the backseat. A headache with 3. Quote:
As per your review ICE is average. How can one change, but one wants keep the Highline variant as well.
|
Same way I did in my Civic. Do look up the thread for pics. Quote:
Are 15 Inch tyres good or its worth upgrading to 16? Any thoughts?
|
16s would look swell |