Quote:
Originally Posted by tsi_niks1989 5. Build- Car feels well put better, doors are lighter than Polo/Vento but still much ahead of what Koreans or Japs give. Few inconsistent gaps can be seen though. The 5 star safety rating from GNCAP for MQB-IN platform cars-Taigun/Kushaq recently was the final flourish needed. Thank you VAG for not diluting products for India data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15ff6/15ff67cd0c2f6003dd121d93ce6ef50ba4f05fbf" alt="Clapping" . |
Thank you for the concise report.
I took quite a long test drive of both the Virtus (1.0 Topline AT- 40 mins- Apple auto VW Whitefield had no 1.5 DSG test cars) and the Slavia (1.5 DSG- 2 X 45 mins- the folks at Raja Skoda Whitefield BLR were incredibly eager and patient). I even drove one of these to my basement and parked it next to my 2018 Verna 1.6 CRDi and my wife's 2011 Fabia 1.2 TDI and did a thorough back to back.
The door thud and heft is identical to my Verna's. In fact the handle on the test car was rattling (test car had 8k kms on the clock). The Fabia is at another level when it comes to perceived build, it is abank vault on wheels.
Interior build in terms of fit and finish and materials used is comparable to my Verna's, no wow factor here. Interior space is cavernous, so is the boot.
Leather seats were OK at best and the Aircon also was alright, seemed to get the job done.
Sunroof operation was glitchy on the test car.
While the 1.5 is a technological masterpiece, it did not give me the "fizz" at city speeds. Highway speeds is where it is at with this engine. Post 2k RPM it pulled very nicely even with 4 people on board, I was impressed. During my test drive, the FE being displayed was around 8.5 km/l.
The ride is fantastic and I would give it a 10/10. My Verna is also a 10/10 but my car had fresh Conti UC6's, barely 2 weeks old, at that time, so the ride on the VAG twins in my opinion is the segment benchmark.
Handling, I cannot comment on because, lets face it very few of us reach the limits of a car during test drives, or even over the duration of ownership of their own car (handling and grip are two separate things, in my opinion).
What I can comment on is the sense of
stability and confidence the chassis inspires to carry on at speed (steady state grip, if you will). With a Ford Fiesta classic 1.6 SXi as my benchmark (10/10), I would give my Verna a 7.5/10 (8/10 if you upgrade the tyres
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e13f9/e13f952d7725b3bbc2939446cf28d4982f5f55bb" alt="Smile"
),the City a 7/10, the Vento a 9/10 and the Slavia/Virtus an 8/10. The Verna loses out only on high speed ride over poorly made expansion joints and mid corner bumps when it is fully loaded with 4 PAX. There is very little between these cars when it comes to straight line stability.
My observations are based on driving all the cars mentioned above back to back at some point
I have been tempted to sell my diesel car, to take advantage of the sellers market out there and rid myself of the predicted risk of owning a diesel in a large city in the future AND get myself a high revving refined and powerful turbo petrol in return.
However after having driven every new sedan on sale in the market within my budget, I have come to realize that they offer nothing substantial over the cars we already own and simply not worth the additional outlay.
All in all, I have decided to hang on to my Verna
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ec0d/6ec0d907ec78d9953cc5996a630b993a94881f0d" alt="Cool"
.