Firstly thank you for all the insightful responses and apologies for not responding earlier. Had to go thru some 'taxing' times and was also under the weather for a bit. Interestingly as part of indexation calculations I checked the numbers between 2009 (when I bought the SX4) and 2024, and ₹1 in 2009 is appox. worth ₹2.50 now, so the ~ ₹8 lakhs I spent on the SX4 in 2009 is worth Rs 20 lakhs now, which squares well with my budget!
Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles101 Variant wise if one can live without those features, then Luxury or Luxury O is a more sensible choice to save some moolah.
The Diesel AT is a Torque converter so reliability is also better. Mileage wise there shouldn't be much difference between iMT and AT.
Kia dealers allow PDI. No hassles in that. Also no issues in getting outside insurance while they do try to push the insurance they sell through their partners.
Sales experience is pretty good and they keep to their word on the timelines. Accessories can be chosen based on personal preference. My top suggestions would be mats, dash cam, door edge guard and sill guard and car cover.
Service experience has been ok for the first service for me. Pickup and delivery from home.
Extended warranty is worth it.
Applying any sun film is illegal. Already there are sun shades in the Carens. |
Thanks for all the details esp. re the interactions with dealers. I've already experienced what has been mentioned in this thread previously i.e. when I reached out to Kia customer care just to seek confirmation on which Carens variants have no sunroof and an automatic, they redirected me to the nearest dealer! So I have very little hope that Kia customer care is anything more than a redirect-to-dealer automaton, which is fine I guess if their dealers are all great - but can we really trust that will remain the case over the lifetime of the vehicle.
Would ideally like to take the highest variant without the sunroof and I think if that's Luxury then so be it, because I think the Luxury (O) and Luxury Plus have a sunroof. The other thing I don't like are the tray table and air purifier behind the driver and front passenger seat (which are from Luxury onwards) as they don't seem useful and take up valuable leg room. Have you found them to be useful at all?
Interestingly, while the extended warranty (MCP Plus?) is available on all variants, the Kia Connect program is only available on Luxury and upwards variants. Frankly I don't want/ care about connected car features but would like to understand how well they work and do they use a connection from a terrible network like Vi?
Petrol DCT is out for me as it comes with the sunroof, so am going to check out the petrol iMT due to my lower running needs - more on that later in the post.
Lastly re the sunfilm, I understand it's not legal and Carens does get sunshades on the rear side windows but I will probably just add them anyway on the sides and back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillMan Carens was spacious and comfortable to sit. But the engine felt very underpowered. The bhp torque numbers on paper seemed gross mismatch. On untared roads with inclination there were wheel spins. Mostly my drive will be in hills so this didn't make sense to me.
If you choose Carens, I'll suggest the AT variant.
I finally pushed my budget up and went with XUV700 AX5. Little less luggage space and features compared to Carens, but it gives a whole lot better vibes. The engine pulls a fully loaded car effortlessly. |
I wanted to understand which variant you experienced wheel spins on steep roads but you have responded below it was the Diesel iMT so thanks for that - more thoughts on that further below. The XUV AX5 is not for me due to the sunroof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time_Machine I feel XL6 suits your requirements very well. There is no other car that has UV/IR cut glass but not sunroof, can seat 6 in comfort, comes with Maruti's bullet proof reliability, awesome fuel economy, has TC automatic, etc |
Thank you for responding but I think it depends on body size/shape and for our family I don't see how the XL6 offers comfort for 6. Three of us (me, son who's technically an adult and 6', and daughter) tried out the various seats and none of them could be called 'comfortable', with underthigh support being the main problem, and leg room in the last row.
The UV/IR cut glass thing seems mandatory in our climate and Kia has added/ removed this from Carens variants as per earlier messages on this thread which is not good. 'Solar glass - UV cut' is available from the Prestige Plus variant I think but its not clear if that also stops IR. In any case, although not strictly legal, I would be up for adding a high visible light transmission film on the sides and back, while leaving the front untouched,
Quote:
Originally Posted by 07CR Carens makes sense for your use case. My other choice would be a Verna/City if you are fine with the ingress/egress. As a Kia Seltos Facelift (DCT Dec 2023) owner and Kia Sonet iMT owner (2021) from Pune can help with your questions-
This link will help you with variant comparison- https://www.kia.com/in/our-vehicles/...are-trims.html. The sunroof isn't available with Luxury + D AT. The iMT would have it though. I would go with the Luxury + since the price difference isn't huge, but the equipment list is quite comprehensive. OTR, the price difference is 1.4 L.
No idea on DPF, but in my limited research, with frequent short city runs, you might face DPF issues.
Fuss-free service and sales experience. I have serviced my cars at Crystal Kia, Aman Kia and Dhone Kia. Splendid experience all over.
They might provide better strengthening to the shell, just like they did with the Seltos and Creta facelift. ADAS too is expected and few more features. I suggest wait for it, even if it arrives and you are not happy with the sunroof variant, you can always ask for pre-facelift cars, which would also have healthy discounts.
I have been getting my insurance from Acko. I was firm with my dealer, they either match it or I would go with Acko. The dealer tried their best but could not match Acko.
Hope this helps! |
Thank you, particularly for details of your experience with Pune dealers because Kia customer care is obviously useless, so it all hangs on how good the dealers are. Insurance I would just like cashless at all Kia workshops, does Acko give that?
I think sedans like Verna/City are right out, both due to ingress/egress and inability to seat 5 in comfort. I think its very interesting that the percentage of vehicles with back seats that can seat 3 comfortably has steadily shrunk over the years even while customer body sizes (!) and heights have steadily increased. Earlier we had some hatchbacks (Indica) and sedans (Linea) that could seat 3 people in reasonable comfort but now there are almost none. I blame the designers and customers who think the outer shape of the car, the curves and the window lines, are more important than the comfort of the people sitting inside. I would like someone like Pratap Bose to be put in the back seat of one of the cars he designed with very high sills in the rear windows and driven around a congested city for a whole day
The potential for DPF issues with short city runs and the price are prompting me to also look at the Carens petrol iMT variants.
Is there any timeline for the new facelift? If it has better safety, particularly for the bodyshell, would hate to miss that. From what I've read so far, it seems the new facelift will only be out next year but that would be too late for me as the SX4's registration expires this year and don't want to get into the hassle of renewing it. The SX4 is also not E10 compliant, let alone E20 which is coming in Apr 2025, so I'm keen to not push it on too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillMan Good to know that. You are used to your car, have driven more and know it better
My impression is from 30mins test drive on a 2km stretch. I was driving a 2022 Diesel IMT Prestige Plus variant. It had run around 12000kms only. It was a well maintained car and I had booked it with Spinny. Cancelled it after the test drive.
I drove through some rough patches and good roads. Including stop and go on some muddy inclines. The Carens specs are higher than Duster and I was only driving two people in Carens. The suspensions and seating comfort on all 3 rows are great and it has decent boot space for a 7 seater only comparable with Innova.
The wheel spins on mud/gravel inclines could have been the result of iMT choosing to release the clutch at its will. Or the lighter weight at the front. It was not confidence inspiring to me, given most of my long trips are to hilly region where roads are not all tarred and need to crawl at slow speeds. IMT was my first experience as well. I must say it was intuitive to use though. It will be boon in city traffic. |
Hmmm lots to think there, glad to hear the iMT was intuitive, I am a little concerned how it will deal with regular western ghat roads, particularly when wet in monsoons. Not really going to take it on any muddy inclines (although you never know when a western ghat road gets muddy in the rain!).
There isn't much information on how the iMT in the turbo-petrol Carens behaves other than in regular level roads, e.g. does it have hill hold, does the clutch release 'intelligence' take into account inclination and load, etc. Only option seems to be to take a good test drive under various conditions. Although I do think that iMT with the new turbo petrol 1.5l engine should be able to handle such situations better than a diesel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SithDefender Sunroofs that can be completely closed, like the Elevate/Compass/Hycross are good, because you can close it when it's too sunny, dusty or rainy. Whereas the Hyryder/Grand Vitara are glorified nets that offer little respite from the heat. Driving down a series of curvy mountain roads with a panoramic sunroof in mild drizzle and watching those drops on the roof accompanied by good music and friends is a totally different experience. Of course, it's completely your wish!
I would disagree with you here. I felt the Elevate was very spacious, what with Honda's incredible space management inside, but the Creta felt wider and had more shoulder room.
Can you elaborate a little more on this? I felt the XUV had one of the best interiors in crossovers, and punches well above the price bracket. I even felt it had a better interior than the Invicto/Hycross. What did you feel was disappointing?
Citroen C3 Aircross can be tested out once, since it's the new kid on the block. As sedans go, the erstwhile Nissan Sunny was properly spacious, huge boot and no sunroof, with a reliable CVT that matched your choice of transmission. You should be able to get a great deal on used choices. |
I think a panoramic sunroof is great in some situations, its just the other situations and possibility of failure that bother me!
Re Creta vs Elevate rear seat space - so we did the same test in every car that we checked out. Me, son (ref 18yrs, 6' tall) and daughter sat together in the rear seat and subjectively decided how comfortable we felt compared to the others. Carens was the clear leader, with XUV7OO a close second. Its a little hard to say why the Elevate felt better than Creta but I think it was the legroom and under-thigh support, but both were very close.
Re XUV interiors, maybe it was just a lower trim variant because we went from the Kia showroom straight to the Mahindra showroom and the Carens Luxury Plus we saw had a subjectively better interior than the XUV7OO (which was maybe a AX5 or AX7), possibly due to the light art. leather covers in Carens vs dark fabric ones in XUV7OO. Another thing was the rubber covers over the ISOFIX mounts in the XUV7OO were cheap rubber that was poorly printed - I think it was a very subjective decision so don't read too much into it.
Citroen/ Nissan - I really don't want to chance it with these brands that are just scraping by, no matter how great their vehicles might be!
In the most recent sprint backlog grooming session (with apologies to non-IT folks!) the home minister has clarified that:
(i) the boot must be at least as big as the SX4 but with the possibility of folding down the rear seats to get back the flexibility we lost when we sold the Wagon R, and
(ii) should be able to seat 6 (!),
so looks like my choices are fewer, which can only be a Good Thing.
In any case, the next step is to take a test drive of the Diesel AT and the Petrol iMT and figure out whether the 6 lakhs (or as I've started thinking now, 2 years of college tuition) are really worth it. Petrol DCT is out as it only comes with the sunroof.
The Petrol iMT is only available with the new 1.5l turbo-petrol engine and not with the older 1.5l NA engine, so there are unknowns with the new iMT transmission and the new turbo petrol engine to deal with. I've never drive a turbo-petrol before so the lower mileage and higher maintenance costs are concerns for me, given that our usage is predominantly in Pune city with its wonderful traffic and roads.
Would love to hear from anyone who has the Carens with the newer 1.5l turbo petrol with iMT about their driving experience (esp. with congested traffic and hills), mileage (esp. in city) and reliability (although might be a little early for that).