My experience after driving the Verna diesel for about 50kms-
The model was the 1.6E version. The car had run 35K kms and was a Zoomcar.
The positives-
1. The engine-
What a beauty! The way it pulls in the 2nd gear is addictive. Only the VW 1.5 TDI is more explosive than this engine. The pull is strong even in the 4th gear. I remember having driven this engine is the previous gen Elantra and didn't find the engine too exciting. Maybe it was the added weight or maybe it was because I was also comparing it to the Jetta. I could feel that the 0-100 timing of this car was very close to that of the Figo but the Verna gets you there with much more drama due to the turbo kick in the second gear. The 6th gear makes it a relaxed cruiser. The overall drivability is better than my Figo 1.5 diesel.
2. The gearbox-
A smooth shifting unit.
3. Build quality-
Second only to the VW group cars in the segment.
Some neutral points- 1. Steering-
Could have had a better feel. Though it was much better than some other Hyundais I have driven including the Creta.
2. Pedal travel-
I felt that both the clutch and accelerator pedals have a long throw when compared to my ride. This holds true especially for the clutch.
The negatives- 1. The space-
The space at the rear is less than my Figo when I adjust the driver's seat according to my driving position. And that is saying something. Due to the rear seat's more than average recline angle, the fixed rear headrests are more usable than my Figo.
2. The horn-
Meeky, is how I would describe the horn. Only the cats and dogs of the road will give you way with that horn. Pathetic is how I would actually describe the horn.
3. Vibrations and engine noise-
Yes, you read that right. Hyundais are known for their refinement and the 1.6 has been praised enough in this forum for a long time. However, at idle I could instantly notice the high engine noise and the vibration throughout the car including the door handles and the steering wheel. I was actually surprised by this as I was expecting it to be super refined. I remember having test driven the previous gen Elantra with this same engine and the Creta as well. While the Creta felt alright, the Elantra was definitely a very quiet car. The sales person kept repeating about the Elantra's triple insulation or something like that. I had recently driven a friend's Creta 1.4 Crdi and found it much more refined that the Verna 1.6D. As the RPMs build up, the situation gets much better but it was still not as impressive as I thought it would be and the NVH was still higher than my Figo by about 30%.
Is this how refined the Verna diesel actually is? Or was this particular car, a perfect specimen of an abused usage of a rental vehicle? I have seen a couple of posts recently where the owners are not too happy with the NVH level of their Verna diesel.
Anyway, after hopping back into my car, I was missing the turbo surge of the Verna. Also, I was going too hard on the clutch and the accelerator after having driven the Verna. The gearbox required a fair bit more effort to operate than the Verna. That is how the IB5 gearbox is. It is fine on its own, but once you start comparing it to some of its rivals, cracks start to appear in its armour. Having expereinced the Verna's NVH levels, I was super-impressed with the NVH of my car. You can feel the vibrations at idle only if you press your hand firmly against the armrest. The steering has practically zero vibrations. Maybe I have under-estimated the refinement of the 1.5 TDCI since the time I have had this car. Last but not the least, the steering of my Figo felt heavy. Having owned the previous gen Fiesta, maybe a drive in the Verna was needed for me to realise that I drive a Ford after all which is supposed to have a heavy enthusiast oriented steering

.