|
Breaking new boundaries! TATA cars have been breaking new norms with safety and features yet being value for money offerings. At the same time they are heavy and lack enthusiasm when you floor the pedal. That's what got us thinking with the dynamic yet potent TATA Hexa 2.2 MUV. The high scores with safety, comfort and features make more sense if engine response and performance got stronger. So, we quickly put a plan together to make the 156hp 400nm Hexa, get into a whole new level. A completely redesigned intake system, full exhaust system, tune enhancements, intercooler upgrade with an all new induction layout etc ensured we removed the lag, increased performance right off idle till redline and turned it into a proper hooligan! So much fun that it's properly quick with its 200+ hp output at crank (195whp) and can shatter the performance of even more expensive cars in its class. The super potent and nimble chassis comes alive with the extra power to powerslide and sprint fast in a straightline too. This is completely contrary to what anyone would believe a TATA can do, but with the performance boundary unlocked, it's at a whole new level! |
Originally Posted by ram87pune
(Post 4767676)
Guys latest news on Hexa BS6 is that 2 engines have been made as of last week .. |
Originally Posted by condor
(Post 4774755)
Thanks, Ram. One question - I believe these will be modified versions of the current BS-4 unit that's doing duty ? A new engine would mean too much expense ? |
Originally Posted by ram87pune
(Post 4774831)
Yes these are the same Varicor 400 engines doing duty in the current Hexa with the addition of an LNT. Also the BS6 motor is expected to produce the same 160 bhp/400nm output as before. So whereas Tata needed nearly 1.5 years for the BS6 conversion of the 2.0 Multijet, they are able to achieve the same for Hexa in less than 1 year. |
Originally Posted by ram87pune
(Post 4774831)
That's why they can get away with having just an LNT for such a large engine is what I am told. |
Originally Posted by Reinhard
(Post 4775095)
(At the same time - God should give TML a slap on the wrist at least, for initially not readying this engine in time. Seems they had thought of junking it first & with MJD2.0 in Harrier they saw the value of own engine. :D) |
Originally Posted by padmrajravi
(Post 4775110)
Does it mean BS6 Hexa will not need an additive like Adblue? That is some achievement if it becomes true. The general consensus was that some kind of additive will be needed for all engines larger than 1.5 L capacity. |
Originally Posted by Reinhard
(Post 4775142)
Yes, if its an LNT, it won't need AdBlue. Why exactly has it been mentioned generally that the LNT is better for smaller engines? I have never fully understood it. Is it because of the cost involved in making an absorbent with sufficient area of the precious metals (Rhodium etc. on plates) for the amount of exhaust gases from a larger engine? If the 2.2Varicor was already EuroV compliant from start without an SCR like mentioned by @ram87pune, achieving BSVI without an SCR might have been relatively easier per se. |
Originally Posted by shramik
(Post 4775201)
Please excuse my ignorance, but what does LNT stand for ? |
Originally Posted by shramik
(Post 4775201)
Please excuse my ignorance, but what does LNT stand for ? |
Originally Posted by Reinhard
(Post 4775206)
Lean NOx Trap. A more sophisticated catalytic conversion that specifically absorbs (by reacting with) the NOx from exhaust fumes of lean burning engines like diesel engines. |
Originally Posted by shramik
(Post 4775208)
Thanks.My understanding is that this device reduces oxides of nitrogen by adsorption, which means it must have some form of "adblue" type of injection. I also understand that all BS6 compliant (diesel) engines must have urea/water injection. I am willing to be educated! |
Originally Posted by Reinhard
(Post 4775142)
Yes, if its an LNT, it won't need AdBlue. Why exactly has it been mentioned generally that the LNT is better for smaller engines? I have never fully understood it. Is it because of the cost involved in making an absorbent with sufficient area of the precious metals (Rhodium etc. on plates) for the amount of exhaust gases from a larger engine? |
Originally Posted by dearchichi
(Post 4765162)
The cost of a vehicle needs to be judged on the service it provides, that is, in terms of cost-per-kilometer. Assuming the Hexa rolls out of the factory with a running life of 200,000 kilometers, the following gives an estimate of the vehicle in the secondary market. |
Originally Posted by Rahul Rao
(Post 4775227)
LNT's inject diesel in the exhaust to reduce the trapped NOX having an effect on mileage. SCR's inject Urea which is less than half the cost of diesel. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:44. | |