Re: Maruti S-Cross : Official Review My uncle in A'bad wants to change his car and his contenders were the newly launched Creta and S-Cross. He asked me to review both the cars in available engine formats and provide my opinion. Since I recently moved to Swift, I am not at all inclined to buy either of the Compact SUVs. Could not test drive Creta due to time constraints.
I managed to test drive S-cross 1.6 and 1.3, both in top trims :
First, the S-cross 1.6 :
1) Vibrations were evident, specially just off idle when I started to drive the car from standstill. Managed to stall it too, which is rather rare for me.
2) NVH. Does not justify the price tag. MSIL had sufficient time to work on this. Engine noise is way too much apparent for a modern car costing so much.
3) Excellent ride quality. But the JK tyres on the S-cross were making a lot of noise. The sales person confirmed that there are few customers who were ready to cancel the booking if the car came only with JK Tyres.
4) Space is nice all round.
5) Excellent seats. Very good thigh support. I am slightly on the heavier side at 90+ kg as of now. Yet found them accommodating and supportive.
6) The car does not have massive presence, but its not small either. Not exactly high, but good enough.
7) Very nice front visibility. Driving my Swift after S-cross was like I am locked down in a dark room. But the refined nature of Swift's petrol motor more than made up for it.
8) Engine : Surprisingly, never thought I would say this, but the 1.6 felt ordinary at low engine speeds. Yes, once the rpm needle started climbing, it was more of a smile on face, but for day to day driving in relatively dense traffic, this could be bothersome. Make no mistake, this motor has full potential to be highway beast.
9) I expected brakes to be better.
10) Very easy ingress and egress. Not too high, not too low. Very practical.
11) Very nice build. Much better than any other Maruti on sale ( except CBU products ).
Nice but certainly did not feel worth the money thanks to a) high price, b) Noisy motor, c) Turbo Lag.
The S-cross 1.3 ( only engine and drive quality part as other points are mentioned above ):
1) Engine is as well tuned as in Ciaz. Yes, turbo lag is there, but its surprisingly more livable than 1.6. No vibrations.
2) Engine noise apparent and the presence of diesel under the hood is felt all the time.
3) Felt more responsive overall as compared to 1.6. If major driving is going to be in the city, I would suggest 1.3 over 1.6. 1.3 seems sufficient for the task, though not as extra ordinary as "Nexa".
Other points :
Maruti has made a strong effort for Nexa. The sales persons were just bit more sophisticated than regular Maruti showrooms. The guy with whom i was interacting told me that 1.3 S-cross as "Super Turbo" against Ciaz having just Turbo. This is because they wanted to give SUV power to S-cross. He could not explain further and I did not want to ask further.
S-cross could be a nice product if NVH were better. The euphoria of getting a Swift has settled down in me and I can confirm that Swift petrol felt much, much more refined than both, 1.3 and 1.6 S-cross specially at lower rpm range. Its true that S-cross is diesel, but the price of S-cross is way too high as compared to Swift and expectations would naturally be more from S-cross.
Overall, a strong, practical car let down by incredibly high price ( for what it offers ) and noisy pair of motors.
Ciaz diesel V/S S-Cross :
For me, I would go with S-cross for dynamics and easier ingress/egress. For social status and boot space, go for Ciaz diesel. Infact, Ciaz felt more "upmarket" from exteriors than S-cross.
Additional Info : Cant confirm or be very sure, but the sales person did tell me that in early 2016 Vitara is going to be launched.
Last edited by aaggoswami : 8th August 2015 at 19:57.
|