Quote:
Originally Posted by nasirkaka Another alternative for your requirement could be used Versys 650 for around 4L. Cant go much wrong even with a used one, as the engine is well made and bike can go on and on for lakhs of kms. |
Good point. I have followed three separate threads on Versys here, all fascinating and fantastic to say the very least. Even though I can't afford it yet, my mind has done the Versys vs V-Strom comparison many times over, without having ridden one, forget about just sitting on it. I'm not sure if one would be so easily available for 4L but since you brought it up, I'll be sure to check it out.
Even so, I have an affinity towards "easy/cheap-to-maintain". That's why I've been thinking about "made-in-India" at this point, where I know I can afford what comes later, after a purchase. Yes, self-service is one route which can significantly reduce costs though.
Quote:
But If you have to choose between 390adv and interceptor 650, you will have look inside and figure yourself as a rider. Whether your style/preference of riding is high revving bikes which are super fun and best enjoyed in the power band, or relaxed torquey engine like that of interceptor.
|
Look within you say - being brutally honest, I've always loved what the Duke 390 offers, and now that it's come in a newer and more suited-for-India avatar, I've already got a soft corner for it.
At this point, I'm restricted to one bike only. Ideally, I would've liked to have them both. While I don't really mind high revving bikes, the concern I have there is vibrations and that, even over 50kms, can be a "buzz"-kill. That's what concerns me about the Adv 390, based on what I've read and seen from reviews.
Quote:
Weight is another factor, the less the better for offroad riding aka 390 adv, and the heavier interceptor may feel more planted on the highway. Ergonomics and riding triangle wise, both bikes are similar with a slight forward inclined upper body posture, and similarly placed footrest. some if it can be customized to an extent with after market accessories.
Suspension is an important department and interceptor may not be very comfortable on bad broken roads. 390Adv is been conceived for adventure so would obviously be better on suspension. Looks wise, one is typical british retro, and other is typical KTM dna and both have their takers. You will have to decide your pick.
|
At this point, I'm not big on off-roading, though, being human, I'd love to have the
option of being able to do that at least. Following your's and Red Liner's trail journeys, it has created an itch to attempt and learn riding on tougher terrains though.
Ergos are important for me more from a 2-up riding perspective. As a rider, I can see myself being comfortable on both. But the suspension setup, coupled with ergos for the pillion, definitely adds points for the 390. But there are umpteen accessories/mods for the 650 to improve ergos, e.g. bar risers, pillion footpeg extender, seat adjustment, windshield, etc, all at additional cost. Not to mention, the suspension may also need tweaking/upgrading given what everyone says.
Looks-wise, I have no preference. One has charm, while the other is a more mean-looking tall-boy.
Quote:
As you mentioned your primary requirement is touring, for which the 390 adv definitely works better then interceptor in general. But only if it was that simple as choosing a bike is got a lot to do with where your heart lies. You could also modify the interceptor with large windscreen, risers, seat mod, suspensions, luggage provisions etc to improve its touring capabilities. I tried doing that with my interceptor, and feel its much improved for touring then the stock bike. sharing some pics for ref.
|
I have followed this thread keenly, so I'm aware of some of the mods you have done
I guess only a test ride of the 390 will solve this internal debate. Having already ridden the 650, that engine is just butter smooth.
If KTM can buy that from RE and fit it on the ADV, all's well