Re: Bajaj Probiking Launches The Kawasaki Ninja 300 @ Rs. 3.50 Lakhs Quote:
Originally Posted by dkaile Great photos moralfibre.
Could you throw in a comparo with the Ninja 650 as the difference is just 2L, just for the sake of it? |
I believe most save for Rishad Cooper from ACI revealed the truth.
The 250R/300R are scaled down Super Sport Bikes. They are meant to be hammered on track or on those canyon rides with curves or if you are a committed rider, you would love to tour the entire country on it.
Choosing between both is easy if you know what you want.
The 650R is an all rounder rolled into one. A very good Motorcycle. The other Indian launch which maybe termed better to it is the Suzuki Bandit.
I am taking the liberty in guessing that after the initial novelty of the new bike would wear out, you wouldn't take it out much (that Superb & Fortuner are in the garage as well) Something like a Harley or a Ducati would make for a better preposition I think. Not that the 650R won't fit that bill, but those bikes might suit your needs better.
I would say try taking test rides on bikes you think you like & are in the ballpark of your budget. Should help in clearing a lot. Quote:
Originally Posted by sarsh11 The only problem I have with the bike now(apart from the no abs) is the poor workmanship on the welds. There were cracked welds on the stand, and huge uneven bulges all along the frame where they were welded. The welds on my 20 year old RX100 look cleaner in comparison.
Hopefully the actual bikes come with more refined work.
6 Bikes ahead of me in the queue, so I'll have to wait a minimum of 60 days :( |
Congratulations! Hope you get your bike soon.
From most reviews it appeared that the bike had very good finish. Even Deepak (pulsurge) posted pics which hint at good quality.
It was interesting to read your condensing views on it. Thanks for sharing :-) We need more like you. Very few on the forums have guts to admit that the automobile they have chosen & are about to pay for has a bit of flaw  Its not worth bothering though (the flaws) Quote:
Originally Posted by sameer kumar I quite agree with you. What makes the 300 stand out is the lines. Somehow honda bikes miss those lines and cutting features. This alone is a plus point going for the Ninja. Performance wise Ninja will always score over Honda cc per cc in whatever capacity you compare. As for the 300 though it appears an all out sports bike but the clip on handles are set up pretty high compared to other track machines. This makes city commuting and touring pretty comfortable. |
Save for the 250 where there is no competition between a CBR-250R and a Ninja 250R, I can't think of any other Honda Motorcycle which is slower than a Kawasaki. This year's 636 sure has an advantage over other regular 600's, but would you call a difference of .0001 fast over competition? Quote:
Originally Posted by akshay4587 Having ridden the 650 for a good distance,i can relate to what you just said,650 is meant for munching miles in a straight line,as tourer it is an excellent machine,but at 210kgs it is not meant for corner carving around the track,a friend owns a Ninja 650 and a CBR 250,and he finds the CBR more fun on track than the 650,and N300 should be anyday better.
At 0-100 in 4.xx seconds for 650 and 6.XX on the 300
and 210 top end for 650 and 190 for the 300,i would say 300 is no slouch,and keeping in mind that majority of Indian buyers are sucker for fully faired bikes,i think the 300 will do pretty well than the 650. |
+1. |