Team-BHP > Modifications & Accessories
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
89,257 views
Old 25th March 2009, 15:08   #16
BHPian
 
siddartha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bangalore
Posts: 671
Thanked: 24 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaraka View Post
Thanks Siddu,

How about isuzuki gypsy

Dwarak
apt name dwarak.

i would like to see what happens on the inside , positions of the 2 gear levers, and the cutting and welding reqd etc if any .

Last edited by siddartha : 25th March 2009 at 15:12.
siddartha is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:09   #17
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayD View Post
All the best for the project Dwaraka. Any specific reason for going the MPFi way? The carb version makes 11bhp more and should be easier to install and work on right?
JayD,

Carb Engines were little old and thought of technology obsolesence for parts availability in future. Hence, made choice of mpfi version - bharat III supposedly. The dealer offered to take out MPFI kit and fit regular delco distributor on this engine. I thought of modification to gypsy not engine, hence retained the MPFI.

Mpfi gives 88 bhp I pressume, is more than sufficient power for off roading.

Dwarak
dwaraka is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:12   #18
Team-BHP Support
 
Rudra Sen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 11,732
Thanked: 6,813 Times

I think I've offended dwaraka. No reply to my post..
Rudra Sen is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:13   #19
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggu View Post
Why would you want to convert a 4x4 to 4x2, esp since you do offroading. the power advantage somehow doesnt ring a bell for me, and a diesel would have atleast given you good low end torque compared to petrol? am confused.
Jaggu,

As I mentioned earlier, the gypsy offers best mod opportunity, because T-case is divorced. Only change will be that , T-case position moves backwards for few inches and the connecting rods will get reduced in size from gearbox. But the connecting rod between T-case and front differential will increase in length by few inches too.

Offcourse I will retain my 4 WD with more power.

Dwarak
dwaraka is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:15   #20
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudra Sen View Post
I'm going to disturb dwaraka regularly from now on.
RudraSen,

You are welcome to disturb .

Dwarak
dwaraka is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:16   #21
BHPian
 
siddartha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bangalore
Posts: 671
Thanked: 24 Times

haha ok , what you chop off from the prop shaft from gear box , you can weld that bit on to the prop shaft going to the front diff, plain ol cut and paste , lol .
siddartha is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 15:18   #22
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrous View Post
Since it has a divorced Transfer case, it should be a matter of aligning prop shaft and adjusting length, i assume.
Nitrous,

You are right there. Alignment and length must be perfect.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudra Sen View Post
I think I've offended dwaraka. No reply to my post..

Rudra Sen,

Sorry for late response. Not going to be affended sir. I am sport.

Dwarak

Last edited by khan_sultan : 25th March 2009 at 15:25. Reason: back to back posts
dwaraka is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 16:27   #23
Senior - BHPian
 
phamilyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 5,976
Thanked: 4,670 Times

All the best. This is an awesome mod.
phamilyman is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 16:34   #24
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

BTW, I must thank Arka a.k.a. ex670 for his advice to go for Isuzu engine and gearbox. Else, would have been in circle of decision on baleno, gypsy king and so on.
dwaraka is offline  
Old 25th March 2009, 18:09   #25
Team-BHP Support
 
Jaggu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 20,400
Thanked: 16,944 Times

alrightee you are retaining the 4x4, good move

MPFI torque rating can someone confirm since IIRC engine and gear box were detuned/ratio changed, even the amby's required I gear to have a clean pull from stop compared to the previous carbed once?? Diesel though used to be a torque bomb.
Jaggu is offline  
Old 26th March 2009, 11:05   #26
GTO
Team-BHP Support
 
GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 72,580
Thanked: 317,207 Times

Wow, seeing these pictures brings in me a feeling of Déjà vu. As you know, I walked the same path with my Classic. The end result was a disaster : an overheating, mechanically faulty unreliable Jeep with no option of 4x4. You can say that the 2.5 diesel transplant brought my Jeep back from the dead. I don't mean to discourage you but just hope that you / your mechanics adopt an expert approach to making this work. Did you consider selling your 1.0 Gypsy for a 1.3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaraka View Post
Mpfi gives 88 bhp I pressume, is more than sufficient power for off roading.
Nope, the MPFi is rated @ 74 BHP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaraka View Post
BTW, I must thank Arka a.k.a. ex670 for his advice to go for Isuzu engine and gearbox. Else, would have been in circle of decision on baleno, gypsy king and so on.
Arka's suggestion is reassuring. He played a significant role in convincing me to go in for the 2.5 XD3P diesel.

Good luck, Dwaraka. I'll be watching this thread closely and hope that your Gypsy comes out with better pep, while retaining reliability.
GTO is offline  
Old 27th March 2009, 16:29   #27
Senior - BHPian
 
nitrous's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UAE/Lon/Madras
Posts: 6,965
Thanked: 332 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO
Wow, seeing these pictures brings in me a feeling of Déjà vu. As you know, I walked the same path with my Classic. The end result was a disaster : an overheating, mechanically faulty unreliable Jeep with no option of 4x4.
As far as the Gypsy is concerned, you can plonk in almost any engine (few parameters need to match).
nitrous is offline  
Old 28th March 2009, 17:02   #28
BHPian
 
MexXxentric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 248
Thanked: 11 Times

One of the Raid de Himalaya vehicles had a similar set up (1.8 Carb engine.)
Dwarak, u can discuss with the owner (Mr.Mitesh) for info. on his vehicle.
I've PM-ed you his contact details.
MexXxentric is offline  
Old 30th March 2009, 11:53   #29
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

GTO,

Thank you for your suggestions. Appreciate the concern.

Mexxxentric, Thank you.

Dwarak
dwaraka is offline  
Old 30th March 2009, 12:38   #30
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,240
Thanked: 229 Times

Hi All, Here are pictures of 28.3.2009 with engine mounting testing.

Dwarak
Attached Thumbnails
Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_730.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_731.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_732.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_733.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_734.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_735.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_736.jpg  

Gypsy Powering up with ISUZU 1800 cc Petrol engine-image_737.jpg  

dwaraka is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks