Team-BHP > Modifications & Accessories
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
143,229 views
Old 29th December 2007, 11:33   #256
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyneverdie View Post
too much money and energy has been spent on the car's looks :- i personally would have spent more on performance

but not to take anything away from you man , nice ride -preffered the yellow and yes man over time hook up a spoiler

over time sell it tooo

i believe end of 2008 the new lancer is coming to us--144 odd hp , turbo charged : they say chassis and structural rigidity is up more than 50 % over the cedia

but *^#% that enjoy the ride mate

Thanks for your advise would have gladly spent on performance BUT there is sadly not enough options available for the Lancer other than the MIVEC transplant route, However whatever was available on the performance front has been done right at the onset.

Believe me the car is probably one of the best performing Lancers running a stock engine.

I have been drooling over the new Lancer launch, will surely be buying that as well - funds permitting.

Cheers
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 29th December 2007, 19:02   #257
BHPian
 
harmon_bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madras
Posts: 542
Thanked: 17 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky_63 View Post
Thanks for your advise would have gladly spent on performance BUT there is sadly not enough options available for the Lancer other than the MIVEC transplant route, However whatever was available on the performance front has been done right at the onset.

Believe me the car is probably one of the best performing Lancers running a stock engine.

I have been drooling over the new Lancer launch, will surely be buying that as well - funds permitting.

Cheers
Ricky which model of the lancer is being launched in India? Any pictures of the car please...

Thanks.
harmon_bro is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 00:45   #258
Senior - BHPian
 
BUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,130
Thanked: 21 Times

Ricky your car is looking awesome, you have some excellent tastes when it comes to mod, and i suggest you get the spoiler, it will look awesome. Badboyscad's PS job shows how fantastic the spoiler looks.
BUSA is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 11:04   #259
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Thanks Busa. Glad you like the car...why is it that no one responded to the Charity Fund for putting up the spoiler ??? I wonder
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 12:15   #260
Senior - BHPian
 
BUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,130
Thanked: 21 Times

Quote:
why is it that no one responded to the Charity Fund for putting up the spoiler ??? I wonder
If thats the case, car looks much better without the spoiler
BUSA is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 14:20   #261
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

@Busa

How come you did not reccomend me to get it Petefied Just kidding I know Peter does not have any boxes for the petrol Lancer (wish he had though) LOL

Hey how about high lift cams ? Do they do anything worthwhile for the 1.5 Lancer ? What about a standalone or something with bigger injectors ?? Just thinking aloud.

Cheers
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 14:24   #262
Senior - BHPian
 
BUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,130
Thanked: 21 Times

LOL Ricky

Quote:
Hey how about high lift cams ? Do they do anything worthwhile for the 1.5 Lancer ? What about a standalone or something with bigger injectors ?? Just thinking aloud
A standalone and better cams will surely make the car quick, but with high lift cams your car will idle rough and low end driveability will decrease, though once the Cam kicks in your car is going to fly.

RDs Standalone ECU's are pretty good, you can use that even now sans a Cam and your car will be slightly quicker. Also it costs just 25k, kind VFM if you ask me.

Infact RDs Standalone is equivalent to Petes Box for petrols

Last edited by BUSA : 30th December 2007 at 14:26.
BUSA is offline  
Old 30th December 2007, 14:31   #263
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUSA View Post
LOL Ricky



A standalone and better cams will surely make the car quick, but with high lift cams your car will idle rough and low end driveability will decrease, though once the Cam kicks in your car is going to fly.

RDs Standalone ECU's are pretty good, you can use that even now sans a Cam and your car will be slightly quicker. Also it costs just 25k, kind VFM if you ask me.

Infact RDs Standalone is equivalent to Petes Box for petrols

Well have been in touch with Kartik. Apparently he is unable to send the ECU down to Delhi as the tuning would be an Issue and the ECU is no good unless it is setup properly. Even Arush had spoken to him but somehow did not workout YET.

Seems like I may start looking at the MIVEC option or even an EVO all wheel drive setup ONCE I get bored of the present setup Charity anyone ??? LOL LOL

Cheers

Last edited by Ricky_63 : 30th December 2007 at 14:32.
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 19th January 2008, 19:01   #264
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Hey Guys,

Any idea how a Mitsubishi 2L Twin Turbo (OE) would be in terms of maintainence / performance vs a MIVEC 1.6 NA ?? Both being Manual Transmission.

Any informed comments would be appreciated.

Cheers
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 14:53   #265
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times
Mivec Option/s

Hi

I have been offered an option of a V-6 MIVEC 2.0L engine with ECU & wiring, to be mated to my car's OE Transmission. Any comments ? Has anyone used this engine on an Indian Lancer ? I am told it is a bolt on. Will need upgraded brakes & suspension. Everything else remains the same.

How is this as against a 1.6L in-line 4 MIVEC, both engines churn out the same power but the V-6 would have more torque (understandably so)

Comments / suggestions welcome.


Cheers
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 15:14   #266
Senior - BHPian
 
khanak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mumbai/Toronto
Posts: 2,800
Thanked: 273 Times

What is the cost difference between them? I believe Speedzak has a V6 MIVEC in his Lancer and I think Sideways has the 1.6 MIVEC. Have you also considered an EVO conversion with the 4g63t and AWD.
khanak is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 15:17   #267
Team-BHP Support
 
Vid6639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 17,772
Thanked: 43,925 Times

Speedzak has/had the car with the 2L V6 MIVEC. He should have more details.
Vid6639 is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 15:23   #268
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanak View Post
What is the cost difference between them? I believe Speedzak has a V6 MIVEC in his Lancer and I think Sideways has the 1.6 MIVEC. Have you also considered an EVO conversion with the 4g63t and AWD.


Thanks for the information. I did consider the EVO conversion - but decieded against it as the rear sub-frame would have to be fabricated which I thought may be a reliability issue. Also the cost is way more than I wish to spend on it.

Thanks
Ricky_63 is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 18:36   #269
Senior - BHPian
 
razor4077's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,882
Thanked: 299 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky_63 View Post
Hi

I have been offered an option of a V-6 MIVEC 2.0L engine with ECU & wiring, to be mated to my car's OE Transmission. Any comments ? Has anyone used this engine on an Indian Lancer ? I am told it is a bolt on. Will need upgraded brakes & suspension. Everything else remains the same.

How is this as against a 1.6L in-line 4 MIVEC, both engines churn out the same power but the V-6 would have more torque (understandably so)
If I'm not mistaken, the 2L V6 MIVEC (6A12 engine) churns out 200 BHP as opposed to 175 BHP from the 1.6L inline (4G92).
If you don't mind, how much are you getting the engine for (PM me if you like)? What about the ECU and wiring? I think you should verify if the OE transmission can handle this engine.
Keep us updated dude!
razor4077 is offline  
Old 5th April 2008, 19:25   #270
Senior - BHPian
 
Ricky_63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,885
Thanked: 519 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by razor4077 View Post
If I'm not mistaken, the 2L V6 MIVEC (6A12 engine) churns out 200 BHP as opposed to 175 BHP from the 1.6L inline (4G92).
If you don't mind, how much are you getting the engine for (PM me if you like)? What about the ECU and wiring? I think you should verify if the OE transmission can handle this engine.
Keep us updated dude!

Hi

The engine churns out 180 BHP & I have checked - the manual OE tranny can handle the engine power / torque. And yes I am getting the ECU & wiring with it.


Let's see how it goes - the V6 against the in-line 4 - the quotes are still awaited. I will have to change the Rotors & brakes to handle the additional power. I am waiting to get the whole break up of the costs involved (comparetive cost)

Will take a call post all the information getting to me.


@Vid6639

Thanks will try & check with speedzak on his experiance with the V6 engine



Cheers

Last edited by Ricky_63 : 5th April 2008 at 19:27.
Ricky_63 is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks