[kryptonite]

Originally Posted by Vik0728

I am a bit confused here kryptonite.

Did you just run the stock GT TDI using the Vbox or did a remapped GT TDI on the VBox return a 0-100 time of 10.51s ?

I hope it is not the latter !!

This one was Stock. The remapped Polo GT run (from another friend's car) was also put up earlier in the thread - 8.8x seconds. Please check

[kryptonite]

Honda Accord 3.0L V6, 4 speed Automatic:
Stock engine specs: 196 NM, 221 PS
The 0-100 time that I clocked in the stock car with a Vbox: 9.84s


Honda City Old VTEC with Stage1 mods & lightened flywheel:
Stock engine specs: 110 BHP
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked in the car with a Vbox : 8.78s


Skoda Laura 2.0 TDI CR (common rail), 6 speed DSG:
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 440 NM, 185 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock Laura Diesel : 9.72s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped Laura Diesel: 7.86s

Skoda Laura 2.0 TDI PD (pump duse), 6 speed DSG:
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 430 NM, 180 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock Laura Diesel : 11.07s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped Laura Diesel: 8.09s

VW Polo GT 1.6L TDI CR, 5 speed manual:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 330 NM, 140 BHP (updated Tune)

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock Polo Diesel : 10.51s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped Polo Diesel: 8.54s

VW Vento / Skoda Rapid 1.6L TDI CR, 5 speed manual:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 330 NM, 140 BHP (updated Tune)

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock Vento/Rapid Diesel : 11.3s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped Vento/Rapid Diesel: 8.83s

Volvo XC60 2.4L 5cyl Diesel, Automatic:
Stock engine specs: 420 NM, 163 BHP
The 0-100 time that I clocked in the stock car with a Vbox : 10.81s


Mahindra XUV500 2.2L Diesel, 2W drive:
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock XUV500 : 12.34s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped XUV500: 10.33s

Zen with Baleno's 1.6L engine + Esteem's 5 speed gearbox:
Stock engine specs: 130 NM, 94 BHP
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked in the car with a Vbox : 9.73s


Zen 1.0L, 3 speed Automatic:
Stock engine specs: 78 NM, 60 BHP
The 0-100 time that I clocked in the stock car with a Vbox : 19.53s

[kryptonite]

My Suzuki Supra SS with a Stage2 Shaolin engine:
Estimated specs: ~20 BHP
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked in the bike with a Vbox: 10.53s


Yamaha FZ1 with Akrapovic exhaust & sprocket mods:
Stock engine specs: 106 NM, 150 BHP
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked in the bike with a Vbox: 3.27s


Harley Davidson Electra Glide:
Estimated specs: does it matter?
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked in the bike with a Vbox: 6.75s


KTM Duke 200:
Stock engine specs: 19 NM, 25 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 23 NM, 28.5 BHP (updated tune)

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock KTM 200 : 9.52s
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked with a Vbox in the remapped KTM 200: 8.20s

KTM Duke 390:
Stock engine specs: 35 NM, 43 BHP
Estimated figures post remap: 40 NM, 47 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run in the stock KTM 390 : 6.15s
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked with a Vbox in the remapped KTM 390: 5.38s

[vijaycool]

Thanks Kryptonite for posting Vbox results. I too have done similar testing on Gtx, punto 90hp and I10 1.2 kappa. Infact we all surprised I10 kappa has a very potent engine and inching towards gtx run times.

[Vik0728]

Originally Posted by kryptonite

My Skoda Rapid 1.6 TDI:

The 0-100 time that I did on a Vbox at The Valley Run: 8.26s
The Quarter Mile time was: 16.02s

Hey kryptonite I think these numbers are history !!

I guess its about time you post the details/numbers of your latest and greatest Beast.

[kryptonite]

VW Vento / Skoda Rapid 1.5 TDI, 7 speed DSG - Stage1 remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage1 remap: 320 NM, 132 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 12.25s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 8.69s

VW Vento / Skoda Rapid 1.6 TDI, 5 speed manual - Stage2 kit + remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage2 kit + remap: 380 NM, 160 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 11.44s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 7.85s

Skoda Laura 1.8 TSI, 6 speed manual - Stage1 remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 160 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage1 remap: 320 NM, 200 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 8.38s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 7.16s

My Skoda Laura 2.0 TDI, 6 speed DSG - Stage2 kit + remap: (Updated tune)
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage2 kit + remap: 440 NM, 200 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 9.72s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 6.99s

BMW 320D - Stage1 remap:
Stock engine specs: 380 NM, 184 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage1 remap: 450 NM, 215 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures claimed by BMW : 8.0s
The 0-100 time that my friend clocked with a Vbox in his remapped car: 6.70s

[d3mon]

Originally Posted by kryptonite

VW Vento / Skoda Rapid 1.5 TDI, 7 speed DSG - Stage1 remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage1 remap: 320 NM, 132 BHP

Wow, do you know how the DSG is holding up in this car?
Is this one of the first Rapid/Vento TDI DSGs to be remapped?

[Rajeevraj]

Originally Posted by kryptonite

VW Vento / Skoda Rapid 1.5 TDI, 7 speed DSG - Stage1 remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Estimated figures post Stage1 remap: 320 NM, 132 BHP

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 12.25s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 8.69s

Sorry if it is a silly question, my understanding was that the 7 speed dq200 dsg used in the Vento/Skoda could handle only 250nm torque. Wouldn't the 320nm remap make the gearbox prone to failure (Especially considering it's history of un reliability).

[devilwearsprada]

Originally Posted by Rajeevraj

Sorry if it is a silly question, my understanding was that the 7 speed dq200 dsg used in the Vento/Skoda could handle only 250nm torque. Wouldn't the 320nm remap make the gearbox prone to failure (Especially considering it's history of un reliability).

There are DSG Gearbox Maps also, internationally available.

[kryptonite]

Originally Posted by d3mon

Wow, do you know how the DSG is holding up in this car?
Is this one of the first Rapid/Vento TDI DSGs to be remapped?

The DSG is holding up beautifully. Yes, it is one of the first 1.5 TDI DSGs to be remapped. The car has clocked over 20,000 kms already

Originally Posted by Rajeevraj

Sorry if it is a silly question, my understanding was that the 7 speed dq200 dsg used in the Vento/Skoda could handle only 250nm torque. Wouldn't the 320nm remap make the gearbox prone to failure (Especially considering it's history of un reliability).

The unreliability of the DQ200 was never due to it's torque handling capability, but actually due to various other reasons which are publicly documented. All of those issues have been sorted out in the newer cars.

Like the DQ200, the MQ250 used in the manual version of the Vento/Rapid TDI is also 'rated' at an input torque of 250nm, but that doesn't mean you cannot go higher. If you've looked at the dyno graphs I've shared on this forum, we peaked 380nm on my Rapid only for race purposes. It's aggressive, but it's possible, safely. My Rapid has now run 86,000 kms and still running strong, but of course, it runs a street tune that only peaks 320~330nm for street/everyday use.

All engines are gearboxes are built with enough tolerance. Remaps exploit this tolerance. Yes, you obviously need to go higher on torque if you want to go faster, but it all critically depends on how smoothly/progressively that peak torque is built & how long it's held. And to do this well, you need to do a lot of testing yourself. Only a good tuner can exploit the built in tolerance/buffer very well.

[kryptonite]

These times below are from our test runs, 1 day ahead of this event:
http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/indian...ml#post3895426

VW Vento 1.6 TDI, 5 speed manual - Stage2 kit + remap:
Stock engine specs: 250 NM, 105 BHP
Dyno'ed figures post Stage2 kit + remap: 390 NM, 165 BHP at the wheel

Note: The timing below was achieved with a proper race prep & setup, and race tune ONLY.
Does not apply to street setups / regular use.

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 11.44s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the race prepped car: 7.07s

My Skoda Laura 2.0 TDI, 6 speed DSG - Stage2 kit + remap:
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP
Dyno'ed figures post Stage2 kit + remap: 455 NM, 202 BHP at the wheel

Note: The timing below was achieved with a proper race prep & setup, and race tune ONLY.
Does not apply to street setups / regular use.

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 9.72s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the race prepped car: 6.31s

BMW 530D - Stage1+ remap (power figures higher than a regular Stage1 tune):
Stock engine specs: 540 NM, 242 BHP
Dyno'ed figures post Stage1+ remap: 680 NM, 325 BHP at the wheel

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 6.61s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the remapped car: 5.55s

[Vik0728]

Originally Posted by kryptonite

VW Vento 1.6 TDI, 5 speed manual - Stage2 kit + remap:

Note: The timing below was achieved with a proper race prep & setup, and race tune ONLY.
Does not apply to street setups / regular use.[/u][/i][/b]

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 11.44s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the race prepped car: 7.07s

Hey kryptonite, thank you for sharing that data. Really shows the power of engineering.

Any which way one looks at it, Vento generating 390 NM, 165 BHP at the wheel post remap is insane to say the least

And that timing of 0-100 km/hr in just over 7 seconds is almost super car territory. Mind boggling numbers and really showcases machine and engineering capabilities.

[Suraj25]

Originally Posted by kryptonite

My Skoda Laura 2.0 TDI, 6 speed DSG - Stage2 kit + remap:
Stock engine specs: 320 NM, 140 BHP
Dyno'ed figures post Stage2 kit + remap: 455 NM, 202 BHP at the wheel

Stock 0-100 figures as per Autocar's Vbox run : 9.72s
The 0-100 time that I clocked with a Vbox in the race prepped car: 6.31s

So your car is faster than a stock 530D! A 2l 4 cylinder beating a 3l 6 cylinder is just insane!! The C and 3 can't hold a candle to your Laura. Wanted to do a Vbox run in my Abarth cause it feels like it could do 100 faster than the claimed 8.8s. I just hope sub 8 second times are possible after the stage 1 remap!

Btw, got to see your car @ Adiga last week when I came to have a chat with Vivek. She sure looks beautiful! Didn't get a chance to talk to you though. Would love to check your car out in detail sometime

[Pranay J Pandya]

While not a VBox run, here's a 0-100 log from another device which operates much like the way the VBox does. The device is called the Gtech Fanatic Pro RR.


2001 Turbo Honda City
Stock engine specs: 105 bhp
Estimated Turbo engine specs: 200 bhp

Stock 0-100 timing about 10 seconds
0-100 clocked by me as per the log: 5.89s

Gtech Graph:

[Vik0728]

Originally Posted by Pranay J Pandya

Stock 0-100 timing about 10 seconds
0-100 clocked by me as per the log: 5.89s

Is that for real Pranay J Pandya

That is almost BMW M3 territory buddy and we are talking about a mainstream sedan here

Can you please post some pics of the car or at least create a thread of its own to share the mod details?