re: (Skoda) Superb So Far - Update at 2.5 years / 26,000 kms Comparison Test - Superb 1.8 Tsi vs. Mercedes C250 CDI BE vs. Mercedes E200 CGI
I just had an opportunity to test drive the Mercedes C 250 CDI and the E 200 CGI, and compare those cars with my Superb. This was done in the best way possible – back to back drives on the same route in limited traffic.
Let’s start with the C250 CDI. On paper, the specs of this car blow you away. It has a twin turbo charged diesel engine, which produces 204 BP at 4200 rpm and 500 Nm of torque as low as 1600 rpm, and has a curb weight of just 1650 kg. Contrast that with my Superb. It weights about 90 kg less, but has a peak power of just 160 BHP at 4500 rpm, and peak torque of just 250 NM, albeit at 1500 rpm. Of course, the Superb benefits from a 7 speed DSG as against the 5 speed auto in the C. The C is low slung, but finding a good driving position was easy. As I hit a clear stretch (on the ramp of one of the longer flyovers in Bombay) and revved the car, the diesel engine was surprisingly loud. As it gained speed (and shifted up), the engine noise reduced. Before I knew it, I was doing 120 kmph and had to back off as I approached a curve. Of course, this was just me being cautious as the car felt absolutely planted as I took the curve. The driving dynamics were fantastic, as I had experienced when I drove the petrol C class in Scotland. On fuel efficiency, the MID indicated long term level was about 13 litres per 100 km. The interior quality was good (this was the top end Avantgarde trim), but did not seem to be a quantum improvement on that of the Superb, except for the fantastic panoramic sun-roof. The feature list was largely similar to that of the Superb with the only two additional features being the attention assist program (which monitors your driving style, and warns you if there is a major change at high speed), and the ability to activate the hold function by pressing the brake hard (which also implies that the transmission need not be put into neutral at signals). I also did a run in S mode, but could not find any material change in its shift pattern. Some features present in my Superb were missing – most notably the optical parking system. Overall, this is a great driver’s car, and the quality of the diesel engine in particular came as a clear surprise to me. This was clearly far superior to the petrol C estate I drove in Scotland. As in the C estate, rear seat leg room was non existent – in my driving position, someone of similar height (and I am just 5’ 11”) would do well to even get into the rear seat behind me, and would be sitting with his knees in the driver’s back. This certainly is a car meant to accommodate only kids in the rear.
Next, I drove the E 200 CGI. This car was in Elegance trim, and had a normal sun roof. Interior quality was good – I especially liked the black interiors (which are standard for the silver exterior colour). But once again, the interior quality was nothing to write home about and certainly did not make one feel that one was in a car that costs more than twice the cost of the Superb. The real shock however came once I got behind the wheel. On paper, this car should outperform the Superb quite easily. It produces higher peak power (183 bhp at 5600 rpm), and peak torque (290 Nm at 2400 rpm), albeit offset by the higher curb weight of over 1700 kg (I think – the MBIL Site does not list this) and the 5 speed automatic transmission. As I drove up the same route, I was waiting for the surge of power I felt in the C Class (or that one gets even in the Superb as one accelerates). But the surge did not come, and I was probably doing just 90 kmph at the same point where the C had been doing about 120 kmph. The overall feel while driving was not very different from driving the Superb (with even the noise under hard acceleration being similar). The other surprise was that the feature list was not materially different from that in the C Class – optical parking sensors, for example, were still missing. The other surprise was that the handling advantage that even the petrol C Class had over the Superb also seemed to be missing. Rear seat leg room was of course far better than the C Class, but not as good as that in the Superb. In short, while I had stepped into the E Class expecting a car that was dramatically better than the Superb or the C Class, I was disappointed to find that the car was probably inferior to the C 250 CDI in every aspect except space, and did not out perform the Superb either.
To confirm that this was not just a function of my having driven the C250 CDI on the same route a bit earlier, I took my Superb through the same run as well. I still could not find a material difference between the feel behind its wheel compared to the E200 CGI.
I am sure that the E350 or even the E250 CDI would blow the Superb away. I wonder how the E220 CDI (which produces less power but more torque than the E200) would have performed (though the attractiveness of that model is diminished by the low rent single CD change ICE it comes with). Overall, the only reason to buy the E200 CGI seems to be the badge value – if you like to drive and need the space, the E250 CDI is probably the lowest end E Class model that one should consider.
As for my Superb (and I hope people don’t feel this post is OT for this thread), these test drives certainly reinforce my feeling that it offers fantastic value for money (despite all the niggles and issues that one is subjected to from time to time). Prices (as tested, non negotiated, without Starease 3 year maintenance program)
C250 CDI BE Avantgarde: Rs. 39.1 lakhs (OTR Bombay individual) (no discounts available)
E 200 CGI Elegance: Rs. 41.3 lakhs (OTR Bombay individual) (Net price after considering Rs. 3.0 lakh cash discount and Rs. 2.5 lakh BPCL Petrocard that were being thrown in). |