Quote:
Originally Posted by dark.knight @swiftdiesel - Thanks, Laurens van den Acker & J Mays are good additions to the thread as they have fresh ideas of how to re-invent a brand range. The Renaults in Europe look cool and funky unlike the Nissan badge-engineered *fail* models we get here. While Fords new Kinetic design looks great I only hope they don't copy paste it on every car like VW. |
Absolutely agree! Renault has an awesome design portfolio in Europe. Quite an irony to realise that none of the models badged in India as Renault are actually from their stable. How hard is it to localise the Clio or the Scenic? Not sure why.
With Ford, I reckon they're actually aiming for one global design theme according to their One Ford philosophy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dark.knight On a separate topic which I've been reminded of now, some people seem to assail certain brands on copying elements from much more luxurious brands, one example of this is Hyundai which does share elements of Bimmer/Audi, but the way I see it it's absolutely natural because the designers in Hyundai have a past in those two companies. While I do like the Aston Martin-like grille on a Ford, no one has criticised them for the copy just because Ford owned AM at a point (not anymore though). The problem is does the design truly belong to a "company" just because they funded and actualised it? Or is it an intellectual patent of the designer? To me its evident that its an intellectual patent and that's why great designers are hired, to add their touch. Each designer goes by his deepest instincts of what curves and lines should be and no corporate trademark can be put on that. |
The reason why Hyundai and Kia are mentioned in the same breath as other European brands is courtesy their all new design language. Small wonder they opened studios in Europe and "hijacked" some top notch guys (read Peter Schreyer) to Korea. Before Peter was hired, Hyundai and Kia had no sense of design direction. Most of their models went into oblivion since people couldn't put an brand identity behind those designs. Mr. Schreyer started with Kia first and one of his first tasks was to create a brand identity. He came up with this unique tiger grille interpretation, a la BMW's kidney grille.
Kia Tiger Nose/Grill Identity Copyright: Respective Owners
With an all new identity in place, churning out models was a piece of cake for his design team. Right here in Edinburgh, the new Kias look so cool that I need to pass a second glance at them. If not for the badge, the design holds the same European flair as some other premium offerings here. Also I find more people recognising Kia and liking to be seen driving one. His design direction in Kia was so good that Hyundai has made him the head of design for Hyundai/Kia. There are some other (probably his old mates) European guys in his design team.
Likewise, the MINI was brought back to life in its newest retro interpretation by another German, Gert Hildebrand.
Copyright: Respective Owners
His take on the all new MINI was a runaway success that BMW was able to reap rewards for resurrecting an British icon. Different models were spawned off from the same platform and you couldn't mistake a MINI for anything else on the road. In my opinion, that's a tough nut to crack - to create an all new brand identity and also staying true to its heritage identity. He's no more with MINI and currently MINI is adopting a cartoony design theme with oversized lights that lack the flair and elegance of Gert's design. I'm not a huge fan of the recent ones after his departure. The Chinese saw his worth and hired him to work for an all new company called Qoros.
Within months of hiring him, we could see his influence there. He had a play around with the first letter "Q" and came up with an identity that interprets that Q. Very interesting take I say and I like his interpretation on a sedan. Here's a sample image:
Source: gmotors.co.uk
This is th Qoros 3 sedan. You will notice (as you rightly mentioned) influences of BMW design in the rear quarter, especially the tail lamps. Nevertheless, it looks good and gives the car a solid stance. I'm sure that's what the Chinese were after to contend with established brands.
Copyright: Respective Owners
You will notice more number of European designers being poached by Asian companies because they're after the same design flair of established brands.
Yes, it's to hard to patent and car companies are careful to choose their battles. Nobody wants another "Apple vs Samsung" lawsuit happening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dark.knight Also its difficult to patent functional element designs on vehicles & that's probably why companies don't even bother to do so or point out design similarities with other brands. It would be a futile money draining war in court. |
If patenting is the norm, then brands like Mercedes are taking cues from the Koreans! I like Gordon Wagoner for the all new direction he's taken for Mercedes Benz. But I find that the hind part of all his designs aren't cohesive with the rest of the car. They look more Korean and not synchronised with the rest of the design. Check out the CLA's rear for example:
Gone are the tight seamed angular lines of the front. The rear looks bulky, disproportionate and check out those curves. Terrible! It's an amalgamation of a 6 pack tummy at the front and a botox'd butt

Sorry, I'm sure many may like it but I'm not too keen on his rear interpretation. I reckon that's the challenge with most designers: they're able to nail the front with identity et al but the rear always seems like an after thought. Skoda seems to be an exception here with taut looking rears and has an overall pleasing aesthetic design appeal, thanks to Jozef Kaban, another one of my favourites. I'll reserve that for another post but yeah a real interesting discussion. Thanks!