Quote:
Originally Posted by Emvi We are talking about Indian market and the competition...
Nobody is forced to buy anything they don't want. It's we "the enthusiasts" who yearn for the features even in the most basic variant of a car citing safety, comfort so on and so forth....Well, to each his own. |
It is not at all OT, we are discussing how we think the Jimny should be equipped - indeed for a very diverse Indian market - incl. what variants / equipment levels should be offered. Considéring that my part of India has contributed to a fair percentage of sales for the outgoing model (strong right up to the end), I think mine is a reasonable and qualified opinion.
It took someone in H.P. about three hours recently to sell his stock 2019 Gypsy. For 9 (nine!) Lakhs!!! One could ask why the buyer didn't put in some more, and go for a brand new Thar petrol. EMI on a good interest rate and it might even work better than dropping 9L cash like that. For a car with no A/C, rear wiper/defogger, etc. Excellent question, but end of the day, the buyer didn't want a better-equipped Thar, he wanted his Spartan Gypsy. The one with the floorpan metal showing at the edges of the floor matting. Yep.
If we could access more refined model sales data, you would probably find that in the last ten years, Gypsy sales have by far been highest in the hill states/ districts. Same with Bolero Camper and Thar DI, I'd bet. Could mention the base Altos and heck, even Nanos, to make the point. None of these were available with A/C or much of anything else re: comfort/ convenience enhancement. People buy them as local hill runabouts, for their tea estates, commuting to Manali snow-points, etc. And they are so well-suited to these uses! So yes, THAT market (some of which never sees ambient temps above 20-25C) will accept a bare-bones variant, in fact it wants that more than anything else. Best VFM and fewest headaches over the long-run.
"To each his own" is absolutely right, I'm not the one telling anyone what to buy or what features they should be willing to pay for!
But absolutely, if "the enthusiasts" sitting down in the metros with fat salaries are convincing automakers through forums such as this one that even a "base variant" must have all this stuff, then yes, many who till now have been buying the simple cars they want really WILL be *forced* to pay more, for features they don't need - because there is literally no variant which omits the things they don't want.
And hence the whole term "base" becomes meaningless.
Not sure why that's difficult to grasp.
If someone says: "I want a variant that gives me A/C and a rear wiper at sub-8L", that's an entirely different - and fully sensible - kind of statement, the expression of a personal desire, without denying others the option of fulfilling their own aspirations.
I'm 100% for choice and freedom - buy what you want and can afford - but why insist on taking my own choice away, just because you personally in 20 years never turned off your A/C?
I did not at any point mention safety features, you'll note. That would be a completely different question/ issue.
I realize that Maruti may not be aiming at their former Gypsy customers anymore. More volume and money to be made elsewhere. Sad if true.
My question is that if "the enthusiasts" and well-heeled get their way, then what's there for people like us?
Driving across northern UP/BR a couple weeks back, I saw a LOT of the old Mahindra 640/650DP Jeeps in service as share-taxis. They haven't made those in maybe 20 years, yet many/most I saw were in pristine condition. They are highly valued there - and they don't even have proper doors!
We should bear in mind that with all the apparent economic progress the country has been caught up in, the total sales of 8-10L+ vehicles over a five-year period still represents a fairly small percentage of the population.
People are raving/gloating about the sales figures of 15+L cars in India. XUV doing 6k/mo. Nice. But to put it in perspective, the Ford Mustang sold 700,000 units in its first 1-1/2 years of production.
It's not 1965 now, but still nothing wrong with an exciting, stylish, simple, well-built and relatively cheap car.
-Eric