Good decision. If there is any company that can utilise the 2500/ year import rule, it is Toyota. They have a whole plethora of models that could be imported to test the waters.
But in typical Toyota fashion, if they are going to import at full invoice, and let the imports duties take its full toll, then no words.
If they are going to price the Rav4 at the Corolla price range and the mentioned Jeep Compass range, very well. The Toyota badge and the product's capabilities would ensure success.
Though the Rav4 has grown and has become more like the crossover version of the Camry, than the Corolla.
In fact, the present Rav4 shares its platform and engines with the Camry.
My wish - They launch the 2.0l with manual and 2.5l hybrid at the current Innova price range, higher than the competition but at par with Compass, it would be a sales success (imagine Covid-19 didn't happen)
Reality - If at all, Toyota imports the Rav4 under the 2500/ year norm, they will bring only the hybrid version. Price it at par with Fortuner or just below Camry. If it succeeds, then start assembly, use the volumes of scale, as the Camry shares the engine and platform. But then looking at how models like CRV and Tucson are doing. Don't know.
About other global SUVs. Other than the Rav4 and Ch-R, don't know which other SUV/ crossover models would be suitable as a test market exercise under the 2500/year rule. The Highlander would be too big and expensive, not to say it isn't available in RHD.
Edit:- My bad, the Highlander is available in RHD as the Kluger.
Another thing for Toyota would be to bring Noah, Sienta

type ones. They could use the halo effect of the Vellfire.
About Daihatsu derived models, they could have done it ages ago.
Me thinks, the only concrete thing that's going to happen is the upcoming Toyota-Maruti Creta fighter based on the stretched Raize platform.
Anything else is just day dreams or exorbitantly priced CBUs.
