Re: Ford EcoBoost 1.0L overheating woes (UK, SA, USA) Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO Not a fan of the EcoBoost at all. It's expensive, complicated, has lag and isn't as fuel-efficient as Ford would like you to believe. |
Neither am I, frankly. I am firmly in the "no replacement for displacement camp".
And yes, since you mention it, other than the Raptor which seems to do better than the competitors' V8s (but many still swear by V8s, even among F150 owners), I haven't seen downsized, over-stressed engines doing any better in any way - regardless of them being Ford's other EcoBoosts, or Volvo's irritating maximum of 2L 4 cylinders. They are harsher, noisier, and usually negligibly more efficient practically - and actually less efficient when driven hard. Quote:
Not read any reports of overheating on Team-BHP though. Hopefully, it stays that way.
| Quote:
Originally Posted by arunphilip It is interesting that - to the best of my knowledge - this issue hasn't surfaced in India till date, especially given our harsher conditions of traffic, ambient temperature and dust. |
Certainly a welcome surprise given our temperatures and other running conditions. Quote:
Even more so given that the EcoBoost engine in the Indian EcoSport is imported from Europe, and quite likely that same engine plant also supplies the same engine for the UK EcoSport (and possibly even SA).
|
From what I've gleaned (from the parallel discussion of this issue on the recent EcoSport EcoBoost Official Review thread), first batches of this engine came to our shores from Germany, and subsequently Romania. The ones in the UK come from Wales. Don't know the source of the South African problem units.
May be one of the reasons things are okay over here so far.
And while I'm sure the Welsh would take offence at being clubbed with the/referred to as Brits, if it indeed is that only UK origin engines are prone to this, I will say this - if nothing else, it's at least typical behaviour from a product with British craftsmanship behind it. Quote:
Originally Posted by extreme_torque I wonder why then it was awarded the engine of the year in its category for multiple years running? |
Probably because of the way it performs in the F150 Raptor - I think that might be the sweet spot for downsizing. 6 cylinders. Further downsizing probably has not only diminishing returns, but detrimental effects. Just speculating though - don't take my word for it.
But, if you didn't mind, here's a little more speculation. Reports of the new 2.0 BiTurbo on the Ranger Raptor (I know that's a diesel) suggest it is quite the underwhelming engine - especially the top-end poke on a vehicle's Raptor version. I don't think it's coincidence or a tuning issue - I firmly believe that at the very least, 3L V6s should be the limit of downsizing. Quote:
It might be worth retitling the thread though - given the number of incidents reported of engine fires, this isn't just an overheating problem (loss of power, warning lights) but a catastrophic failure with the head cracking and subsequently triggering a fire.
|
That's up to the mods - for my part, I deemed it prudent to go with a title less likely to stir up a fanboys' nest.
Last edited by Mu009 : 8th October 2018 at 12:58.
Reason: Correction(s)
|