Re: Isuzu planning to launch MU-X. EDIT: Launched at Rs. 23.99 lakhs I had a test drive of the Isuzu MU-X (INR 32L), Tata Hexa XT 4X4 (20L), Toyota Fortuner 4X4 MT (INR 38.3L) and Ford Endeavor (39.8L) the last Saturday as I want to upgrade from my 3 years old XUV with 53k on the odo and following were my observations ->
I - Tata Hexa 2.2 4X4 (from Prerana Motors which had an abused demo car)
Pros -
1. Nice sounding system.
2. Good ride though not exceptional like in reviews.
3. High quality interiors.
4. Effective AC.
5. Genuine 7 seater.
Cons -
1. Not as agile as the XUV.
2. Too much noise from engine especially the engine-fan was LOUD.
3. Power delivery is weak at low RPM..
Result - Easy elimination as it did not feel good enough for an upgrade.
II - Isuzu MU-X 3.0 AT 4X4
Pros -
1. Amazing ride quality on bad roads. The long travel suspension absorbs big potholes with aplomb and the low speed ride was just great.
2. Quick gearbox that was slotting into right gear at right time. Good engine response too.
3. Audio system was pretty good.
4. Space in last row was slightly better than other 2 though the middle row is fixed.
5. Solid build quality and fit+finish. Feels built to last and should age very well.
Cons-
1. Interiors look dated and boring.
2. Only 2 airbags.
3. Engine when pushed creates a lot of noise for sometime after which progress starts to follow.
4. Hated the colour of the seats.
5. Steering is too tight around the centre and not that convenient to use in city.
6. Although low speed ride is supple, at higher speeds there is quite a bit of side to side movement and you get a floaty slightly boat like feeling.
Results - This car feels very abuse friendly and might be fun to take out on unknown roads. It does not have WOW factor. Its basically like a completely evolved Scorpio. Might consider it mainly because its relative cheap to buy and maintain.
III - Toyota Fortuner 2.8 4X4 MT
Pros -
1. Looks great in person, I was pleasantly surprised as I felt it looks weird in pics before.
2. Engine is responsive even in eco mode.
3. Everything feels built to last, both the interior and exterior.
4. Handling is pretty good for a ladder on frame as its quite stiff, like the XUV.
5. Mid to high speed ride felt good, such as going over bridge joints, small potholes and road undulations.
6. Liked the dark interiors and its easy to maintain.
7. Special mention for Toyota and Ravindu, the entire process of registering for the TD, getting intimations from the dealer via SMS and email, timely arrival for TD, etc. was so fuss free and the best I have experienced so far.
This makes you feel like you will get good after sales experience.
8. Loved the optitron console with cool colors. Seems funky.
9. Smooth gearbox and loved the iMT feature.
Cons -
1. Important missing features like auto IVRMs, lumbar support, front parking sensors, better rear parking sensors, TPMS, etc.
2. Seats were firmer than normal.
3. Average audio quality.
4. Seems pricey for what it offers. Does not feel like it should cost 2X of my XUV.
5. Average quality of some of the interiors bits as mentioned in the official review. Doors dont shut with the THUD.
Result - Definitely in contention.
IV - Ford Endeavour 3.2 4X4
Pros -
1. Awesome build quality, fit and finish.
2. Exhaustive list of features, with everyone of them feeling useful. Apart from maybe tyres, there is no scope for any upgrades/accessories in the Endeavour.
3. Explosive performance from the engine. This was surreal and hard to imagine how something so big and heavy could move with such speed and agility. This has to be driven to be believed.
4. The cabin is almost sound proof and with very low NVH, driving the Endy is so stress free. Miles ahead of the other 3.
5. Front parking sensors + light EPS + reasonable turning radius + Auto gearbox + parallel park assist make this car very city friendly.
6. Seats felt more comfy than fortuner.
7. Great sounding system + telephony + MID.
8. Great ride+handling combo, almost perfect.
Cons -
1. Not sure if so many features are a good thing or bad as more things could go wrong.
2. Gearbox in sports was not taking gear-shifts as per my command and following its own routine.
3. Poor fuel economy of only 8 kmpl.
4. Not sure about after sales experience and not too many reviews in t-bhp. Getting the TD was not as smooth/easy as the other 3 infact.
5. Ambient lighting should have been extended to the rear.
6. Only 2 years warranty from manufacturers and need to shell out more for extended.
7. Last row is tight on space compared to the other 3. Getting in and out of last row is tedious as well.
Result - Easily the best car among the four and the best all-rounder I have ever driven.
Conclusion - As with so many others, this is a head vs heart battle between Fortuner and Endeavour respectively, with the MU-X as a wild card if I get a good deal.
While the Endy is just the best, I'm worried about plonking almost INR 40L on it.
On the other hand, Fortuner costs less by about 2L, returns better economy and easily gets the best resale value. Now I finally understand why people buy Toyota even if they do not have the best cars in their segment.
What do you guys think?
1. Save money through negotiations and get the MU-X.
2. Go with the heart and somehow buy the Endeavour.
3. Buy the Fortuner looking at the sensibility.
Last edited by Aniket6 : 18th September 2017 at 17:25.
|