Quote:
Originally Posted by ::CMS:: If you want to get hold of a copy of the full judgement, why dont you contact waseem or probably it will be available online from their website based on the case / file number. |
Thanks. I figured that out
. Writ Petition WP 594/2015, and the latest status is "AT REQUEST OF ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL THREE WEEKS TIME TO FILE STATEMENT OF OBJS". The next date of hearing is yet to be decided. The state gets three weeks to respond. Other than that I could not find any "Orders" or "Judgements" in the Karnataka High Court web site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildsdi5530 If the RTO decides to retax KA vehicles, would we have protested so much? Does anyone notice that excise on fuel was hiked by the govt. 4 times in the last 6 months? |
The excise cess on fuel has not led to many protests in Bengaluru. Karnataka people have already paid LTT, so why should there be a question of retaxing. Yes, if the tax rates gets doubled, there would be protests. But right now an average Joe of Karnataka is in the least way bothered. He has a vehicle in Karnataka and have paid the tax. He is not going to be troubled. He may make occasional visit to Kerala, Goa or TN. They don't have such provisions to collect LTT. Karnataka state is just ensuring that all folks who stay in the state pay the LTT. Migrants naturally would be effected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atniya This is a stupid law and enforcement is maniacal. On ground, due to logistics and bureaucracy; people who had no intention of robbing KA RTO are paying up twice and that should not be happening. It is causing major inconvenience to migrants and that's wasn't the intention of the law. That's why it must be repealed/reorganized. |
As per existing legal frame work, Motor Vehicle Taxation is a state subject. So question of robbing KA RTO does not arise. My gut feeling is that Karnataka government realised that in big cities like Bengaluru there are 1000s of private vehicles which run on a daily basis without paying any form of road tax. They amended the laws in such away that these people are forced to pay up. The intention of the amendment seems to be increasing the state's tax revenue (which is obvious).
Quote:
There are still serious regional undertones in the argument of Sachin that other state's RTOs aren't KA state's issues. Migrants should not be treated as immigrants. Getting refund is an issue with all RTOs and the other states aren't other countries.
|
RTOs are state specific organisations, just like the police force, fire brigade etc. Do you think Karnataka is really bothered on how Kerala Police behaves, in their own state? Each state has lots of privileges which it can exercise. Migrants have always been welcomed here. I myself am a migrant. But can migrants be given all sorts of benefits (no tax collected etc.), just because the migrant comes from a state with a sloppy law enforcement or RTO mechanism? Do we get any breaks in income taxes etc.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by silversteed The hon. judge had made an observation in that effect. |
I checked up the internet for the order related to WP 594/2015. Other than adjournment, I could not find any other remarks in that order. Please note that judges to make some
oral statements, which may be critical of the organisations, governments etc. But that is not the final judgement or the order. Those things are always written down, and formally recorded.
Quote:
Could you please show an instance where this procedure has been duly followed?
|
I have seen one major drive which happened near my office parking lot. Four squads in action. In no case were people forced to pay upfront. The RTO collected all evidence (including parking stickers etc.), seized the vehicles and took them to a BMTC bus depot near by for holding the vehicles. The owners had all ways and means to challenge the seizure by providing proof (that the vehicle was not used in Bangalore for more than a month). This is what I saw, and off course things have been different for others. Even the existing law has clearly defined the provisions for appeals (it has to be heard in a higher court than that of a 1st Class Judicial Magistrate). But no one seems to have tried those options.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenmz "Travel once between Bengaluru and Mysuru and you will realise how bad the condition of the roads is. The department does nothing to keep the roads in good condition but is interested in collecting tax." |
That explains. This is an observation made by the judge. I.e a frank remark on the state of the roads. But is it there in the order that RTO (or PWD) has to fix the roads between Bengaluru and Mysuru and make it more comfortable? I don't think so. There is a difference between an observation made by the judge, and the formal written judgement. Based on this observation, there is no mandate for the RTO or State Government to fix the roads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by venkyhere I appreciate your perspective (and the maturity shown by you to present clean arguments purely from a legal perspective, as it should be) in taking the side of the maligned party (a.k.a KA RTO) |
Thanks. To be quite frank, I don't have any thing to lose here, because all my vehicles are registered in KA. Only once the RTO of KL (my mother state) caught me, and they left me after I showed the toll receipts. KL is also interested in revenue collection through fines and taxation. Out of my own curiosity, I try to learn the legal aspects, and the criminal and judicial process in India. But one thing for sure,
"ignorance of law is never an excuse", so it is upto all of us to know the exact nature of rules and laws which govern our day to day life. Only then perhaps people would be forced to ask for corrections. I appreciate the initiative of the folks who approached the courts, in a case where they felt they are being victimised by KA RTO. Now let us see how KA RTO defends themselves.