Quote:
Originally Posted by sourabhzen Please let us know when you are done exploring the options, till then it is a rule and we are bound to except it. Seat belts, smoking and helmets are the rules that harm the person breaking them. SUn film ban is imposed to protect those who fall victim to the illegal activities that happen behind these films. |
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not new to legal arena. Trust me, it's quite easy to sue someone in the US (including the IRS - equivalent of the IT dept. in India) so I won't go there. I took some to courts couple of times in India. Also, cracked a few. Example, one moron demanded 5 lakh bribe to grant me some EoU manufacturing clearance. I went to ACB, helped them to trap him. So you see?
Anyway, where did I ever hint to break any rule?
a) was rooting at lame judgments, without giving any proper thought to state weather patterns and huge financial loss. In the US, tint laws differ from State to State.
b) how rules are ignored (belts, smoking and helmets) or enforced at Traffic police (and/or local Govts) will and wish.
c) based of these rules, how Traffic folks 'milk' people. Even if you have everything correct, they explore 'avenues' to get you! I agree that many people aren't holy cows either (at least 1/3rd break rules etc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourabhzen It is not a lame pretext of security. It is SECURITY. We are a land of 100 crore human biengs and any small security breach puts 100s of life in danger. Not like US or EU where a train derailment may cause casualities in single digit. |
You are still living in the billion keyword. We're 1300 million or 1.3 billion. The US population is 310 million.
a) I don't deny about a few disadvantages with sun films but my point is this judgment doesn't adhere to widely followed International standards (70% & 50%) when we follow them in other cases. Say, Euro ratings for emissions, Basel ratings for banks etc. So why this?
b) Most lame is to remove the film altogether, especially in hot cities with mercury shoots above 40C.
c) This rule goes against saving Fuel (A/C usage goes up), which results in the rise of Emission levels.
d) Obviously, more loss to our FOREX due to losses incurred in (c). It's not that geeky to compute the fuel loss per city.
e) Importantly, this doesn't help to curb rapes because most of them are committed else where (homes, schools, colleges etc). I'll concede that this will help only to an extent in kidnapping etc.
f) One more is most Taxpayers are entitled to protect their hard earned money. Who is going to pay for the losses? Forget the cost incurred on films, at least Ministry or Traffic departments cared to do removal job for free of charge? So people should get pockets burned on two fronts: to put films and also to remove them. Hundreds of crore gone in drain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourabhzen IMO, we have two options when when we can't stand these so called fools- fight them to beat them or leave. |
I don't know about you, but I'm incredibly annoyed with these hyper fools.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourabhzen It is really OT and shall not be mixed or compared with sun film ban.
P.S. You broke rule here of not using abussive language on this forum. I believe this was uncalled for. |
I know it was OT. I'm sorry for breaking the rule. However, it is WHAT IT IS on the ground. Please stand in line for 5 hours under intense Sun, with hardly any food or water. Their lives are so bad, sometimes I feel guilty for having so much with me...so I help them as much I can unlike many of these hyper fools.