Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO There's still a LOT of work left on this sheet and you guys are going to love what's coming your way. |
Thanks
GTO,
Technocrat & Zappo for the new format.
Just a thought-
If we have a comparison of the "
projected sales" of a car to compare with the actual sales, it should be of value.
Now, what do I mean by "projected sales". It could be based on the percentage increase/decrease on the year-on-year sales of the industry (or that segment of cars - say diesels in C segment). Or it could simply be based on the overall increase/decrease in sales in the industry as a whole. I expect other would be able to suggest better (simple) ways of working out projected sales.
This would give a good idea about if the car is doing better or worse. Pure number of sales doesn't tell us enough.
Gosh! We guys are demanding. Thanks for the effort you guys put in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by souravc On the overall numbers when i see the figures for ANHC and Optra , they tell a very contrasting story . ANHC is a quality product which is flying off the shelf when right priced, its non existent diesel option handicap notwithstanding. On the other hand even dirt cheap pricing for Optra coupled with a diesel mill isn't making the sales go anywhere ! Overall shows how we have matured as consumers - we hunt for bargains but are cautious about iffy products / brands. |
Would be interesting to understand what is seen as 'matured customers', mate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oxyzen The fact is Optra is dated. I have seen few people bragging to an unreasonable level about Optra, but the fact is if Optra wants to compete with the competition, it has to get a makeover. Other than space and power I dont see anything. The design is 2 generations old. And most people avoid cars that dont sell because of spares availability. (The biggest Marketing of a car is the number on roads.)
And then why buy a new magnum if the pre-worshipped ones are available at great value? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by prabhuferrari Dated, yes. But you cannot call it iffy. Even civic sells very low. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by souravc What more proof do you want when the sales trend stare at your face? Optra cannot even be termed as an also ran |
Optra Magnum Diesel
With all this talk about Otpra being brought to my notice, couldn't help commenting
@sauravc, @oxyzen -
Oh yes! I too have seen what can be termed as
unreasonable bragging about the Optra.
It has it's share of issues which don't make it sell - dated look, not seen as a successful car to be in, herd mentality (or better explained by oxyzen above), GM itself not really promoting it (am surprised how people, including me have forgotten at times that this car even did exist; many people still imagine it to be at around 12L, reports of TD cars not being easily available, TD cars being in bad shape, not putting a better HU, even though it needs little extra cost given the slot is a regular Double-DIN, etc). The above brings in enough doubt in a potential customer if this car is even going to be around after a while (as a potential buyer, I have had that too), if spares are going to be available. Most people won't go around doing research on the above and probably will take lesser informed decisions or calculated risks.
My guess is that GM isn't investing in this car for two reasons - that it has has to deal with the Beat D, Updated Aveo/Uva and Cruze to deal with first; and also that an improved Optra may hurt it's flagship (segment leader) Cruze in a significant way, as it is more practical than the Cruze.
But all that doesn't take away from it being a very well engineered car.
Having recently Test Driven most of the cars in the segment recently would like to add (and I am
specifically talking about the diesel Optra Magnum, have been told that the petrol/older model was no where close to this one)-
Besides the huge power (and torque, which really has to be 'felt' than put on paper)
and space, which oxyzen mentioned, the
it also has the following -
* An All Wheel Independent suspension (What other cars upto 15L have this?)
* A Hydraulic Steering (again how many?)
* All 4 disc brakes (IIRC, only the Linea T-jet and now the Fluidic have it in this price segment; the Fluidic was devoid of the bite and was nowhere as composed)
* By far the best ride in the segment.
* By far the best composure at high speeds across different road surfaces and situations.
* Despite the bodyroll, very good handling as well. More assured than most. (Isn't too agile, especially at lower/moderate speeds, though)
* A cabin which can seat 5 in reasonable comfort.
* Low and known cost of maintenance (max 32k for 45k - over that is paid by GM)
Optra Petrol in general, initial pricing, poor image of high maintenance (from the Opel Astra days), possibly being introduced at the wrong time, not enough change between the older Optra and the Optra Magnum would be other possible reasons for this not to do well.
There are many reasons for what numbers a car shows in it's sales figures. Ask Fiat (Linea), Mitsubishi(Cedia) (and depending how we see it, possibly even Rolls Royce!!
)
If sales were the way to judge a product, Maruti would have been the only manufacturer and Cedia would have probably been the worst C/C+ segment sedan.
PS: And might I add, IMO the interior quality (quality, not design) of the Optra is better than NFF, Vento, questionably about as good as Verna (I really liked the interiors quality on the Fluidic), SX4, Linea, Manza!! Team-Bhp Test Drives also rate the Optra's reliability as "Excellent".
Really do NOT see that as Iffy quality. Dated looks - yes. Iffy quality - no. Ask the owners of this car. I could go on, but realized that I already overdid it for this thread. More on the Spacious Diesel Sedans or Driven! thread, if you wish to discuss it further.
PPS: Yes, I like the Optra package, but am not blind to where it doesn't do too well. Just that the Optra (Magnum Diesel) is not tried out enough, before an opinion is formed about it.
Whew! What all I do for this car. Wonder if GM ever bothered enough about this. LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanduchitnis I own the ANHC just a year old, and they drop prices Rs 70 thousand. Feel cheated. But the hike in fuel prices @ 70/- per ltr killed the City and petrol cars including the Vento and buyers shifted to diesel cars. Todays papers point to a recession in the auto sector. Which is good news because we need fewer cars on our congested roads.
I work for ONGC and we drill for oil day and night and there is nothing down below.
Within the next 5 yrs automobiles must run on fuels other than fossil fuels. Today we pay Rs 70/- by next year we will pay Rs 100/- per ltr. For pensioners like me we will have ANHC's, all garaged and travel by Public transport.
We take fuel hikes for granted and adjust. No longer. Give and take 5 years fossil fuels will be unafordable.
Just my 2 cents. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jods No wonder you are not finding anything. You should be drilling in Middle East. Anyway the beauty of capitalism is that as the resources get diminished, their prices rise, innovation creeps in and alternate resources become economically viable. |
We need to spare a thought about people who are towards the end of their active earning years in life. Major inflation and diminished resources hurt them more, as inflation doesn't increase the inflow of funds - only the outflow increases.
Yes, other resources will become
relatively viable. May still remain
unviable for those who's inflow of funds hasn't increased.
Quote:
The new format is really good. Could we limit the months shown to the last three months along with last year's figures? Otherwise as the year passes by the number of columns would keep on increasing and we would need to scroll back and forth. Or else can the width of columns/font size be reduced?
|
+1 to that.
Last years figures for the same month would be very much welcome.
Adding the excel sheet as an attachment too, would be very much welcome.