Some times, when we leave our car for service, we get back our car in a dirty state. Reason for this is - May be the car was not washed properly after service
OR the car would have got dirty, because of service guys handling the car (glass parts, seats, dashboard .. etc) with their hands full of greece...Etc. We tend to feel that the bunch of guys who serviced our cars, are unprofessional, and so - either make an issue out of it
OR go back dissatisfied about service.
At times, when we leave our car for service, when the Job-Card is being written, we tend to analyse the service personnel's technical competency. If he sounds logical in his approach, we are happy. If not - cause of worry.
Everybody would like to have good quality services at affordable prices. Now a days, we as customers expect a lot from all quarters. So - When we buy a new car, we check out if the dealer has - a decent service facility, well organised service bay, good tools and equipments, area to accommodate large number of vehicles, service center in good location with good parking facility, professional attitude, knowledgeable qualified service team ... Etc.
When all these things fall in place, we come to the service cost. How much is the dealer charging for Labour? The lower - the better!!!!! . General mentality is (that includes me) - When
I am getting paid " It has to be the Maximum!" & When
I am paying " It has to be the Minimum!"
Now, coming to think about it seriously: A good dealer with all the facilities, will have good sales - and so good profits. He will have a reasonably good earning through spare parts (Major income?!!). And then finally - he has to price his services. In most cases, these prices will be fixed by the manufacturer.
We definitely can not get every thing for nothing. Can we?
Question is: For a good quality - professional service, how much
Labour charges are we willing to pay? When the above criterias are met, IMO the cost should not vary between companies, whether it is a
Maruthi or a
TATA or a
Fiat or a
Hyundai or a
GM or a
Ford or a
Honda or a
VW or even a
Skoda ...Etc. If these conditions are
not met, it can vary.
Now coming to the spare parts: Different companies have priced there spare parts differently. Quality also may vary. Let us ignore the below two things.
- Accidental damage - since it can not be a part of common service requirement.
- Quality issues which is car / manufacturer dependent - Since it cannot be a part of common service requirement.
Other than this, with the new generation cars, there is hardly any breakdown in between service intervals. Therefore - we are left with only
periodical services.
Let us look at the case of a
regular service:
- Oil price will depend on what oil (synthetic / organic) is used. This is common to all companies.
- Price of common parts like Oil filter, Fuel filter, Air filter ... Etc will vary from company to company. Quality also can vary.
- Now - Ideally - what should be the Labour charges?
Let us assume that our average monthly usage is 1500KPM. At this rate, per year we run about 18,000 Kms. Keeping this in consideration, for the
first 5 years, can we safely take - say
2% of the
Ex-showroom price of the car - as a reasonable cost for maintenance (Labour + Spare parts including brake pads, tyre replacement, battery replacement)
per year?
Can we have this as a thumb rule to measure ownership cost?
Expenses incurred due to accidents and quality issues are best left to the buyer / user. That will be in addition to this cost. This subject may have been covered in bits and pieces in various threads. I am trying to consolidate it.
Your participation in this discussion is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
