Team-BHP > Shifting gears > Gadgets, Computers & Software
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
10,507 views
Old 21st October 2009, 11:59   #1
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 647
Thanked: 144 Times
Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z

Hi,

I have the following configuration -

Processor Intel E8400 - 3.0 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB, 6 MB L2 Cache
Motherboard DG31PR - Intel G31 Chipset, 1333 MHz FSB
RAM - Kingston 2*1GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card - XFX 7900GS, 256 MB DDR3
HDD Seagate - 500GB, Sata2, 7200.12, 32 MB Buffer
Power Supply - Corasair 450W

I run Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7 on this desktop. Yesterday I ran CPU-Z out of the blue on this desktop and found this - (please refer to first image in attachments; I am not able to insert it here)

It is showing one core and that too is running on 2000 MHz. I suspected it to be some BIOS configuration and explored the BIOS settings. There is I found one setting - SW Single Processor Mode, which was enabled. I disabled it and restarted the desktop.

Both XP and 7, detected the new hardware and installed it's driver, but CPU-Z still showed one core, running at 2000 MHz.

Does this mean that my desktop is not running optimally? And if not, what must I do to make it do so?

Here are the other CPU-Z screens - (please see screen-shot below)


Please also tell me whether I have any issues in replacing the 7900GS card with a ATI 5770?

Cheers

Nitin
Attached Thumbnails
Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z-1.jpg  

Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z-2.jpg  

Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z-3.jpg  

Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z-4.jpg  

Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z-5.jpg  

ntomer is offline  
Old 21st October 2009, 14:46   #2
BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 63
Thanked: 30 Times

I think it is due to SpeedStep technology. The processor reduces the speed automatically when it is not doing much work. Start some program which uses the CPU heavily (e.g. audio/video encoding) and run this tool during that time. I am sure you will see a 3GHz rating.
Alternately, BIOS might have an option to disable speedstep. You can disable it and run the tool again. However, I recommend keeping this option enabled to keep the power consumption low.
gopalnayak is offline  
Old 21st October 2009, 14:49   #3
Senior - BHPian
 
ph03n!x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Coimbatore
Posts: 2,602
Thanked: 6,159 Times

Look at the value for multiplier - 6x is the least multiplier for the Speedstep. So the processor speed will be 6 multiplied by 333.3 (Bus speed). With this window open, try doing something processor intensive like encoding a WAV to MP3 or DVD to DivX- and the multiplier should change to 9, and processor speed will get to 9 x 333.3
ph03n!x is offline  
Old 21st October 2009, 15:44   #4
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 647
Thanked: 144 Times

Thanks guys. I understood that processor is running at the optimum speed, not the maximum one. I will run a heavy application tonight, and check the processor-rating again.

Now what should I do with that "SW Single Processor Mode"? It was enabled earlier, but I disabled it. What should be it's correct configuration - turned on or off?

Nitin
ntomer is offline  
Old 21st October 2009, 16:04   #5
Senior - BHPian
 
black12rr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ridin earth now
Posts: 1,280
Thanked: 349 Times

^^ then whats the use of getting core 2 ? , turn ON both and enable speed step .That should be fine .
black12rr is offline  
Old 23rd October 2009, 05:04   #6
BHPian
 
StreetAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Delhi
Posts: 202
Thanked: 49 Times

Both the CPU cores & SpeedStep are enabled by default when installed out of the box. One core should have not been disabled in BIOS in the first place unless your installer goofed up. Try downloading other utility software (Intel provides it's own utility program but I was unable to find that for DG31PR) & see if you get the same info from that as well

Last resort, try upgrading/flashing the BIOS. But Only do it if you know what you are doing.
StreetAddict is offline  
Old 23rd October 2009, 12:05   #7
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 647
Thanked: 144 Times

Thanks Guys,

Now please answer the other question regarding graphics card. I did a bit of googling and found that many people are recommending 4870 over 5770; both roughly cost the same.

Which of these two do you suggest? And will my PSU be able to support both?

Thanks

Nitin
ntomer is offline  
Old 24th October 2009, 06:31   #8
BHPian
 
StreetAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Delhi
Posts: 202
Thanked: 49 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntomer View Post
Thanks Guys,

Now please answer the other question regarding graphics card. I did a bit of googling and found that many people are recommending 4870 over 5770; both roughly cost the same.
5770 is only about 10% slower then 4870 but is more power-efficient, runs cooler, supports DX11 & has better features.

OT: I would have gone for an nVidia card due to the PhysX factor !
StreetAddict is offline  
Old 24th October 2009, 19:39   #9
BHPian
 
d3mon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 979
Thanked: 4,871 Times

As you already have a gfx card, you can wait for nvidia's answer in the form of Fermi(GT300) to be out in november. Will probably be out of your budget, but will send tremors in the entire industry, driving prices down
d3mon is online now  
Old 26th October 2009, 11:18   #10
BHPian
 
mathewpn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 43
Thanked: 4 Times

To my knowledge, you co annot disable the second core in a core 2 duo processor. In CPU-Z also it is showing 2 cores. you can see at the bottom. It is showing as 1 processor, 2 cores/processor, 2 threads per core. So it is definitely 1 Core 2 Duo processor. The clock speed , as it was already pointed out earlier, due the multiplier value. If you can disable speedstep in BIOS, you will get 3GHz throughout but at a cost of power utilization.
mathewpn is offline  
Old 26th October 2009, 18:24   #11
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 647
Thanked: 144 Times

Finally I have decided to go for Palit GTX 260 Sonic 216P. But this card requires 2 PCI-E 6-pins connector and my Corsair VX450W have only one. So I will have to use one Molex converter.

Will this be a problem?

Thanks

Nitin
ntomer is offline  
Old 26th October 2009, 18:43   #12
Senior - BHPian
 
aaggoswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vadodara
Posts: 4,997
Thanked: 3,000 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntomer View Post
Finally I have decided to go for Palit GTX 260 Sonic 216P. But this card requires 2 PCI-E 6-pins connector and my Corsair VX450W have only one. So I will have to use one Molex converter.

Will this be a problem?

Thanks

Nitin
Its matter of how much your PSU can give out. Fact is, if the PSU is strong enough then you need not worry.

Try this link and to be in the safe margin, the best shot is to have 80% of rated output of PSU as the real output. In your case, I think 360W is safe limit, but as your PSU is from realible brand, 410-420W max is what I think load can be given to PSU.
Antec Power Supply Calculator
aaggoswami is offline  
Old 11th September 2014, 16:11   #13
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 647
Thanked: 144 Times
Re: Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z

Hi,

Reviving a very old thread.

I have a 5770 graphics card running in my desktop. The motherboard (DG31PR ) specifications say:

1 PCI Express x16 graphics connector
1 PCI Express x1 connector
2 PCI connectors

I want to put an Asus Xonar Essence sound card in it. Should I go for PCI or PCIe version? And would it be wise to invest 11K on a 5 years old desktop? Though it still behaves impeccably and is more than sufficient for the kind of usage it undergoes.

Thanks

Nitin
ntomer is offline  
Old 11th September 2014, 16:42   #14
Senior - BHPian
 
reignofchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 2,558
Thanked: 2,527 Times
Re: Core 2 Duo - E8400 shows 2000 MHz in CPU-Z

Either should work. However the PCI-E version will be more future proof as most modern motherboards are ditching old school PCI.
reignofchaos is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks