Quote:
Originally Posted by navin Remember that making a F2.0 lens for a 1/1.8" sensor is not that diffcult. If you look at specs you will see many P&S cams have fast lenses because their sensor is so small.
There are many good cams out that that have NOT been reviewed by dpreview in fact of the lot that gendarmee listed only the LX3 has been fully reviewed. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai That is why I was only mentioning P&S reviewed by Dpreview. |
I've hyperlinked (review/preview pages)
DP-Review where Digital photography review had reviewed it &
D-Preview where they just previewed it and where neither, just hyper linked the dpreview news page. Also hyperlinked the other info links.
sigma DP1 and Panny lx3 have a full review at dpreview, Lumix G1 has a preview with quite a few sample pics, it's not up for sale yet though, hence no review from dpreview & dpreview seldom reviews Casio cams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai Often spec tigers turn out to be mice in performance. LX3 looks like a performance tiger too. The only glaring drawback is limited zoom, but the delicious wide angle more than compensates for it. Don't we have enough ultra-zooms with pathetic wide angle at 36mm or 38mm, most don't have issues with that. |
most wouldn't have a problem when there's little to choose from, nowadays superzooms like panny FZ28 help competition.
I was searching for a new P&S, with 28mm wide angle lense and infinity focus option and most importantly pocket able size. from quite a while, when I came across these. I'm not happy with the 35mm wide angle i have with the 6X zoom, i've even noticed that i don't always need the 6X zoom, and use upto 4x zoom in real world pics.
3 are P&S cams with features distant too an avg P&S, so thought I'd put all in one post and highlight the unique features.
DP1 is Sigma's P&S with a sensor as large as a dSLRs which also has completely different kind of sensor, its the best of both worlds but the trade off is a fixed prime lense.Casio EX-F1superzoom has a new cmos sensor by sony which can deliver 60 Fps, now made me think why sony didn't use it in its cams(i could add a review by another site/forum but dpreview has standardised reviews so stuck to only that) credit to casio for using it on its cam
Lumix L3 has 24mm and f 2, comparatively lesser pixel density.
May be easy for a P&S to have f 2, but hey how many P&S come with just one of that? Canon G5 used too have f 2 dont know about wide angle eg, and for the zoom range for a wide angle P&S, its darn good. image quality is better than most older venus3 engine pannys too. Also, many avg P&S come with 3x zoom so the 2.5x zoom isn't that much of a trade off, but the advantage of perspective of a 24mm over a 35 or a 28mm fantastic. It scores high on DP Review too.
I don't know much about slr lenses, but i haven't read about a 12-72 or 12-120 lense...12-24 is still 2X, point is, there's no P&S cam which has extremes of everything.
Panny G1 has attempted to change the basic design of an slr, used since 1950, making it smaller in size...found it to be interesting stuff so posted
