Quote:
Originally Posted by Raccoon Have never used a LCD yet, so couple of questions - LCD's come in 16:9 aspect ratios and CRTs in 3:4, right? Or do they make CRTs in 16:9 ratio too?
One of my gripes with CRTs is the 4:3 aspect ratio means that much of the content appears with large black area on top and bottom (so that the whole image can fit) which is a criminal waste of screen real estate.
I assume that does not happen with LCDs right?
Furthermore, I was shocked to hear from both the Onida technicians who visited our place that LCDs last only upto 2 or at the very max 3 years. This is like their rated life span and the period after which they may break down! CRTs inherently have much longer life spans. Further the PCB of CRTs an be repaired, whereas for LCDs they just have to replace them, which of course costs much more. Are these statements true? If yes, then I would definitely not be inclined to spend so much on a larger screen LCD tv that can only be expected to last 2 - 3 years. |
Never heard of CRT in 16:9 ratio.
It all depends on the source image. Normal TV is 4:3, while 70mm can be 2:1. So even wide screen LCD will not be filled top to bottom at times.
The life of the LCD is practically infinite. What deteriorates is the back light illumination. In normal LCD it is fluorescent source. In LED it is LED.
I have been using LCD monitors for the last six years. My 19" monitor is over five years old. Over time it has dimmed a little, but nothing to worry about. Maybe in TV they use less expensive back light which may dim faster, but it cannot just blow. Hence the life of an LCD TV cannot be specifically fixed to 2 or 3 years.
Regarding repairs. In a LCD the most expensive part is the panel, which today comes as one integrated package containing the LCD, the back light and row & column drivers, all sealed. Hence any repair requires extensive tooling and is done in the factory. As disassembling, repairing and reassembling such a complicated package is expensive the current trend is to throw away (at your expense) and replace. The exception is very large panels where the cost of the panel justifies repair costs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carboy Whose picture quality is better?
Are you comparing LCD with CRT or LCD with LED or LED with CRT?
Because I don't believe LCD is better than CRT. |
It is easier go get exact colour on a CRT compared to LCD. Further, most of the higher end CRT monitors have a greater brightness range compared to LCD. You hear a lot of "great blacks" in LCD, an issue which was not there in CRT, because there is always a spill over in back lighting which affects black (zero light!). The response time of the CRT monitor depends on its electronics, which can be practically instantaneous, while the response time in LCD would depend on the LCD technology and can vary from quite slow to moderately fast, but rarely in sub milliseconds as in CRT, hence you can get much faster refresh rates in a CRT compared to LCD, especially for very high resolution displays (> 2kx1.6k pixels)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guite Bringing up a slightly old topic. I have got this 4kva Bluebird voltage stabiliser, the type most commonly used with ACs. The front panel description is: "IC controlled electronic voltage corrector" and "specially designd for Air Conditioner only". Now, note the words "for AC only".
This is important because I want to put it ahead of my home inverter, so all electrical load on my inverter circuit will pass through this stabiliser. This will include lights, TV, PC, music system, etc. Can there be any harm in using this 'for AC only' stabiliser for normal home appliance loads?
I need to do this because in case of high voltage the home inverter (APC) cuts off mains supply and provide power from battery. In case it helps, the bluebird stabiliser specs are: input 170 to 280 volts, output 195 to 245 volts.
Any input will be appreciated. |
First of all as stated an AC stabiliser has a timer to prevent starting the AC instantaneously. This is to prevent damage to the compressor if the light went for a very short duration. Further as AC starting current is three to four times its running current, starting a lot of AC at a time; as in an office; would blow the main fuse due to starting surge.
A mechanical stabiliser is slow, hence it cannot prevent voltage surges. In my case I have seen equipment blow because the stabiliser could not keep up with the change in mains voltage, which at times can go from 190 to 240 in less than a second. The stabiliser though will help you stabilise constant low/high voltage to the UPS. What you need is a "high voltage cutoff" ahead of the UPS, to prevent the surges propagating through the system to your equipment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adityamunshi How come CVTs and Digital voltage regulators arent recommended ?
I thought servo stabilizers were old tech and had been replaced by CVTs. |
CVT is a saturated core device, meaning that after the threshold voltage is achieved no more voltage transformation will occur, that is there will be a constant voltage at the output. The only downside is waveform distortion and low efficiency, which results in over heating and humming.
Servo stabilisers are still used in industry to correct long term voltage variation. I have seen advertisements for selling 100KVA and larger servos. Their USP is high transfer efficiency (low loss), hence lower cost of operation. Other forms of stabilisers are either stepped transformer or electronic controlled AC-DC-AC devices which have lower power efficiency, but better control, hence used for low power applications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghpk This is getting common, When you have a sine wave inverter feeding the UPS, the power cut doesn't lets UPS detect restoration of current which is coming from your home ups/sine wave inverter.
Can some one shed some light on this please......
Is it that UPS in not able to digest a better energy graph |
Could not fathom the question. Is it that the UPS does not detect when mains is off/restored, or that UPS goes on battery when mains is off and inverter is on?
A sine wave inverter, if it delivers a true sine wave cannot be distinguished from the mains supply! Hence for all practical purpose the UPS will see the output from the inverter as normal supply.
It may be that in your case, the quality of waveform or the voltage output by the inverter is not considered by your UPS as "good quality" power, hence it is rejected. Note that an inverter is normally "line interactive" type device, that is when there is mains the input is routed directly to the output. It is only when the mains fails that the output is fed from the inverter.