Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO Guys,
As mentioned in this thread, my current 2.5 year old Dell Latitude 7490 has turned out to be an unreliable lemon |
Sorry to hear about your poor experience with Dell. I've actually had good experience with them (including the one time I needed their service). There's 4 of them belonging to different series. They have been reliable, and one of them is 6+ years old.
But I guess you don't want to live with Dell anymore. And that's totally understandable.
Note that I have very strong opinions about the OS. I use Linux for 95% of the time (and the other 5% I use Mac). I haven't used Windows in like a decade. It was horrible the last time I used it, and because I have gotten used to the well-thought-out underlying design of Linux and Mac (BSD) and the mental models around it, I don't ever want to go back to Windows again. I agree the UI might be nice, but it's horrible underneath the hood.
The reason I said that is because I only know about laptops that work well with Linux (and they work well with Windows also, so don't worry
).
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO Thanks a ton, guys! Guess its between Lenovo & Macbook going by the posts.
- Usage is basically business & Team-BHP content creation. Nothing too heavy like picture or video processing, but I have a lot of programs running simultaneously (right now, it's Chrome with 25 tabs + iTunes + Excel + Word + Firefox + GDrive + Dropbox + etc.). |
You need a laptop with lots of RAM (memory). I recommend at least 16 GB, which may sound like a lot right now, but it future-proofs your laptop for years to come. 8 GB can get the job done, but please get 16 GB. There's no replacement for displacement!
Memory is like a desk, and the SSD (or hard disk drive, henceforth HDD) is like a shelf. The operating system has to move things from the shelf to the desk to work with things. The bigger the desk, the more things that can be done simultaneously. Else it has to move things back and forth from the desk to the shelf and back frequently, and that slows things down.
SSD is highly recommended. It dramatically speeds up your boot times and the time it takes to open an application, save something to disk etc. The reason SSD is faster than a traditional HDD is that unlike HDD, SSD does not have moving parts. It's all electrical signals. You don't have to wait for stuff to physically move around to the correct location.
Don't bother too much with the processor. As long as it's at least an i5 you're good. AMD processors tend to have better performance, but your workload definitely does not require an extremely high processor performance, because that's not where the bottleneck is in your case. Also, hunting for AMD processors limits your options.
Quote:
No real budget as this is going to be a work tool. Quality, reliability & uptime are top priorities.
|
My first recommendation to you is the Thinkpad. These are robust, abuse-friendly, high-quality, durable workhorses that can take a beating. Think Toyota Land Cruiser. It's also one of the few laptops out these that has useful ports on it. As an additional plus point, Thinkpad keyboards are the best among laptops.
Quote:
- Lenovo - Which model? If X1 Carbon, which generation? Am seeing 6, 7 & 8 on their website. If ThinkPad, which model or series in particular?
|
Go for Thinkpad T, X, X1, or P series (only). Other Thinkpad series may not have as much quality and durability.
Spec it up high, and it should be good for years.
Of the letter-series I mentioned above, I think (not 100% sure) it's only the T that has additional RAM slots (in addition to the soldered RAM). That means 5 years down the line you have the possibility of expanding the RAM to 24 or 32 GB and keep things fresh. Some of the other series do not have an additional RAM slot, and therefore you cannot expand memory later.
My second recommendation would have been the Dell XPS, but I suppose you don't want to try Dell again.
My third recommendation is the Macbook.
Quote:
- Macbook - Okay to run Windows?
|
It's technically possible, but I wouldn't recommend it. And besides, why would you want to run windows on a Mac anyway?
Quote:
- Macbook - 13" or 16"? Is 13 too small & 16 too big?
|
13" felt too tiny to me. Go for it only if you have a nice external monitor that you're going to plug into. Also keep in mind that once you get used to that nice retina display, looking at the same UI from a standard HD 1080p monitor would look horrible; you need a 5k or 6k resolution monitor to keep things looking beautiful.
Long story short: just get the 16". No it's not too big.
Keep in mind that Macbooks only have USB-C ports.
As an aside, I don't know about the reliability of the newer Macbooks. They're probably reliable, but it's something I personally don't know about.