[ani_meher]

One query: I have one 35mm 1.8g lens bought at 7700. I was planning to return it (yet unopened), but seeing the current prices of the lens - mostly at 8.5k everywhere), I am in two minds whether to send it back and get money refunded, or to keep it. I don't need it right now, but can surely see its use in future, so I may have to buy it then.

What would you do in such case? Keep the lens gotten at a good price, or buy it later parhaps costlier when you may need it most?

[rameshnanda]

^^ I guess you are referring to the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 g DX lens. This is worth for every rupee you have spent for this lens. This is awesome in many way that it can even blow out lenses which cost more than 50k. My suggestion would be to retain this.

[M35]

Just received Sigma 150-500mm. It came with a carrying case, lens hood, front & rear caps and a couple of straps [one for the case and the other to be used with the Tripod. It is very heavy and huge. The lens itself is close to 2 kg.

Some pictures, clicked using my iPhone 4S. Using the iPhone camera for the first time, after having purchased it a couple of years ago.

[raghu.t.k]

Originally Posted by M35

Just received Sigma 150-500mm. It came with a carrying case, lens hood, front & rear caps and a couple of straps [one for the case and the other to be used with the Tripod. It is very heavy and huge. The lens itself is close to 2 kg.

.....

Congrats. I sure it would terrify anyone, who is not into photography .

[Sawyer]

Originally Posted by rameshnanda

^^ I guess you are referring to the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 g DX lens. This is worth for every rupee you have spent for this lens. This is awesome in many way that it can even blow out lenses which cost more than 50k. My suggestion would be to retain this.

I agree, a great little lens to learn on a DX format, and to grow up with. It can even be used as a quality 35mm lens on FX bodies for indoor work where the little vignetting is not noticeable.

[rameshnanda]

Originally Posted by Aroy

I have a D70, which I want to sell as I have D300 and now D3300. Please PM me if interested.

The D70 is much better than D40 as it has a motor in the body, which allows you to use relatively less expensive; but equally good; D lenses.

Sorry for delayed reply. Somehow missed your post. My friend is keen on D40 because of its light weight. The search is still on and surprisingly we couldn't find one yet.

[satan's_valet]

Guys, need your help. I am a complete novice when it comes to camera, though I would like to change that one step a time. First step being, buying a DSLR camera around 30k (25k-35k actually).

Need your valuable suggestions on which camera I should go for.

[NetfreakBombay]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

First step being, buying a DSLR camera around 30k (25k-35k actually).

Canon 1200D (29k)
or
Nikon D3300 (34k)

Both are pretty good cameras. I would go with D3300 since 1200D does not have sport metering. Or you can buy 1200D and spend rest of the money on a better lens.

Can't go wrong with either for entry level DSLR.

[ampere]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

Need your valuable suggestions on which camera I should go for.

Do you plan to seriously get into photogrpahy? Because if yes, its possible that you might outgrow the entry level DSLRs very soon. I would say check out D5200. Its about 37K with the kit lens.It will hold its own for some time.

You can then take your time to learn with kit lens and then slowly decide and plan for what other lens you want to buy.

[ani_meher]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

Guys, need your help. I am a complete novice when it comes to camera, though I would like to change that one step a time. First step being, buying a DSLR camera around 30k (25k-35k actually).

Need your valuable suggestions on which camera I should go for.

I too support above post, buy a Nikon D5200. I did not try the D3xxx series, but the canon 1xxx series felt definitely lower than D5200. Luck and patience would get you a price within 35k for kit lens + body + 4/8 gb card + bag.

What camera are you currently using? Do you know about PSAM modes? If not, start reading, otherwise it will be overwhelming to even hold the camera in hand. Though the D5200 clicks wonderful shots in Auto as well, the modes give you superb control over the picture.

[girimajiananth]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

Guys, need your help. I am a complete novice when it comes to camera, though I would like to change that one step a time. First step being, buying a DSLR camera around 30k (25k-35k actually).

Need your valuable suggestions on which camera I should go for.

IF you are not very serious about photography and if your usage is very occasional , you can rent cameras and lenses depending on the availability. It is a never ending expense, but fortunately all the equipment can be rented. Buy a good body with kit lens instead of a very entry level camera. You can always rent lenses when you need them. I would say D5200 is a good choice to begin with.

[satan's_valet]

Originally Posted by NetfreakBombay

Canon 1200D (29k)
or
Nikon D3300 (34k)

Both are pretty good cameras. I would go with D3300 since 1200D does not have sport metering. Or you can buy 1200D and spend rest of the money on a better lens.

Can't go wrong with either for entry level DSLR.

Thanks Netfreak. I will look into these cameras. If possible, could you please detail on sport metering. I am hearing this term for the first time.

Originally Posted by ampere

Do you plan to seriously get into photogrpahy? Because if yes, its possible that you might outgrow the entry level DSLRs very soon. I would say check out D5200. Its about 37K with the kit lens.It will hold its own for some time.

You can then take your time to learn with kit lens and then slowly decide and plan for what other lens you want to buy.

Yes ampere. Not in the full fledged manner though, at least for the moment. Operating a DSLR camera with its various modes is a little more complex than what I had anticipated. The D5200 comes to 37.5k with 18-55 lens in Flipkart. I should probably read up a little more on DSLR before picking up a camera.

Originally Posted by ani_meher

I too support above post, buy a Nikon D5200. I did not try the D3xxx series, but the canon 1xxx series felt definitely lower than D5200. Luck and patience would get you a price within 35k for kit lens + body + 4/8 gb card + bag.

What camera are you currently using? Do you know about PSAM modes? If not, start reading, otherwise it will be overwhelming to even hold the camera in hand. Though the D5200 clicks wonderful shots in Auto as well, the modes give you superb control over the picture.

Thanks ani_meher. I currently use a sony coolpix but have been wanting to get my hands on a DSLR for sometime now especially for its modes.

What is the difference between D5100 and D5200? There is a price difference of about 8-9k between the two.

Originally Posted by girimajiananth

IF you are not very serious about photography and if your usage is very occasional , you can rent cameras and lenses depending on the availability. It is a never ending expense, but fortunately all the equipment can be rented. Buy a good body with kit lens instead of a very entry level camera. You can always rent lenses when you need them. I would say D5200 is a good choice to begin with.

I probably wont end up doing professional photography, but I want to see how far I will go with this. I understand its not the camera but the person behind it that makes good photographs, but having a better camera has its own advantages, right? I will check out 5200 and as you mentioned, I can always rent lenses if required. Thanks for your inputs.

[ampere]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

I understand its not the camera but the person behind it that makes good photographs, but having a better camera has its own advantages, right? I will check out 5200 and as you mentioned, I can always rent lenses if required. Thanks for your inputs.

Agreed. But you should also not endup outgrowing your need very soon. Body will last for a long time; at least 5-6 years for a minimum. Hence the need to invest wisely. And since its not that huge a difference, I thought of mentioning.

[satan's_valet]

Originally Posted by ampere

Agreed. But you should also not endup outgrowing your need very soon. Body will last for a long time; at least 5-6 years for a minimum. Hence the need to invest wisely. And since its not that huge a difference, I thought of mentioning.

Yes. Totally agreed. No point buying a camera for 37k and check the market in a couple of years for a new one. I also agree that technology is a fast changing and evolving and what I buy now should be compatible with the new changes for a few years to come. Thanks for your suggestions ampere.

[NetfreakBombay]

Originally Posted by satan's_valet

Thanks Netfreak. I will look into these cameras. If possible, could you please detail on sport metering. I am hearing this term for the first time.

These provide a good background on metering:

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/20...spot-metering/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metering_mode

Regarding D5200, it is a good option if you can stretch the budget a bit. Keep in mind that 3 - 4k would be required for accessories as well. I.e.:

1. Camera bag
2. Filter
3. Memory cards
4. Tripod