Quote:
Originally Posted by Small Bot That's off-topic, though a disturbing and dystopian line of thought, so I'll not go down that route.
I'm more interested in how long this wave of EVs can last in China, and i have quite a few questions for which I'll wait for answers.
The subsidies for EVs are not going to last forever, what happens to manufacturers and buyers when they stop? Would that create a tilt back to fossil fuels or would consumers be trapped with EVs?
|
Those subsidies have already stopped. As of Jan 1st, 2023 many national level subsidies ended and EV sales has remained strong. Their subsidies started long back, in 2010 and has tapered since.
A lot of commentary surrounding China and their progress is accompanied by plenty of "Why can't we do that?". We can't do that because if we did it would go against the ethos and the ethics of this country's governing structures.
In China it is not merely a question of distributing subsidies but it is accompanied by ruthless targets and decentralization of planning. There are not only country-level incentives, but state-level and city-level ones. And each of these bodies all work like corporate management teams with an eye on return-on investment and achievements. The line between public and private companies are a blur in China, the centre of gravity for each them floats somewhere outside these companies. This is not so in India where private companies do everything in their grasp to keep their decision making out of government's reach, basically our entire thesis of progress is based on how governance can be "minimum".
The Chinese government literally picks companies, hands them land and money and looks for results. There is no L1, competitive bidding stuff.
For example in China, the city of Shenzhen is
invested in the progress of its economy. As a result it nurtures its own companies. They have the freedom to set their own visions.
Lets say BMC (Bombay) wakes up one day and says we want to leaders in Li-Ion batteries. In China, a body like BMC can invest in startups, create a company called BMC Batteries Limited, acquire land for that company and hand it over for free. Then they can sanction say $1 billion as subsidies, have the authorities to tweak tax laws, import laws and basically say, lets get going. It can overnight create their own PLI policy or designate areas to be Free-trade-zone etc. They can tweak their labour-laws etc, open up banks to provide cheap-capital and so on. This freedom in rule-making extends to states too, and the central government can come up with their own overaching policies.
This BMC Batteries will not function like an India PSU, they function like a very efficient private company. This fictious city can also proclaim that all EV buses acquired by their public transport company needs to have BMC Batteries. No questions asked. This is how China builds scale and in speed.
Shenzhen independently can also raised money for its investments. Also as an example look at the names of many CHinese companies, it has the city name in it. Shanghai Auto, Beijing, Changan etc.
It is not that corruption does not happen in China. The central government has their own "Big Fund", which is like a Chinese government version of Softbank's Vision Fund, for example. They disburse vast sums of money to companies to fund research and development. And like Softbank, they have been under increasing scrutiny due to some dubious investments that they have made, but a lot of it has also helped. They are known as Government Guidance Funds and there are seperate funds investing in semiconductors, batteries, quantum computers etc.
State-owned auto companies like BAIC, SAIC, Changan and the lithe-ness in which they have created EV-brandnames is amazing. Some of them move as fast as startups. They have the freedom to get into partnerships, invest abroad, sell stake etc with minimum turnaround times in decision making. As an example look at Hongqi. They took something akin to the "Ambassador" brand in India and turned into premium EV brand that is making inroads in Europe.
What also helps is that the cities, provinces and the centre are not pulling in different directions. There is a pyramid structure in what they want to achieve. If the Chinese government's mandate is to say they want to reach 100% self-suffiency in xyz technology, the rest of the country (public & private) aim to work under those targets.
To me how they function is fascinating to study but more at an arms-length distance. None of this stuff will work in India, and not that China is perfect. But a lot of what they do is so weird and interesting, it is a great read.