Most people covered the major flaws like potential magnetic risks, heating and inefficiency but I’d like to mention two more :
1. Materials and durability :
Metals don’t mix well with magnetic field. Google tells me, that asphalt isn’t just an insulator of heat but also interferes with magnetics. The coils in the car cannot be placed inside the battery since the enclosure of pack is metallic. Most cars also have a metallic undercarriage (EV or not)
The reason why phones with wireless charging have plastic/glass back nowadays is the aluminium/steel structure of phones interfering with magnetic flux which is responsible for energy transfer between coil in phone and coil in charger pad. Premium phones use glass. Cheap ones use plastic. Glass is a no-no on the undercarriage.
One cannot just put the coils on outside of the undercarriage and without covering it aptly — I’m pretty sure an exposed coil will refuse to work after crossing the first water puddle in mumbai rains or have the copper coil turned into a copper plate after scraping the underside on the gazillion speedbreakers (see : suspension breakers) which we have here.
You’d need to use polycarbonates/plastics to allow flux through without interference. How durable is a plastic cover over an exposed copper coil? I’m not sure, but doesn’t sound a lot to me.
2. The sheer precision to line up coils perfectly:
It’s not the most convenient of things, considering most modern phones will still refuse to charge if you miss the intended position even by 1mm.
Quite frustrating to realise you haven’t been charging despite going over road with wireless charging, just cause you were driving with a little deviation from middle of the lane and the coils didn’t line up perfectly.
These charging disasters are very common — putting the phone to charge on the pad and coming back, only to realise it wasn’t lined correctly and didn’t charge at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedTerrano All this is definitely exciting. Especially the possibility where one could theoretically charge their car on the go. However, it did raise some concerns in my mind.
If this tech catches on, in a few decades we can see it adapted on a massive scale. Numerous countries, including ours, have banned manufacturing of petrol/diesel fuelled vehicles from a specified future date. So the number of EVs is guaranteed to spike.
This would obviously lead to more and more demand for wireless charging. The question to ponder upon : Will it affect earths magnetic field? From aeroplanes to birds to grounded humans to migratory animals. All of us depend on this field being right.
For those who might find this silly, paranoid or even stupid, let me quote from this Stanford research paper on tidal wave power generation. (emphasis mine)
Who is John Galt. Apparently, it's us. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/zjl/pdf/tide0.pdf |
Right, the magnetic field needs to be much more stronger than that in our phone chargers — the charging stops as soon as one lifts the phone even 1mm above charger. The flux is too weak.
To transfer power between charger pad buried under asphalt, and a car itself with at least 150mm clearance will need far stronger magnetic fields.
You not only need stronger field for clearing that gap, but also because of you want more power to be delivered, you’ll automatically need to increase the turns in coils which also increases field as a consequence of delivering more power. It would no doubt be a magnetic mess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosjam I have a different take on the wireless charging scenario.
I had read a report about mobile phone wireless charging in which they had mentioned that as much as 30% of the energy consumed is wasted as heat and induction losses, and this is when the phone is placed right on top of the charging pad.
Imagine the losses when there is an air gap involved (ground clearance of the vehicle) and the fact that there have to be thicker insulation materials coming between the inductive coils of the vehicle.
While more tedious, the charging cable (for both the mobile phone as well as the EV) would be the most efficient way to transfer energy.
The whole wastefulness of 30% loss of energy on a global scale sounds scary. |
That’s absolutely correct.
Apple recommended using their 20W adaptor with 15W MagSafe chargers for this very reason. (I was confused at time of purchase because MagSafe doesn’t come with adaptor in box

due to which I did further research into this — the adaptor connected to charging pad must be 20W — despite the phone actually getting only 15W from the pad)
To charge an EV like model 3 at 100kW, you’d actually be drawing much more from supply — close to 140kW. The whole point why EVs are cleaner despite the source of electricity, is their high efficiency. However if you waste so much energy in heat, it practically becomes less efficient and more polluting since you need to produce more electricity to charge same vehicle.
In fact, I reckon the losses to be even higher for EV charging. It won’t be just 30% for an EV charger since heating increases with square of current. A 3kW Nexon EV charger uses 15A. A 100kW DC FC at 400V uses close to 250A.
Tesla already uses liquid cooled charging cables to allow for that juicy 250kW charging. It’s also needed for future use with Tesla Semi which will need much more than 250kW charging.
There’s no way these coils can be buried in ground (insulating nature) without proper cooling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentinel17 Kudos to them for finding out a brilliant method to charge EV’s.This is that stuff you see in movies and cartoons depicting the future.But again will this be beneficial here in India,considering that pavements are occupied by pedestrians and shops majority of the time.And there are also not a lot of pavements here.Welp![Also what would happen if someone peed on it,considering that we have a lot of stray animals and sometimes disgusting humans who practice it as a ritual] |
It’s cool tech, but the sheer infra development needed to support this wireless charging gizmo will die a death from dearth of funding, I get this feeling.
1. Dig roads existing roads up
2. Lay expensive copper wiring coils (hundreds of metres of copper wiring in a single coil and idk how many thousands of coils to cover a whole highway)
3. Manage for cooling of the coils.
4. Supply it with electricity all the time.
5. Inefficient, so you get only 70% of the electricity that reaches the coils (30% wasted as heat in coils) thus, charging cost increases.
Wireless charging is that same “flying car” tech which never really caught up that well, even in phones. People thought wireless charging to be like Wifi — have a device in your room “emitting energy” and your phone, laptop and other appliances grabbing energy and charging without connecting the wire.
It turned out to be BSNL broadband. Needs a wire anyway, slow as snail, and can’t do anything on phone while it’s charging or I’ll disturb the perfect position and it will stop charging.
The tech is too inefficient, too expensive, too finicky. All necessary ingredients for glorious recipe of bad user experiences.