|
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Search this Thread | ![]() 252,435 views |
![]() | #46 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Chennai
Posts: 33
Thanked: 31 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Faboulous read, excellent narration. Thank a lot for this..!! I've seen a few movies (Down Periscope, U571, Crimson Tide, Hunt for the Red October) that are submarine based and has always wondered what life would be abroad one. Some of your articles on sound refraction is really good. Knowing that a navy officer would need knowledge on geography, physics, ocean currents and what-not to be a good submariner is absolutely amazing. Thanks once again for this excellent write up! |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() | #47 |
BHPian ![]() | Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy
Here is what I have prepared myself with, though I have read multiple newspapers and articles on the same. I would request you to add a few things to help us understand a bit better on the submarine tech. 1. Could you tell us what exactly happened with INS Sindhurakshak. Isnt a ship berth - probably the safest place for a submarine to be. 2. Added to the above, could you tell me the usual pain and maintenance routines that are executed on the submarines. I am sure this would land upon the captain though. (to avoid disaster and calamities, I have heard the defence minister requesting the officers to be a bit careful in handling such assets, are our officers careless ? ) 3. I have learned that Sindhurakshak was rescued with the help of an American Submarine rescue organization. Doesn't Indian Navy have any tech here. Why is the process so expensive. On top of all, why do we salvage such a ship ? Can we refurbish and use them, or is it going to be scrapped. (* Thanks for your hint sir, owe those questions to you). I know I am free to be stupid here, but let me ask this question too. 4. If we abandon a ship, it will float on the water and might bank on some shores; or may eventually sink. What if we abandon a submarine in the middle of the ocean ? Sinking is natural to it. Will it stay afloat? Or what if the crew abandon it underwater while it is on the free flow ? Thanks in advance sir. Please drop in an inbox message if my questions are not worth for a discussion amidst this forum ! |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #48 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,093
Thanked: 65,016 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
Peterjim, thank you for your questions. I will try and answer them as best as I can as an amateur enthusiast. All questions are always welcome; no question is ever stupid. It keeps me occupied! (1) On the basis of reports on the investigation that have been made public in the press the eventual cause of the explosion was one or more of the torpedoes exploding due to a fire. What the pieces made public do not cover is the cause of the fire. ![]() (2) Submarines require periodic maintenance like ships. Key difference is that once in 5 to 6 years or thereabouts the pressure hull is checked by x-rays for microscopic cracks which could later rupture under intense water pressure. (3) To salvage a sunken vessel is a very specialized and skilled task. There are a few companies across the world that do this and it is usual to bring one of them in to do the job. Even the Russians had to invite a consortium of Dutch and American companies to raise the Kursk. The raising of a sunken vessel, in this case ~2500 to 3000 tonnes, is done with giant floating cranes and pontoons attached to the sunken sub and then filled with air giving the whole piece buoyancy. The primary reason to salvage is to examine what happened and learn what we can of how to avoid future mishaps. The sub is too far gone to be re-used. It will probably be laid on the sea bed to use for diver training or become a target for torpedo practise. (4) If we abandon a sub in the middle of the ocean on the surface with all hatches sealed it will float for a long time like a ship. It we abandon it underwater (assuming this can be done while keeping the interiors dry - suggest you don't try it!) with neutral buoyancy it will stay hanging underwater till it reaches a patch of water with lower density (due to variation in salinity or temperature) and will then start to gradually sink. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | Chethan B G, peterjim13 |
![]() | #49 | ||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Calcutta
Posts: 4,668
Thanked: 6,227 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
Quote:
Regards Sutripta | ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks Sutripta for this useful post: | peterjim13 |
![]() | #50 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks Jeroen for this useful post: | V.Narayan |
![]() | #51 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Kolkata/Blore
Posts: 105
Thanked: 188 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
Also, on what parameters/factors does a sub's maximum safe diving depth depend on? | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #52 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,093
Thanked: 65,016 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
(2) Maximum safe depth is largely a function of the composition and thickness of the steel alloy from which the pressure hull is built, the quality and accuracy of the welding and its ' perfect roundness'. It is not as if you can just make the steel thicker - the thickness and pressure bearing quality of the alloy need to go hand in hand. However once you get below 600 metres in depth the water pressure is so great that a lot of the equipment that otherwise functions in the open water (sonars, compressed air bottles, anchor equipment, waste discharge systems etc) start facing difficulties in functioning. At 600 metres down the pressure is 600 tonnes per square metre. The Russians built a few semi-experimental hulls out of titanium which is immensely difficult to weld. One of them named 'Mike' class by NATO was said to have a normal operational depth of 1000 metres and a design depth of 1250 metres. World Submarine Fleets For interest of all readers this is a compilation of today's major submarine fleets by quality and size. I have ignored North Korea due to the bulk of their fleet being of 1950s vintage design albeit of recent construction. USA 14 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines 4 SSGN guided missile submarines 57 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered China - People's Liberation Army, Navy 5 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines 5 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered 40 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) 17 SS diesel electric powered patrol submarines ie without submarine to submarine attack capability In size China is now rapidly getting to be the equal of Russia. I have placed them above Russia as it is difficult to judge the maintenance and availability of the fleet in Russia now Russia 13 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines 7 SSGN guided missile submarines 18 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered 21 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) UK 4 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines 7 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered France 4 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines 6 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered UK and France maintain small fleets of very modern nuclear powered boats only including 4 ballistic missile armed ones. This helps them stay in the league tables and count in the UN Security Council Japan 17 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) Japan's fleet of diesel electric hunter killers are the best of their kind in the world as would be expected from such a technologically advanced nation India 1 SSBN ballistic missile nuclear powered submarines under trials 1 SSN attack submarines, nuclear powered 13 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) If our myopic thinking had not stopped the Type 1500 programme in the mid-1990s we would have been far better placed today. INS Kalvari, built to the French Scorpene design, is expected to join the fleet later in 2016. Photo below shows the boat being moved out for trials. South Korea 13 or 14 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) Turkey 13 SSK diesel electric powered attack submarines (also referred to as hunter killers) Turkey and South Korea entered the club of submarine builders at the same time as us ie in the 1980s and with the same designer-manufacturer combination ie IKL-HDW of Germany. But they stayed the path with long term strategic thinking and have in these 30 years built 13 subs each with gradual improvements. It is a reflection of what could have been with us. We are effectively re-starting all over again with the Scorpene project now underway. Last edited by V.Narayan : 10th April 2016 at 19:19. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | peterjim13, Sandman689 |
![]() | #53 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,093
Thanked: 65,016 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy India successfully tested a submerged launch of K-4 missile from INS Arihant on 30th March 2016 according to press reports. INS Arihant which is under trials is India's first ballistic missile armed, nuclear powered submarine. It has been designed and built in India. The K-4 missile is a part of the 'K' series being developed. The K standing for Kalam as a mark of respect to the late President APJ Kalam. Arihant is said to be capable of carrying 4 of the 3500 kms range K-4 or 12 of the smaller shorter range K-5 (range 700 kms). These tests bring India one more step closer to commissioning her own nuclear triad. To be successful INS Arihant needs to marry three areas of technology - the submarine hull with the nuclear propulsion and both together with the missile that needs to be launched from underwater. Of course the missile has to then find its way to the target. There will be a fourth leg and that will be command and communication by the political and military leadership of when to use and how to give a clear and concise instruction. All in all the successful firing of a ballistic missile from a submerged submarine is a proud moment for India's scientists and Navy. http://www.firstpost.com/india/nucle...AT_LATEST_NEWS http://www.ibtimes.co.in/drdos-nucle...-report-673978 Photo shows the K-4 being launched from a submerged pontoon. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 3 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | Foxbat, peterjim13, R2D2 |
![]() | #54 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 584
Thanked: 1,416 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Narayan Sir, I cannot thank you enough for the depth of information that you have painstakingly compiled. I have a few questions, it might sound silly but with a non technical background, I am just curious to know more. 1. You mentioned that the the Diesel-Electric subs will be more quite than the Nuclear powered ones. So in a nuclear powered sub, it is the steam power that turns the prop, and this mechanism is more noisy compared to the pure electric motors that turn the prop in a DE sub, is my understanding correct? 2. Not related to subs, but the Brahmos has a range of 290 Kms, isn't this range to small? In this case we would have to keep these missiles ready to launch very close to our borders with our neighbors, right? 3. The submarines have a mother ship, are these mother ships specially modified to be able to work in syn with the Subs? Like a special hull design to let the sub stay very close to the ship? Or any warship can be used as a Submarines mother ship? 4. Does it ever happen that a submarine turns sides way when submerged? Like in the movie K-19 they show a scene where the Submarine is doing a rapid ascend and she starts to roll. Does it ever happen in real? 5. Not sure if you have answered this or written about this, but just curious, why is the a Submarine referred to as "She", "her" ? Just curious here. Well, these are the questions as of now :-) The very first Submarine movie i saw was K-19 and it is still my favorite Submarine movie. What a story it is, the way it is filmed is just amazing and gives us a glimpse of how difficult those days of Cold War were for those young men and women. It is my dream to see a submarine in water, i was once on a ferry boat in Mumbai and at a very far distant i saw a submarine, but it was too far, nevertheless i was thrilled. I'll go crazy if i ever see one very close. Are civilians ever given an opportunity to see a submarine? If yes, what is the process? From this article, it was interesting to know about Germany who helped us so much, the help from Russia is in general known but Germany was a new information to me. Also, the double standards by the Yanks is yet again eminent. When you wrote about the PNS Ghazi, that had to be one of the most interesting reads of my life and our armed forces are filled with so many unsung heroes. i feel that yes, giving your life for your country is the greatest sacrifice of all and it should be honored at the highest level, but at the same time, equal recognition should be given to people who took brave smart decisions and helped us retain a stronghold in those conditions. Thank you once again Sir for all this information, it is indeed a proud feeling to go through our history and achievements. Jai Hind |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #55 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,093
Thanked: 65,016 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
(1) Your understanding of nuclear subs' propulsion is right. The nuclear plant creates the heat that generates the steam that drives the turbines which in turn rotate the propeller through a multi-stage transmission unit. All these pieces require a lot of pumps, motors and ancillary equipment to run them which creates a lot of noise and the transmission unit putting through say 15,000 to 30,000 kilowatts is also noisy as hell. In contrast when running on its motor the diesel electric boat has just that one motor humming quietly. Further in patrol mode the diesel-electric would be loitering at say 4 knots (~7.5 kmph) consuming power measured in mere tens of kilowatts only. Further even if a nuke sub is cruising along at 4 knots the entire paraphernalia of a 30MW plant is running. Diesel Electric boats carry a small creep motor of less than ~ 100 kw in output which they use when patrolling slowly - in this case the main motor of say 300 kw is shut down. A small 10kw motor is easier to insulate than a 30MW nuclear-steam power plant. The nature of a smaller slow turning electric motor versus a nuclear plant, whose pumps have to keep running even if the sub is stationery, leads to a very significant difference in noise levels. (2) Brahmos is an Indo-Russian project. The missile technology control treaty does not permit a country (Russia here) to sell missiles to another or develop missiles for another country (in this case India) that does not have that specific technology if the missile has a range in excess of 300 kms. Hence Brahmos has a design range of 290 kms. ![]() (3) Mother ships are used to enable subs to operate far from their usual bases. A mother ship provides support at a distant anchorage. Normally speaking subs can operate quite well without a mother ship. It is a 'good to have' and not a 'need to have'. Submarine mother ships (less usual today than 50 years ago) are tailored made for the task. (4) Less likely in real life. But yes a submarine like a ship can roll quite a bit - say 35 degrees very comfortably either way. A sub I guess would be hard pressed to capsize underwater unless she damages her ballast tanks. Modern tear drop shaped subs can be flown underwater like an aircraft. So when they turn sharply at speed the hull will roll like an aircraft does when banking. A sub would roll like K-19 if it is not being able to control its balance through its trim tanks. (PS I haven't seen the movie) (5) Ships in the English language carry the feminine gender and in the Russian language the masculine gender. The English reference of a ship (or a submarine) as a she has its origins in the Latin language. For sailors at sea for long periods the ship is the mother. all aircraft carrier pilots refer to their ships as 'mother'….protector, nourisher, safety et al. Think of Motherland. If you want some saucy answers read the first two reasons on the link here http://www.glossophilia.org/?p=1411 Best wishes, Narayan Last edited by V.Narayan : 7th May 2016 at 17:23. Reason: additions | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks V.Narayan for this useful post: | Dieselritzer |
![]() | #56 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
I'm not sure that is correct. To my understanding when a nuclear sub runs silent, ie slow speeds, the steam system works largely on natural convection principles. The only pump running is the cooling pump. The main noise are coming from the steam running through the pipes, expanding in the turbine etc. Also, I don't think the steam produced by nuclear reactor drives the turbine directly. That means you would have highly radioactive steam going through the turbine, pumps and condensor. The steam heated by the reactor is fed through a steam generator. That is often called the secondary circuit and that is the steam that drives the steam turbine. Here is a good explanation with some easy to understand diagrams http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/eng/reactor.html As fas I know American and Russian nuclear subs have steam turbine driving the propellor. French nuclear subs have the steam turbine drive a generator that ultimately drives an electric motor. Jeroen Last edited by Jeroen : 7th May 2016 at 19:05. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() | #57 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,093
Thanked: 65,016 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
| |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #58 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
Its still incorrect I believe. The noise is mostly from the steam as there is very little mechanical noise, contrary what you wrote. I have never sailed on nuclear powered vessels. But I am a certified Dutch Marine Chief Engineer with an unlimited ticket. Under Dutch maritime law there is no distinction between diesel, steam, electric or even nuclear propulsion. Remarkably enough. So during my naval college days we had to learn a lot about nuclear systems. Never had the pleasure of putting it into practice though. I have had the pleasure to be on an exchange program with the US Navy in the early eighties and I spend a couple of days on the Nuclear carrier Enterprise. We were authorized to visit the nuclear part of the engine room as well. (After signing waivers and NDA) Would love to spend some time on a (nuclear) sub! Bit difficult these days. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #59 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 44
Thanked: 67 Times
| I think the noise component of nuc boats, alongwith the expansion & passage of steam, is also of the pumps which are used to circulate the coolant in the reactor unit. Had read somewhere that to minimise this noise & harmonic during close quarter manuvers, newer design reactors use a coolant system when during low power setting, the coolant circulates naturally ( forgot the actual tech name for this phenomenon ). Also if I am not wrong, these pumps etc need to be mounted on mounts / isolators / dampers to prevent the transmission of the same to the hull. Even if the sub is purely drifting, the reactor coolant pumps will be running & this will always make a minimum noise whereas for a Diesel-Electric sub, once the motor is stopped, there will be no mechanical hamonics / vibrations etc. Would recommend if possible & if you enjoy the topic of subs, to read a superb novel titled THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER by Tom Clancy. It has superb detailing as for the equipment, tactic etc used by & againt subs. Yes the technology & tactics have since evolved, but a gripping tale till the end. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #60 | |
Senior - BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chennai
Posts: 4,561
Thanked: 5,646 Times
| Re: Submarines of the Indian Navy Quote:
I think the same holds good for IAF Pilots as well. The brother of a colleague of mine was in the Airforce (not a pilot though) when the Lt.Nachiketa incident took place during the kargil war, and I remember him saying they have to contribute quite a significant part of their pay towards premium. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() |