|
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Search this Thread | ![]() 477,635 views |
![]() | #406 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: KL 7
Posts: 2,598
Thanked: 7,345 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers It's not just chinese aircrafts, but their ships are proving problematic as well for Pakistan. Theres a reason when it comes to hi tech defense exports, chinese are laggards. Quote:
| |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks shortbread for this useful post: | V.Narayan |
|
![]() | #407 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,039
Thanked: 2,492 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
It's hard to tell how much might just be biased messaging but broadly speaking it does seem that Chinese defence exports don't have a sterling reputation. I vaguely remember the Emiratis not being best pleased with Chinese drones in their service. On another note I just came across a Reddit comment that explained something I hadn't considered. Looking at the newly launched Fujian, you can see the on deck sheds to cover the tracks for the catapults - obviously I thought it's to hide them from prying eyes overhead. What I hadn't considered is that they're air conditioned too given how hot it gets in Shanghai and also weather protection from inclement weather. Feel a bit silly now for not having considered that. Thinking back to when the Vikrant was launched, similar sheds in places on its deck now make much more sense. I wonder how much pomp and circumstance awaits the Vikrant commissioning now. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks ads11 for this useful post: | V.Narayan |
![]() | #408 | ||
BANNED Join Date: Jan 2021 Location: New Delhi
Posts: 285
Thanked: 1,999 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
The important thing for us to note is that they have such a massive engineering/production capacity in the first place. This gives them a massive advantage over us in terms of filling up gaps caused by attrition during a serious war (whereas we have to depend on unreliable and costly imports for the same). This capability will, almost certainly, be used by the Chinese in support of our other enemy (Pakistan) as well. The way I see it, if we don't get an efficient domestic MIC up and running within the next 5-10 years, we are in for a world of hurt. Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by sierrabravo98 : 18th June 2022 at 11:15. | ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks sierrabravo98 for this useful post: | Red_Phantom |
![]() | #409 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,140
Thanked: 66,432 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
Last edited by V.Narayan : 3rd July 2022 at 08:57. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 3 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | ads11, badboyscad, dragracer567 |
![]() | #410 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: BAH / MCT
Posts: 986
Thanked: 5,358 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
I'm stating this to tear down two misconceptions: 1) As the Chinese, German and Soviet examples show, you don't have to be a historic maritime power to build a formidable Navy. 2) Even if we were to entertain that excuse, India has always dominated the Indian Ocean, just that this domination wasn't achieved by empires based in Delhi. Navy aside, even civilian infrastructure is lacking with the busiest Indian port - the JNPT, ranking only 35th globally with most of the transshipment into India handled by Dubai or Colombo. Even Vietnam has two ports that are busier than India's busiest. Our esteemed Ministers and Babus seem to forget that India has 7516 kms of coastline (longest in the Indian ocean I believe) while sitting more than 2000 kms away in landlocked Delhi. Apologies for the digression and rant! | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 3 BHPians Thank dragracer567 for this useful post: | DhinaStark94, DicKy, V.Narayan |
![]() | #411 | ||||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,039
Thanked: 2,492 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
I've come across plenty who seem to think that the architecture of the Type 003 carrier is based off of an erstwhile Soviet super carrier design that never made it to fruition (probably something like the Shtorm or Ulyanovsk classes) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
While a country needn't have a historic naval tradition to become a naval power (look at the USN - it was only the Great White Fleet onwards and the eroding of the RN's power after WW1 and then the hammer blow of WW2 that they truly achieved Teddy Roosevelt's second-to-none mantra), I guess institutional knowhow is still a powerful factor. It's esoteric and not really quantifiable but I guess there's the powerful esprit the corps that comes from an illustrious tradition. The PLAN lacks that, and let's hope for everyone's sake they never have reason to change that lack of wartime record. | ||||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank ads11 for this useful post: | dragracer567, V.Narayan |
![]() | #412 | |||
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: BAH / MCT
Posts: 986
Thanked: 5,358 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
Quote:
About the RAN, their build-up is significant in their own right relative to their population size, Australia is a country of a little more than 25 million, even ROK has double their population. Their nine Hunter class frigates will be a gamechanger with the Aussie version expected to nudge 10,000 tons - much bigger than our own upcoming Nilgiri class frigates of which we are acquiring only 7 and even our destroyers. So, the RAN is acquiring more vessels than India which are at the same time larger than their equivalent Indian vessels (though to be fair, we are building our frigates much faster than the Aussies are building theirs and would probably have launched our own next-gen frigates by the time the Aussie get all their Hunter class frigates.). Coming to my favorite naval aircraft - the P8, they've inducted these very quickly and will soon field more aircraft than India making them the second-largest operator - a huge deal when you consider that the other operators are established powers like the RAF and IN. Quote:
| |||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank dragracer567 for this useful post: | ads11, V.Narayan |
![]() | #413 | ||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,039
Thanked: 2,492 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
Speaking of the island - potentially silly question incoming but why the bigger exhaust towers for gas turbines compared to steam turbines V.Narayan? Quote:
| ||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 2 BHPians Thank ads11 for this useful post: | dragracer567, V.Narayan |
![]() | #414 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,140
Thanked: 66,432 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers ^^^^^^ Won't go into the size of various carriers discussion as ads11 and dragracer567 have already covered that. As this forum is full of engineers I hope you will excuse this non-engineer as I grope around trying to answer this question on Steam Turbines & Marine Gas Turbines. If I err please remember to forgive is divine. Ads11 here goes -- A steam turbine as we know by design burns fuel to heat/super heat steam which then runs the turbine till the super heated steam condenses to saturated vapour and then pure water and gets recycled back to the boiler. The volume of air gulped in burnt and spewed out is just what is needed for that heating of the boiler water and combustion is as complete (in modern steam turbines) as possible. Combustion is slow relative to a gas turbine or even an internal combustion piston engine. The air and fuel mixture is allowed time to combust almost fully. What comes out is as close to a mix of water vapour and CO2 as practical. The fuel air mixture heats cooler and cooler stages of water/steam as it works its way through the process transferring its energy along the way and then to the exhaust funnel. The exhaust at the funnel is I believe around 60 to 90 degrees centigrade. If it gets to 100 to 120 degrees water jets to cool it down get triggered. A gas turbine on the other hand sucks in a prodigious volume of air only a part of which is combusted in the explosive combustion chamber* and what reaches the power extraction gas turbine is a mix of very hot uncombusted air + combusted air moving a great velocity which then exits at several hundred degrees centigrade after only a part of its energy is extracted. And because of the heat this gas exhausts at expanding volumes. Exhaust temperatures are in the 500 to 650 degrees centigrade. The energy is not just in the combustion as in steam turbines but the velocity of the exhaust gas that drives the power turbine. Hence the exhaust funnel of a marine gas turbine and the air intakes are several times bigger than the gas turbine proper. So large infact that removal of a GT for maintenance is done by pulling it out of the exhaust funnel. Steam Turbines can be made very big in terms of power. Think thermal power stations. Even in WW2 carriers like the Essex class had around 150,000 shp of ST power installed. The the giant intakes (downtakes) and uptakes (exhausts) of a gas turbines pose structural design challenges for ship designers of carriers. From a war perspective the acceleration, instant start and reliability of a GT (due to its simplicity) makes it worth it. Not quite a complete answer but it gives you the direction. * so for a given quantum of thermal energy the air intake of a GT is several times that of a ST. Last edited by V.Narayan : 4th July 2022 at 23:10. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 4 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | ads11, badboyscad, dragracer567, skanchan95 |
![]() | #415 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,039
Thanked: 2,492 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Thanks as ever for the detailed explanation V.Narayan! That clears up a fair bit. I guess the whole energy transition mindset has me wincing a bit at the thermal losses via the gas turbine approach - I wonder if that hot exhaust can be harnessed in any way? Surely if it's ejected at those temperatures, it would light up on infrared - that can't be good? Now you mention it I have seen an image of a marine turbine being lowered down one of those intake-uptake shafts - iirc it was on the BBC docuseries covering the construction of the QE class. I wonder what sort of power output the Fujian steam turbine must be outputting then to not only push it along but keep the lights on. I know the USN closely guards the dash ability of their supercarriers - regardless it's a pretty open secret that those big ships can move at quite a rapid clip thanks to their nuclear power. I wonder just how limiting the purported steam turbine on the Fujian will be in that regard, especially given it's a much bigger ship than its predecessors. Coincidentally, on the topic of the Imperial German naval build up, Netflix just threw up a recommendation for me the other day: a French docuseries (has an English dub) called Naval Power. Only seen episode 1 but it covers that pre-WW1 naval build up, including the submarine innovations of the French (I didn't know it was a French naval engineer who pioneered a lot of common features of the WW1 and WW2 era boats). |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | #416 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: BAH / MCT
Posts: 986
Thanked: 5,358 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
Also, another puzzle in my head is the fact that western navies also operated many steam turbine carriers for most of their history including the Kitty-Hawk class of the US Navy, many of which boast a distinguished war record and controlled the Pacific and the Atlantic back in the day. So, why are the current crop of Russia/Soviet designed/design-based steam-turbine carriers having so many serviceability and maintenance issues especially with regards to the boilers? Is there something wrong with the fundamental design of Russian/Soviet steam turbines used in aircraft carriers? Or is it steam turbines in general? As usual, apologies if I sound ignorant! It's would be a bit of an irony if the INS Vikrant with its reliable GE gas turbines has longer legs than the Fujian which is about twice as big! | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks dragracer567 for this useful post: | V.Narayan |
|
![]() | #417 |
Senior - BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chennai
Posts: 4,563
Thanked: 5,660 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers ^^ Even all nuclear powered aircraftcarriers and submarines are steam powered. The nuclear reactor just heats up water to produce steam. Thereafter it is steam power. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks Gansan for this useful post: | dragracer567 |
![]() | #418 | ||||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,039
Thanked: 2,492 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following BHPian Thanks ads11 for this useful post: | dragracer567 |
![]() | #419 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,140
Thanked: 66,432 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers Quote:
In the late 1950s when the Soviets experimented with the first gas turbines they developed two routes to maximize power:weight ratio and acceleration - gas turbines and super high pressure rapid acceleration steam turbines. Both routes were pursued as it was then not known what shortfalls a GT will demonstrate in the long run. At that time today's high power output, super reliable, medium speed marine diesels of were not on the scene yet. The only way to have a lot of power at sea was ST or GT. So they developed what they called (IIRC) the TV-12 series of super high pressure rapid acceleration STs with a maximum output of 50,000 shp per shaft - popularly called turbo specialized. How exactly that worked I do not know. These were installed 2 each in the Kresta class cruisers, Moskava class helicopter carriers, Soveremenny class destroyers and 4 each in the Kiev class aircraft carriers (the last of which is the Vikramaditya). Simultaneously they developed the M8E gas turbines (the world's first successful GT to be deployed on an operational warship) for the Kashin destroyers that develop 96,000 shp at 15 degrees centigrade and 72,000 at 34 degrees. That is one issue with GTs - the output drops by 25% in warm ambient temperatures. The GT route proved to be the better of the two eventually. The high pressure ST's while good for power:weight ratios and acceleration compared to traditional STs proved to be a little more temperamental and that is the root cause to the background noise on Vikramaditya's powerplant. Hope this helps. | |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 5 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | ads11, dragracer567, Gansan, sridhar-v, TSIboy |
![]() | #420 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Delhi-NCR
Posts: 4,140
Thanked: 66,432 Times
| Re: Indian Naval Aviation - Air Arm & its Carriers INS Vikrant continues its sea trials. Preparing for commissioning in August 2022. In 1948 the first white paper on long term plans for the nascent Indian Navy were drawn up. Interestingly they were prepared by one Commodore Knott. It included right then that the IN should have 3 light fleet aircraft carriers. Quite visionary as then the IN was a motley force of a few small ships of pre-WW2 vintage. The Royal Navy would have nothing of it and one senior Royal Navy officer went on record that the 'bloody Indians should learn to walk before they can run'. Photos below of INS Vikrant, reborn, on sea trials prior to commissioning. A national achievement even though the eternal nay sayers might say it took too long. 5 to 7 years up or down isn't too long in the life of nation building so long as you get there. The IN today has a periodic competition on young officers writing a dissertation on the strategy. The best dissertation wins the Commodore Knott trophy. |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
The following 5 BHPians Thank V.Narayan for this useful post: | ads11, dragracer567, Red_Phantom, sagarpadaki, TSIboy |
![]() |