Originally Posted by rippergeo
(Post 908028)
@zenx- asr245 is right. on an incline, the geared bike will be easier and faster to propel than an ungeared one.it will not help much even if you slow down(unless its a very slight incline) In both cases, the total energy spent on climbing the same incline will be the same. Lets say- 200kcal/ or joules or whatever. but you can spread out that energy demand over more pedal strokes in a geared bike. so instead of expending 200/20 kcal per pedal stroke i.e-10kcal, you can spend 200/40 or 200/100 and so forth per pedal stroke in a geared bike(depending on the gears available) what that translates into, for your muscles is that you can use your aerobic system to provide the energy in a geared bike up a slope. that system lasts longer, is more efficient and will cause less toxic by-products that cause fatigue. in an ungeared bike, you are forced to come up with all that energy in a very short time, which will push your muscles into anaerobic metabolism. simple rules for gear usage 1. if you legs are hurting, downshift 2. if you're panting- upshift. 3. if both your lungs and legs are on fire- slow down.:D EDIT- I agree zenx- bangy inclines are not worth using lower gears on. |
Originally Posted by opendro
(Post 908120)
On the energy spending part, I have a little different opinion. The amount of energy required to run a kilometer is not same as amount of energy to walk a kilometer. The way how a gear vehicle helps is like this: assuming I spend 2 KCal to pedal a cycle for 10 kilometers in half an hour, it does not mean that I can spend 2 KCal in one minute to run the same 10 kilometers. The point is that there is a range of force we can exert from our weight through our legs. A rolling wheel needs a certain amount of torque to roll for a given mass of the vehicle/rider at a given surface. At lower gear, you exert more torque (free-wheel radius is larger) for the same force and thus make you feel at ease to move. But it will not move that fast as in higher gear. It is as simple as comparing between opening a heavy door by pushing near the hinge or near lock/handle. If you try pushing near hinge, the door may not even open if it is a little tight fit or heavy. |
Originally Posted by rippergeo
(Post 908140)
I agree with that. did not want to complicate things, thats all. in theory, the energy used should be the same for displacing the same amount of mass. adding variables like higher wind resistance at higher speeds, less friction for rolling vs walking,the extra effort required to just stay upright while walking, the extra effort for moving more parts of the body while running etc, the list of variables is endless. I just wanted to illustrate the fact that geared vehicles are easier to use on inclines. The example I used was crude, but I hoped it would get my point across. |
Originally Posted by opendro
(Post 908236)
Coming back to the same again :Frustrati |
Originally Posted by sammyboy
(Post 908314)
Hey wanderlust we are eagerly waiting for the pics of the roadpro :) and a review too would be great |
Originally Posted by V-16
(Post 910551)
Anybody heard of FireFox cycles. They look cool but i dont know how good they are. Will someone recommend a good bike for me to use. I intend to take up cycling as a hobby and to keep fit. This bug has caught me from the time I took up spinning as an exercise (and my school days when i used to have a bike). I want a sleek looking, comfortable bike which i can carry on my outings. Also can someone please explain the Funda of gears in a bike. stupid: I dont understand how they work all i know is they do not operate like in a car. |
Originally Posted by nemo
(Post 904201)
@zenx, thanks for the link and the piece of advice that i have now decided to purchase a bike. I would want to start small, I've budgeted about 5-7k and if i really see myself cycling more I'll upgrade after a year or so and buy one of the fancy bikes - Trek seems to be a popular choice but for now it appears Hero Thuder MTB is the bike i should go far. Does anyone a have a comment or feedback on my choice of bike? Also please let me know the shops that you can recommend based on your experience. I've few names from the bikezone forum but i wanted to check here aswell. |
Originally Posted by V-16
(Post 910551)
Anybody heard of FireFox cycles. They look cool but i dont know how good they are. Will someone recommend a good bike for me to use. I intend to take up cycling as a hobby and to keep fit. This bug has caught me from the time I took up spinning as an exercise (and my school days when i used to have a bike). I want a sleek looking, comfortable bike which i can carry on my outings. Also can someone please explain the Funda of gears in a bike. stupid: I dont understand how they work all i know is they do not operate like in a car. |
Originally Posted by asr245
(Post 915492)
My brother recently bought a firefox bike (ATB) from there store in Gurgaon for 12.5K inclusive of helment, stand & mud guards. Got 21 gears (Shimano) front & rear shockers among other things. As for comfort, the seats in these bikes are small & hard (?). So if the butt hurts for the 1st few days it is normal. |
Originally Posted by wanderlustindia
(Post 915568)
It is advisable to use cycling shorts (padded-ones). Very helpful in the long run. |
Originally Posted by asr245
(Post 918423)
Hmm. Never considered those. How do they help? |
Originally Posted by wanderlustindia
(Post 918465)
Most racer/ATB/MTB cycles have seats which have very less butt support (small and narrow seats). The crotch area is subject to a lot of friction due to the constant butt movement on a cycle. Paddings in cycling shorts can protect your crotch in such cases. Ofcourse if you are running only a few kms on a daily basis, you may think this is not necessary, but for long distance commutes they help a lot. Couple this with a gel seat cover (I got one along with my RoadPro). |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:51. |