![]() |
Originally Posted by Samurai
(Post 3048196)
When I was considering Thar DI last year, a Mahindra SA whom I know well told me not to consider it because of NGT520. Apparently, it has issues with synchronizer rings, they are getting too many complaints. |
Originally Posted by SPIKE ARRESTOR
(Post 3048238)
A bit surprising, may be with a particular batch of NGT520s. Yes, there were problems with synchronizers which were corrected with new rings and hubs. This was somewhere around 2006-2007 though. The SA may have told this to you, possible, as I do not know what is going on there since last year.:) These are currently the most used transmissions with M&M vehicles (although that does not necessarily imply they must be trouble free). EDIT- Is that also the reason why you insisted on having the KMT in your new Jeep? Spike |
Originally Posted by Samurai
(Post 3048196)
When I was considering Thar DI last year, a Mahindra SA whom I know well told me not to consider it because of NGT520. Apparently, it has issues with synchronizer rings, they are getting too many complaints. |
Originally Posted by Geje
(Post 3047803)
Thank you Commander. Can you please share the total cost of conversion to OKBJ. Now your Jeep has the latest upgrades, Next TURBO IC ? :D Jess |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 3047927)
Barani, this is a very popular get home-tip. I hope the owner has sorted out the issue and not relying on haldi for ever. :) Hi Gege, If you are not planning to increase the track width, then, your stock axles will do the job. It is a cheaper alternative. You will have to source the discs and the entire set up though, will cost you ~14k. |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 3048160)
Sorry for not being clear. One of my main concerns in OTR's is the underbody taking a hit. However, hard we try, sometime or the other, we end up on the cross member like a sea-saw. Specially when we venture out on unknown territories. IMO, the KMT 90 can handle that kind of abuse much better than the NGT5xx. There is also one more reason, of which, I'm not so clear, that most of the commercially used 4x4 vehicles in Ooty are swapping their hardly used NGT520 for a KMT90. |
Originally Posted by Geje
(Post 3047803)
@Jerrycan. Prabhu Sir, Can you help me source a front and rear axle set up and an NGT 520 geat box with Transfer Case. Thanks In advance Jess |
Originally Posted by SPIKE ARRESTOR
(Post 3048238)
A bit surprising, may be with a particular batch of NGT520s. Yes, there were problems with synchronizers which were corrected with new rings and hubs. This was somewhere around 2006-2007 though. The SA may have told this to you, possible, as I do not know what is going on there since last year.:) |
Originally Posted by DeClutch 4X4
(Post 3048335)
On reading your quote 'Apparently, it has issues with synchronizer rings, they are getting too many complaints.' I am forced to seriously give it a thought, if Mahindra ever recall for replacement of faulty parts or something in the past unlike other players in the market? If at all they ought to or will , i wonder how it will be like for Mahindra's?:Shockked: |
Originally Posted by SPIKE ARRESTOR
(Post 3048238)
EDIT- Is that also the reason why you insisted on having the KMT in your new Jeep? |
Originally Posted by Samurai
(Post 3048196)
When I was considering Thar DI last year, a Mahindra SA whom I know well told me not to consider it because of NGT520. Apparently, it has issues with synchronizer rings, they are getting too many complaints. |
Originally Posted by dhanushs
(Post 3047927)
Hi Gege, If you are not planning to increase the track width, then, your stock axles will do the job. It is a cheaper alternative. You will have to source the discs and the entire set up though, will cost you ~14k. I know a person who has the front an rear axles in stock. I will let you know. btw, why do you need an NGT520 GB?. The shifts will be much smoother, with no Jeep music, but, IMO, nothing can beat the good 'ol KMT 90 off-road. The reliability is unmatched. Please do re-think your decision. |
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 3048503)
Hi Geje, will let you know the details in person. A bit heavy on the wallet thou. I'm really happy with the 2003 Di and KMT gearbox but is nowhere near the word refined. Think this is one of the noisiest engine/gearbox combos that we have among our team :D But love the instant torque and does manage to cruise around 80-90. So cant complain much but accept the fact that you cant have the best of both ends. Geje think you should hold your existing axles if your not planning a wider track. You should have changed the Leaf sets also. They seem flimsy on the Axle housing. Looks like it will not hold on and might Buckle. |
Originally Posted by Geje
(Post 3054497)
Its going to be the KMT 90 with a T 18 Transfer Case My Configuration 53" Front Open Knuckle Axle Housing from a MAJOR; Cost 11000.00 Fully Floating Rear axle of an NGCS Army 550 with 19 spline axles, without LSD; Cost 18000.00 Both the above will have 160 PCD hubs to accommodate 16 inch rims. The t 18 Transfer Case is going to be T 18 Single liver u type shifting: Cost 8000 Cost of Conversion 20000.00 ( Includes Over hauling of all the parts being changed) Friends, your inputs and views are valuable, please advice. Regards Geje |
Originally Posted by sreejeshmp
(Post 3054565)
is there any 53" OKBJ available ? Major OKBJ is 51" Why you need a 53" FFRA ? then your front is 51"& rear is 53" ? what is the extra load / tough job you are doing with the rear FFRA? Same time you can get a 51" army rear axle with LSD and bigger/stronger axle, I don't think it break in your 50% or 80% Offroad :D . Major PCD is 139.7 not 160. |
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 3048503)
Hi Geje, will let you know the details in person. A bit heavy on the wallet thou. I'm really happy with the 2003 Di and KMT gearbox but is nowhere near the word refined. Think this is one of the noisiest engine/gearbox combos that we have among our team :D But love the instant torque and does manage to cruise around 80-90. So cant complain much but accept the fact that you cant have the best of both ends. |
Originally Posted by Geje
(Post 3056793)
Sir, You are right, It is 51' OKBJ on the front and SFRA from a 550 and the pitch is 139.7. It is not about the off road, I'am worried about. During week days I plant to use this Vehicle as a load carrier for a foundry. It'll carry loads up to 1 Ton. But that will surely not break the axles, I am sure. So SFRA it is. Geje |
Originally Posted by Jerrycan
(Post 3048533)
Why do you need an OKBJ ? I would suggest, you go ahead and buy Barani's front and rear axles. |
Originally Posted by Geje
(Post 3057865)
Do the Non NGCS 550 and 540 share the same steering box assy. Please shatre the details. Thanks Geje |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:17. |